Re: Arrow on cross-staves arpeggio

2017-01-19 Thread David Nalesnik
Hi David, On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 4:10 AM, David Sumbler wrote: > On Wed, 2017-01-18 at 15:07 -0600, David Nalesnik wrote: >> arpeggioArrowUp will apply to a bottom context. Rewriting its >> definition (in ly/property-init.ly) will work here: >> >> arpeggioArrowUp = { >>

Re: Arrow on cross-staves arpeggio

2017-01-19 Thread David Sumbler
On Wed, 2017-01-18 at 15:07 -0600, David Nalesnik wrote: > arpeggioArrowUp will apply to a bottom context.  Rewriting its > definition (in ly/property-init.ly) will work here: > > arpeggioArrowUp = { >   \revert PianoStaff.Arpeggio.stencil >   \revert PianoStaff.Arpeggio.X-extent >   \override

Re: Arrow on cross-staves arpeggio

2017-01-18 Thread David Nalesnik
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 2:40 PM, Caio Giovaneti de Barros wrote: > >> The above doesn't work: it produces an arpeggiando sign across the two >> staves as required, but without the requested arrow head. >> > Man, you read my mind. I was trying to solve the exact same problem

Re: Arrow on cross-staves arpeggio

2017-01-18 Thread Caio Giovaneti de Barros
The above doesn't work: it produces an arpeggiando sign across the two staves as required, but without the requested arrow head. Man, you read my mind. I was trying to solve the exact same problem just now. Caio ___ lilypond-user mailing list

Arrow on cross-staves arpeggio

2017-01-18 Thread David Sumbler
% \version "2.19.48" \new PianoStaff <<   \set PianoStaff.connectArpeggios = ##t   \new Staff { \arpeggioArrowUp 1\arpeggio   }   \new Staff { \arpeggioArrowUp \clef "bass" 1\arpeggio   } >> % The above doesn't work: it produces an arpeggiando sign across the two