On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 07:31:26AM -0600, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
On 4/17/09 7:26 AM, Ian Hulin i...@hulin.org.uk wrote:
I'll comment on the bits I feel qualified on: the documentation bits.
It's taken me while following the threads on lilypond-devel and
lilypond-user to work out
On 4/19/09 1:16 AM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 07:31:26AM -0600, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
I think it's been a great learning process for everybody involved,
but I personally would work on either personal stuff (I want it!),
popular-requested
On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 08:29:45AM -0600, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
On 4/19/09 1:16 AM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca
wrote:
I think it's been a great learning process for everybody
involved, but I personally would work on either personal stuff
(I want it!), popular-requested
Hi Carl,
I've posted a patch for approval that implements variable thickness
dashed
and part-dashed, part-solid slurs. I hope it will be fully
implemented in 2.13.1.
When I posted my comment about this, I never imagined it would get
solved so quickly.
Amazing!
As a preview, here's
Hi Carl,
I'll comment on the bits I feel qualified on: the documentation bits.
It's taken me while following the threads on lilypond-devel and
lilypond-user to work out */why/* this has been developed.
The most common use seems to be so you can notate a phrase where notes
have varying
Dear LilyPond users,
I've posted a patch for approval that implements variable thickness dashed
and part-dashed, part-solid slurs. I hope it will be fully implemented in
2.13.1.
As a preview, here's some slurs that were output by the new code.
Please let me know if these are acceptable, or if
Actually, the tie calls the slur code, so I think it's already done. But
I'll check it out more thoroughly.
Carl
On 4/16/09 10:27 PM, David Stocker dstoc...@thenotesetter.com wrote:
Righteous.
Not to impede your efforts, but can the same idea be applied to
ties--the variable thickness,
