Hi David,
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 4:10 AM, David Sumbler wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-01-18 at 15:07 -0600, David Nalesnik wrote:
>> arpeggioArrowUp will apply to a bottom context. Rewriting its
>> definition (in ly/property-init.ly) will work here:
>>
>> arpeggioArrowUp = {
>>
On Wed, 2017-01-18 at 15:07 -0600, David Nalesnik wrote:
> arpeggioArrowUp will apply to a bottom context. Rewriting its
> definition (in ly/property-init.ly) will work here:
>
> arpeggioArrowUp = {
> \revert PianoStaff.Arpeggio.stencil
> \revert PianoStaff.Arpeggio.X-extent
> \override
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 2:40 PM, Caio Giovaneti de Barros
wrote:
>
>> The above doesn't work: it produces an arpeggiando sign across the two
>> staves as required, but without the requested arrow head.
>>
> Man, you read my mind. I was trying to solve the exact same problem
The above doesn't work: it produces an arpeggiando sign across the two
staves as required, but without the requested arrow head.
Man, you read my mind. I was trying to solve the exact same problem just
now.
Caio
___
lilypond-user mailing list
%
\version "2.19.48"
\new PianoStaff <<
\set PianoStaff.connectArpeggios = ##t
\new Staff {
\arpeggioArrowUp
1\arpeggio
}
\new Staff {
\arpeggioArrowUp
\clef "bass" 1\arpeggio
}
>>
%
The above doesn't work: it produces an arpeggiando sign across the two