On Fri, 2012-01-20 at 18:38 +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
David Raleigh Arnold d...@openguitar.com writes:
Copyrighted material is intended to have
a useful life after the expiration of copyright, not
to be useless, like CP/M or Windows 3.2 or 98 for example.
There is not much of a point
On Thu, 2012-01-19 at 22:11 +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
David Raleigh Arnold d...@openguitar.com writes:
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 22:52:03 +0100, Hans Aberg wrote:
On 19 Jan 2012, at 21:58, David Raleigh Arnold wrote:
On Thu, 2012-01-19 at 11:05 -0800, Bernardo Barros wrote:
Open software
David Raleigh Arnold d...@openguitar.com writes:
Copyrighted material is intended to have
a useful life after the expiration of copyright, not
to be useless, like CP/M or Windows 3.2 or 98 for example.
There is not much of a point for topical newspaper articles being
copyrighted until 90
PMA wrote:
...
Yes, I've sniffed posted in IMSLP's site now -- enough to see
that my public-domain-like status fears were misconceived,
and to appreciate the gist of licenses being offered. I tend to
expect that their 6th listed,
Attribution + Non-commercial + No Derivatives
would do me just
On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 15:02 -0500, PMA wrote:
David Raleigh Arnold wrote:
Your last sentence here hits on *the* issue in my original post.
Why indeed would I...? But it seems that, to post on ISMLP/
WIMA, one *must* commit to public-domain-like status.
I would like, of course, to find
Open software people tend to consider artists as being
equivalent to programmers, so they think artists
should starve. I have no sympathy with that view.
Obviously. Knowledge should be free, Yale to the
contrary. Art shouldn't be free until the artist gets his.
The source code of the
PMA-2 wrote:
David Raleigh Arnold wrote:
But it seems that, to post on ISMLP/
WIMA, one *must* commit to public-domain-like status.
I would like, of course, to find a (major, well run) public archive
without such constraints.
Have you actually spoken to anyone over at IMSLP about
Hayden Muhl wrote:
PMA-2 wrote:
David Raleigh Arnold wrote:
But it seems that, to post on ISMLP/
WIMA, one *must* commit to public-domain-like status.
I would like, of course, to find a (major, well run) public archive
without such constraints.
Have you actually spoken to anyone over
On Thu, 2012-01-19 at 11:05 -0800, Bernardo Barros wrote:
Open software people tend to consider artists as being
equivalent to programmers, so they think artists
should starve. I have no sympathy with that view.
Obviously. Knowledge should be free, Yale to the
contrary. Art shouldn't be
current ISP address (as long as I keep Yale apprised of it).
David Raleigh Arnold wrote:
On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 15:02 -0500, PMA wrote:
David Raleigh Arnold wrote:
Your last sentence here hits on *the* issue in my original post.
Why indeed would I...? But it seems that, to post on ISMLP/
WIMA
David Raleigh Arnold d...@openguitar.com writes:
On Thu, 2012-01-19 at 11:05 -0800, Bernardo Barros wrote:
Open software people tend to consider artists as being
equivalent to programmers, so they think artists
should starve. I have no sympathy with that view.
Obviously. Knowledge should
On 19 Jan 2012, at 21:58, David Raleigh Arnold wrote:
On Thu, 2012-01-19 at 11:05 -0800, Bernardo Barros wrote:
Open software people tend to consider artists as being
equivalent to programmers, so they think artists
should starve. I have no sympathy with that view.
Obviously. Knowledge
On 18 Jan 2012, at 01:54, PMA wrote:
Thanks Hans. As I (don't really) understand, ISMLP requires
a contributor of copyrighted materials to agree to their being
licensed *as* public domain.
Obviously for a clear view, I've got more homework ahead
Public domain means that the copyright
PMA peterarmstr...@aya.yale.edu writes:
Thanks Hans. As I (don't really) understand, ISMLP requires
a contributor of copyrighted materials to agree to their being
licensed *as* public domain.
That would be weird since several countries do not even have a concept
of public domain in their
PMA peterarmstr...@aya.yale.edu writes:
Jay Anderson wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 5:54 PM, PMApeterarmstr...@aya.yale.edu wrote:
Thanks Hans. As I (don't really) understand, ISMLP requires
a contributor of copyrighted materials to agree to their being
licensed *as* public domain.
IMSLP
David, Hans, Chris --
These are the perspectives I need.
Thanks for your patience!
Pete
David Kastrup wrote:
PMApeterarmstr...@aya.yale.edu writes:
Jay Anderson wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 5:54 PM, PMApeterarmstr...@aya.yale.edu wrote:
Thanks Hans. As I (don't really) understand,
PMA wrote:
David, Hans, Chris --
These are the perspectives I need.
Thanks for your patience!
Pete
...
David, Hans, Chris --
These are the perspectives I've needed.
Thanks for your patience!
Pete
Sorry, forgot to erase my top-post after copying it to the bottom.
PMA peterarmstr...@aya.yale.edu writes:
PMA wrote:
David, Hans, Chris --
These are the perspectives I need.
Thanks for your patience!
Pete
...
David, Hans, Chris --
These are the perspectives I've needed.
Thanks for your patience!
Pete
Sorry, forgot to erase my top-post after
David Kastrup wrote:
PMApeterarmstr...@aya.yale.edu writes:
PMA wrote:
David, Hans, Chris --
These are the perspectives I need.
Thanks for your patience!
Pete
...
David, Hans, Chris --
These are the perspectives I've needed.
Thanks for your patience!
Pete
Sorry, forgot to erase
It is pretty creative - I haven't seen that before! :-)
Hans
On 18 Jan 2012, at 19:37, PMA wrote:
Sorry, forgot to erase my top-post after copying it to the bottom.
It is pretty creative - I haven't seen that before! :-)
Hans
___
lilypond-user
me
Hans Aberg wrote:
It is pretty creative - I haven't seen that before! :-)
Hans
On 18 Jan 2012, at 19:37, PMA wrote:
Sorry, forgot to erase my top-post after copying it to the bottom.
It is pretty creative - I haven't seen that before! :-)
Hans
neither
Oh -- all *my* compositions. Sorry, I should have thought to specify this.
Shane Brandes wrote:
Do you mean by your scores? your compositions or your typesetting of
other's compositions?
Shane
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 9:00 PM, PMApeterarmstr...@aya.yale.edu wrote:
P.S. Selling is not an
PMA peterarmstr...@aya.yale.edu writes:
Oh -- all *my* compositions. Sorry, I should have thought to specify
this.
Well, you said you don't care about royalties. So apparently what you
do care about is artistic integrity. The question is how you can
achieve your goals while providing a
Francisco Vila wrote:
2012/1/17 PMApeterarmstr...@aya.yale.edu:
Thanks for your response. But I see that we are way apart on this.
Adapting/customizing the result is exactly what I mean to prevent.
I want these products closed indeed. Naturally, unrealized scoring
improvements will remain on
David Kastrup wrote:
PMApeterarmstr...@aya.yale.edu writes:
Oh -- all *my* compositions. Sorry, I should have thought to specify
this.
Well, you said you don't care about royalties. So apparently what you
do care about is artistic integrity. The question is how you can
achieve your goals
PMA peterarmstr...@aya.yale.edu writes:
David Kastrup wrote:
If your work was worth writing, it will certainly also be worth
thinking about the form in which you consider it best to make it
available.
All the best
Thank you David, I will digest all this.
Thanks for caring!
--
David
On Sun, 2012-01-15 at 20:26 -0500, PMA wrote:
Hi List.
I'm considering posting my scores on WIMA (now via ISMLP),
and would much appreciate comment from any of you who
have had experience in going that route.
Make sure your midi, if any, has a copyright notice. Lilypond does
not put one in
On 16 Jan 2012, at 02:26, PMA wrote:
I'm considering posting my scores on WIMA (now via ISMLP),
and would much appreciate comment from any of you who
have had experience in going that route.
Most especialy, I'm wondering what regrets you may have
faced after agreeing to the diluted
would I...? But it seems that, to post on ISMLP/
WIMA, one *must* commit to public-domain-like status.
I would like, of course, to find a (major, well run) public archive
without such constraints.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
here hits on *the* issue in my original post.
Why indeed would I...?
I suspect he was being ironical.
But it seems that, to post on ISMLP/
WIMA, one *must* commit to public-domain-like status.
Only public domain is public domain. Attribution licenses grant you
attribution rights. Other clauses
On 17 January 2012 21:02, PMA peterarmstr...@aya.yale.edu wrote:
Your last sentence here hits on *the* issue in my original post.
Why indeed would I...? But it seems that, to post on ISMLP/
WIMA, one *must* commit to public-domain-like status.
I wish that was true!!
As a Free Culture
Thanks Hans. As I (don't really) understand, ISMLP requires
a contributor of copyrighted materials to agree to their being
licensed *as* public domain.
Obviously for a clear view, I've got more homework ahead
Hans Aberg wrote:
On 16 Jan 2012, at 02:26, PMA wrote:
I'm considering
last sentence here hits on *the* issue in my original post.
Why indeed would I...?
I suspect he was being ironical.
But it seems that, to post on ISMLP/
WIMA, one *must* commit to public-domain-like status.
Only public domain is public domain. Attribution licenses grant you
attribution rights
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 5:54 PM, PMA peterarmstr...@aya.yale.edu wrote:
Thanks Hans. As I (don't really) understand, ISMLP requires
a contributor of copyrighted materials to agree to their being
licensed *as* public domain.
IMSLP allows submission of items in the public domain and items under
Xavier Scheuer wrote:
On 17 January 2012 21:02, PMApeterarmstr...@aya.yale.edu wrote:
Your last sentence here hits on *the* issue in my original post.
Why indeed would I...? But it seems that, to post on ISMLP/
WIMA, one *must* commit to public-domain-like status.
I wish that was true
Jay Anderson wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 5:54 PM, PMApeterarmstr...@aya.yale.edu wrote:
Thanks Hans. As I (don't really) understand, ISMLP requires
a contributor of copyrighted materials to agree to their being
licensed *as* public domain.
IMSLP allows submission of items in the public
On 18/01/12 11:54, PMA wrote:
Thanks Hans. As I (don't really) understand, ISMLP requires
a contributor of copyrighted materials to agree to their being
licensed *as* public domain.
Well, from the FAQ on the IMSLP web site: All scores submitted to IMSLP
either belong to the public domain, or
On 01/17/2012 08:21 PM, PMA wrote:
What I want -- irony and caricature aside -- is to have my finished
scores accessible, freely available for download performance, and
meanwhile reasonably protected from desecration. From your words I
gather that, with regard to any public site, this a
P.S. By scores I mean only PDFs (not also their .ly sources).
PMA wrote:
Hi List.
I'm considering posting my scores on WIMA (now via ISMLP),
and would much appreciate comment from any of you who
have had experience in going that route.
Most especialy, I'm wondering what regrets you may have
2012/1/16 PMA peterarmstr...@aya.yale.edu:
P.S. By scores I mean only PDFs (not also their .ly sources).
Publish the sources along the scores. Without the sources the user can
not adapt/customize the result, can not study how are they made and
nobody learns a bit. Your work is yours and you
P.S. Selling is not an issue.
PMA wrote:
Thanks for your response. But I see that we are way apart on this.
Adapting/customizing the result is exactly what I mean to prevent.
I want these products closed indeed. Naturally, unrealized scoring
improvements will remain on my head.
Francisco
Thanks for your response. But I see that we are way apart on this.
Adapting/customizing the result is exactly what I mean to prevent.
I want these products closed indeed. Naturally, unrealized scoring
improvements will remain on my head.
Francisco Vila wrote:
2012/1/16
Do you mean by your scores? your compositions or your typesetting of
other's compositions?
Shane
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 9:00 PM, PMA peterarmstr...@aya.yale.edu wrote:
P.S. Selling is not an issue.
PMA wrote:
Thanks for your response. But I see that we are way apart on this.
2012/1/17 PMA peterarmstr...@aya.yale.edu:
Thanks for your response. But I see that we are way apart on this.
Adapting/customizing the result is exactly what I mean to prevent.
I want these products closed indeed. Naturally, unrealized scoring
improvements will remain on my head.
But nobody
Hi List.
I'm considering posting my scores on WIMA (now via ISMLP),
and would much appreciate comment from any of you who
have had experience in going that route.
Most especialy, I'm wondering what regrets you may have
faced after agreeing to the diluted copyright protections.
Thanks in
45 matches
Mail list logo
