Re: CPU stress tests for LilyPond

Note too that there's a list of the results for the Gzip test: https://openbenchmarking.org/test/pts/compress-gzip >From this list it appears to me that Intel Core i5-11600k could be the "gold" PC for LilyPond... On Thu, Dec 2, 2021 at 2:41 AM Paolo Prete wrote: > Hello Hans, > > I don't

Re: CPU stress tests for LilyPond

Hello Hans, I don't think this test can give reliable results for what we need to compare. With my processor (Intel Celeron N3350) it took 96 seconds to compile MSDN.ly But my CPU is listed with score 287: https://browser.geekbench.com/processors/intel-celeron-n3350 ---> (1712 / 287) >From what

Re[2]: justify

The score is in 4/4 throughout. Perhave I have made a mistake somewhere that I now can't trace. vriendelijke groet, Erik Appeldoorn -- Origineel bericht -- Van: "Lukas-Fabian Moser" Aan: "E Appeldoorn" ; "lilypond-user@gnu.org" Verzonden: 1-12-2021 21:00:05 Onderwerp: Re: justify

Re: justify

Meanwhile… check out this awesome bug!! =) \version "2.22.1" MyUpper = \relative c'' { \override Score.SpacingSpanner.strict-grace-spacing = ##t %% comment/uncomment this line and the contexts switch!! c4 b a g8[ \appoggiatura { f32[ e]} d8] } MyLower = \relative c' { f4 g a b16 c

Re: justify

Hi all, > \layout { > \override Score.SpacingSpanner.strict-note-spacing = ##t > } That works [for this MWE], as does \layout { \context { \Score \override SpacingSpanner.strict-note-spacing = ##t } } Meanwhile… check out this awesome bug!! =) \version "2.22.1" MyUpper =

Re: justify

Am 01.12.21 um 20:58 schrieb E Appeldoorn: It looks like that throughout the score. Measures that have \appoggiatura seems to cause a disbalance in measures above or below. If the measures above/below have more notes the problem becomes more pronounced. To be more clear: looks to me as if

Re[2]: justify

It looks like that throughout the score. Measures that have \appoggiatura seems to cause a disbalance in measures above or below. If the measures above/below have more notes the problem becomes more pronounced. vriendelijke groet, Erik Appeldoorn -- Origineel bericht -- Van:

Re: justify

Hi Erik, please keep replies on-list so anybody can chime in and/or participate. Am 01.12.21 um 20:47 schrieb E Appeldoorn: Thanks Lukas-Fabian. It makes matters worse. It squashes the \appogiaturas in one place and stretches notes across the barlines in other places. I have attached a

Re: justify

Hi Erik, Am 01.12.21 um 20:31 schrieb E Appeldoorn: I have a score with multiple instruments where some instruments have the \appoggiatura, but the voices above (and/or) below are simple straight voices. When compiling the score the voice without the \appoggiatura looks uneven. There is extra

Re: opposite of shortest-duration-space

I think bendAfter has a lot of issues with spacing and collisions. You can easily customise a glissando though to take advantage of its more robust functionality. Here's a basic attempt. Currently it has a fixed path shape but someone better in Scheme can help to make this more flexible.

Re: justify

From: lilypond-user on behalf of E Appeldoorn Reply-To: E Appeldoorn Date: Wednesday, December 1, 2021 at 12:37 PM To: "lilypond-user@gnu.org" Subject: justify I have a score with multiple instruments where some instruments have the \appoggiatura, but the voices above (and/or) below are

justify

I have a score with multiple instruments where some instruments have the \appoggiatura, but the voices above (and/or) below are simple straight voices. When compiling the score the voice without the \appoggiatura looks uneven. There is extra space between the notes where in the other voice is

Re: Syntax error encountered while engraving a successfully updated Mutopia ly file

Aaron Hill writes: > convert-ly knows how to fix this: > > > \override Thing #'property #'sub-property = #'value > % ...to... > \override Thing.property.sub-property = #'value > > > It does not however seem to correct: > > > variable #'key = #'value > % ...to... >

Re: opposite of shortest-duration-space

Oops: 2.23.5 On 12/1/21 11:07 AM, Paul Scott wrote: In Notation 1.3.2 Falls and Doits there is: \override Score.SpacingSpanner.shortest-duration-space = #4.0 Is there a way to make the width of \bendAfter less? TIA, Paul

opposite of shortest-duration-space

In Notation 1.3.2 Falls and Doits there is: \override Score.SpacingSpanner.shortest-duration-space = #4.0 Is there a way to make the width of \bendAfter less? TIA, Paul

Re: LilyPond 2.23.5 released

Some of the new abilities are really great. I love \after # command for shifting hairpin durations. String-lines seems very useful. Also lots of nifty new parentheses possibilities. Those were things that really stand out in the change list. I am sure other people might jump in excitement for many

[Navigator] Bundesfachagentur Educa: Aufnahme LilyPond in den Navigator

Hi! Anyone interested in taking care of this? Greetings, Jannke --- Begin Message --- Sehr geehrte Herren Nienhuys und Nieuwenhuizen Um den verantwortlichen Personen in den Schweizer Schulen und Schulverwaltungen bei der Suche und Auswahl von digitalen Werkzeugen eine Orientierungshilfe zu

Re: LilyPond 2.23.5 released

Thanks for the comment - I remain with 2.22.1 so far. *Леонід - Leonid* Virus-free. www.avast.com

Re: How to change the alignment of the dashed line in \cresc

Hi Valentin, Thanks again and you are right. In the following example the 'cresc.' gets too close to the staff, with the stem of the 'b' in the first bar entering in the space of the dynamic. Adding Y values of 0.75 seems to work well. { \override DynamicTextSpanner.bound-details.left.Y = -0.75

Re: Labelled slurs

Hi all, On Nov 30, 2021, at 2:54 PM, David Kastrup wrote: > there may be the desire to eventually match labelled > slurs at more than Voice-level while retaining Voice-level slurs > locally. However, I have no idea what kind of form this sort of feature > could take exactly. Could be an

LilyPond 2.23.5 released

We are happy to announce the release of LilyPond 2.23.5. This is termed a development release, but these are usually reliable. If you want to use the current stable version of LilyPond, we recommend using the 2.22.1 version.