LilyPond logo

Hi all, I saw the recent dialog about LilyPond logo's. I created one several years ago, and it is used in the LilyPond website (upper left). http://lilypond.org/pictures/lily-home-32x32.png The original (hand drawn in Inkscape by me, copying colors and shapes from the photographed lily flower

Re: LilyPond logo?

On 8 August 2016 at 09:43, Dona Mommsen-Ghosh wrote: > Hi, > > please allow me to share my 2 cents… > I'm an occasional user of LilyPond, and I think a Logo is a great thing > in terms of recognition. However, I fear that Frescobaldi beat you to it. > Since I don’t use Lilypond

Re: LilyPond logo?

nces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org > <mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org>] On Behalf Of > Pierre Perol-Schneider > Sent: Sunday, August 07, 2016 5:14 AM > To: Noeck <noeck.marb...@gmx.de <mailto:noeck.marb...@gmx.de>> > Cc: lilypond-user <

Re: LilyPond logo?

On 07/08/16 20:44, Simon Albrecht wrote: > Or do I have too little faith in crowd intelligence and the aesthetic > reckoning of everybody who likes working with Lilypond? I think you might. It's amazing how everybody seems to be targetting in on just a few possibilities - which are all very

Re: LilyPond logo?

: lilypond-user [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org] ON BEHALF OF Pierre Perol-Schneider SENT: Sunday, August 07, 2016 5:14 AM TO: Noeck CC: lilypond-user SUBJECT: Re: LilyPond logo? pdf 2016-08-07 14:13 GMT+02:00 Pierre Perol-Schneider : Updates. Please select the ones

Re: LilyPond logo?

On 06/08/16 19:38, Pierre Perol-Schneider wrote: > Tests update attached. > I'm still a fan of 6 or 9. But 9 feels better because it's simpler. Cheers, Wol ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org

Re: LilyPond logo?

On 07/08/16 16:17, Kieren MacMillan wrote: > Hello all, > > What about a perspective-sheared bass clef as the leaf? > Just a thought, trying to tie it all together. > +1 Cheers, Wol ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org

Re: LilyPond logo?

Hello all, What about a perspective-sheared bass clef as the leaf? Just a thought, trying to tie it all together. Cheers, Kieren. Kieren MacMillan, composer ‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.info ‣ email: i...@kierenmacmillan.info

RE: LilyPond logo?

> Subject: Re: LilyPond logo? pdf 2016-08-07 14:13 GMT+02:00 Pierre Perol-Schneider <pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com <mailto:pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com> >: Updates. Please select the ones that should be deleted. Cheers Pierre 2016-08-07 9:34 GMT+02:00 Noe

Re: LilyPond logo?

Updates. Please select the ones that should be deleted. Cheers Pierre 2016-08-07 9:34 GMT+02:00 Noeck : > Hi, > > > I was never clear on how the LilyPond name was chosen. Note heads for > > the pads, and note stems for flowers, maybe. > > It's a little bit different (in

Re: LilyPond logo?

Hi, > I was never clear on how the LilyPond name was chosen. Note heads for > the pads, and note stems for flowers, maybe. It's a little bit different (in short: women): http://lilypond.org/~janneke/vc/newweb/out/site/about/name Cheers, Joram ___

Re: LilyPond logo?

On 8/6/2016 11:31 AM, Noeck wrote: > Am 06.08.2016 um 18:25 schrieb Graham Percival: >> Why the emphasis on water flowers in the logo? The important part >> of LilyPond is the beautifully-engraved sheet music, not botany. >> >> I think it would be a nicer approach to having something >>

RE: LilyPond logo?

Subject: Re: LilyPond logo? Tests update enclosed. Cheers, Pierre 2016-08-06 21:06 GMT+02:00 Malte Meyn <lilyp...@maltemeyn.de <mailto:lilyp...@maltemeyn.de> >: Am 06.08.2016 um 17:51 schrieb Malte Meyn: - #8 of course would need a pad to recognise it as a water lily rath

Re: LilyPond logo?

\line { \with-color #red \bold "14. " "Music engraving by" \combine \concat { \hspace #0.5 \musicglyph #"clefs.G" } \raise #0.4 \override #'(thickness . 2.4) \override #'(style . outline) \whiteout \logoMalteSeven #0.5 "LilyPond 2.19.46—www.lilypond.org" } Ok, I should go to bed, probably

Re: LilyPond logo?

Or even: \version "2.19.46" lilypond = \markup\concat { "Lily" \hspace #-.6 \raise #.5 \rotate #170 \fontsize #-4 \musicglyph #"clefs.G" \hspace #-.5 "ond" } \markup { \with-color #red \bold "13. " "Music engraving by" \lilypond " 2.19.46—www.lilypond.org

Re: LilyPond logo?

Am 06.08.2016 um 17:51 schrieb Malte Meyn: - #8 of course would need a pad to recognise it as a water lily rather than a generic flower; this was just a test to demonstrate a more realistic (?) positioning of petals, not a complete logo. Maybe I’ll try to add a pad. Here is an attempt to use

Re: LilyPond logo?

Tests update attached. Cheers, Pierre 2016-08-06 19:20 GMT+02:00 Blöchl Bernhard : > I recommend a simple solution: > Do not use it! > > Am 06.08.2016 18:25, schrieb Graham Percival: > >> Why the emphasis on water flowers in the logo? The important part >> of

Re: LilyPond logo?

I recommend a simple solution: Do not use it! Am 06.08.2016 18:25, schrieb Graham Percival: Why the emphasis on water flowers in the logo? The important part of LilyPond is the beautifully-engraved sheet music, not botany. ___ lilypond-user

Re: LilyPond logo?

Hi All, @ Johan: I fully agree. Done. @ Malte: OK copied. @ Simon: Yes I had the same feeling but I'm stuck there, still trying to find something much better. @ Graham: Ok, good idea but I not fully agree with the 'botany' reason (any direct link between an apple and a computer ?) Tests

Re: LilyPond logo?

Am 06.08.2016 um 18:25 schrieb Graham Percival: > Why the emphasis on water flowers in the logo? The important part > of LilyPond is the beautifully-engraved sheet music, not botany. > > I think it would be a nicer approach to having something > recognizably "sheet music" in the logo. +1

Re: LilyPond logo?

Why the emphasis on water flowers in the logo? The important part of LilyPond is the beautifully-engraved sheet music, not botany. I think it would be a nicer approach to having something recognizably "sheet music" in the logo. For example, simply "Lp", with the "p" being in the normal dynamic

Re: LilyPond logo?

Am 06.08.2016 um 17:11 schrieb Pierre Perol-Schneider: Plus pdf 2016-08-06 17:10 GMT+02:00 Pierre Perol-Schneider : Logo test enclosed. Basically, the only one I'd fancy is No. 6, except the flower now looks like an explosion, or the splash of a stone thrown in water :-) Best,

Re: LilyPond logo?

Am 06.08.2016 um 17:11 schrieb Pierre Perol-Schneider: Plus pdf 2016-08-06 17:10 GMT+02:00 Pierre Perol-Schneider < pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com>: Logo test enclosed. Cheers, Pierre My opinions: - #5 is much better than both #3 and #2 (and #1) because it’s more realistic (no

Re: LilyPond logo?

On Sat, 6 Aug 2016 17:11:26 +0200 Pierre Perol-Schneider wrote: > Plus pdf Bij far: Number 9, provided the lily lines are a bit thinner, and the leaves individually drawn. Printers today have resolutions of 600dpi and higher so no need for such a thick lines.

Re: LilyPond logo?

Plus pdf 2016-08-06 17:10 GMT+02:00 Pierre Perol-Schneider < pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com>: > Logo test enclosed. > > Cheers, > Pierre > > 2016-08-06 15:32 GMT+02:00 Carl Sorensen : > >> >> >> On 8/5/16 11:28 AM, "Simon Albrecht" wrote: >> >> >Am

Re: LilyPond logo?

Logo test enclosed. Cheers, Pierre 2016-08-06 15:32 GMT+02:00 Carl Sorensen : > > > On 8/5/16 11:28 AM, "Simon Albrecht" wrote: > > >Am 05.08.2016 um 15:50 schrieb Mark Knoop: > > > At 14:40 on 05 Aug 2016, Phil Holmes wrote: > > >> - Original

Re: LilyPond logo?

On 8/5/16 11:28 AM, "Simon Albrecht" wrote: >Am 05.08.2016 um 15:50 schrieb Mark Knoop: > > At 14:40 on 05 Aug 2016, Phil Holmes wrote: > >> - Original Message - > >> From: Andrew Bernard > >>> I also note that there does not seem to be consistency as to whether

Re: LilyPond logo?

On 8/5/16 7:50 AM, "Mark Knoop" wrote: >At 14:40 on 05 Aug 2016, Phil Holmes wrote: >>- Original Message - >>From: Andrew Bernard >>> I also note that there does not seem to be consistency as to whether >>> lilypond is >>> ŒLilypond¹ or ŒLilyPond¹ or ŒLily Pond¹ or

Re: LilyPond logo?

>> >> https://www.iconfinder.com/icons/566750/ecology_flower_flowers_green_lily_nature_water-lily_icon#size=512 > > This icon is for sale at $1 ... … with a license saying: The Licensed Material may not be: * ... * Incorporated into a logo or other trademark

Re: LilyPond logo?

On Sat, 06 Aug 2016 01:38:58 +0200 (CEST) Werner LEMBERG wrote: > >> Looks promising! Can you adjust the `packman' to have a softer gap? > > > > “softer”? shorter? narrower? Sorry, I don’t know what you mean ... > > Something similar to the waterlily logo at > > >

Re: LilyPond logo?

> I still can't get pacman out of my mind ... you don't get that effect with > the colour graphic because the colours are wrong, but as soon as it goes > b ... > > Cheers, > Wol > As an long-time, avid pacman fan (although really more of a Ms. pacman guy), I submit that none of these designs look

Re: LilyPond logo?

ood ideas can be fixed. More important is whether the imagery supports the "brand" of the entity. > I still do not see why the web graphic waterlily has suddenly been assumed > to be the lilypond ‘logo’. > "a symbol or other design adopted by an organization to identi

Re: LilyPond logo?

>> Looks promising! Can you adjust the `packman' to have a softer gap? > > “softer”? shorter? narrower? Sorry, I don’t know what you mean ... Something similar to the waterlily logo at https://www.iconfinder.com/icons/566750/ecology_flower_flowers_green_lily_nature_water-lily_icon#size=512

Re: LilyPond logo?

Am 05.08.2016 um 22:59 schrieb Werner LEMBERG: But maybe less is more and two flower layers are enough; so here is a combination of logo3 and logo4 (only two flower layers -> less detail, only one pad but with gap -> more typical). Looks promising! Can you adjust the `packman' to have a

Re: LilyPond logo?

> But maybe less is more and two flower layers are enough; so here is > a combination of logo3 and logo4 (only two flower layers -> less > detail, only one pad but with gap -> more typical). Looks promising! Can you adjust the `packman' to have a softer gap? Werner

Re: LilyPond logo?

From: Henning Hraban Ramm <lilypon...@fiee.net> Subject: Re: LilyPond logo? Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2016 21:40:23 +0200 > > Am 2016-08-05 um 19:29 schrieb Noeck <noeck.marb...@gmx.de>: > >>> https://www.iconfinder.com/icons/566749/flora_flower_flowers_green_lily_plant_w

Re: LilyPond logo?

Am 2016-08-05 um 19:29 schrieb Noeck : >> https://www.iconfinder.com/icons/566749/flora_flower_flowers_green_lily_plant_water-lily_icon > > This one is a well-designed icon (IMHO). Thank you, that’s what I had in mind when I read the OP’s question. Unfortunately we can’t

Re: LilyPond logo?

The problem is the black lilyleaf looks like pacman. I notice that the more the split in the leaf is rotated to point down, the less it looks like a mouth (so the less it looks like pacman). The alternative - two leaves - feels unnatural. Cheers, Wol On 05/08/16 10:05, Malte Meyn wrote:

Re: LilyPond logo?

I like the first and last ones. The first is closer to the web graphic, but I think I prefer the last one. I still can't get pacman out of my mind ... you don't get that effect with the colour graphic because the colours are wrong, but as soon as it goes b ... Cheers, Wol On 05/08/16

Re: LilyPond logo?

> https://www.iconfinder.com/icons/566749/flora_flower_flowers_green_lily_plant_water-lily_icon This one is a well-designed icon (IMHO). ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: LilyPond logo?

Am 05.08.2016 um 15:50 schrieb Mark Knoop: > At 14:40 on 05 Aug 2016, Phil Holmes wrote: >> - Original Message - >> From: Andrew Bernard >>> I also note that there does not seem to be consistency as to whether >>> lilypond is >>> 'Lilypond' or 'LilyPond' or 'Lily Pond' or 'lilypond'.

Re: LilyPond logo?

nly been > assumed > > to be the lilypond ‘logo’. > > To my knowledge it is the only graphic representation of the LilyPond > project. > I think it sort of made its way as the official unofficial logo. > > > One could always say that I am free to not use a logo, but t

Re: LilyPond logo?

Hi Andrew, > I still do not see why the web graphic waterlily has suddenly been assumed > to be the lilypond ‘logo’. To my knowledge it is the only graphic representation of the LilyPond project. I think it sort of made its way as the official unofficial logo. > One could always say

Re: LilyPond logo?

Am 05.08.2016 um 16:27 schrieb Johan Vromans: On Fri, 5 Aug 2016 14:01:26 +0200 Malte Meyn wrote: But maybe less is more and two flower layers are enough; so here is a combination of logo3 and logo4 (only two flower layers -> less detail, only one pad but with gap ->

Re: LilyPond logo?

On Fri, 5 Aug 2016 14:01:26 +0200 Malte Meyn wrote: > But maybe less is more and two flower layers are enough; so here is a > combination of logo3 and logo4 (only two flower layers -> less detail, > only one pad but with gap -> more typical). Yes, simplicity is better.

Re: LilyPond logo?

Hi Andrew (et al.), > Logos are for branding and marketing. Why do we need one? Because we want to brand and market LilyPond/Lilypond/Lily Pond. ;) Like it or not, wider acceptance and use of the application — which is a stated goal of many of its users and developers, and an implied goal of

Re: LilyPond logo?

At 14:40 on 05 Aug 2016, Phil Holmes wrote: >- Original Message - >From: Andrew Bernard >> I also note that there does not seem to be consistency as to whether >> lilypond is >> ‘Lilypond’ or ‘LilyPond’ or ‘Lily Pond’ or ‘lilypond’. That at least >> needs to be straightened out. >

Re: LilyPond logo?

- Original Message - From: Andrew Bernard I also note that there does not seem to be consistency as to whether lilypond is ‘Lilypond’ or ‘LilyPond’ or ‘Lily Pond’ or ‘lilypond’. That at least needs to be straightened out. LilyPond. Check the front page of the website. -- Phil

Re: LilyPond logo?

a logo by committee is, as I pointed out in my early post, hugely time consuning and expensive of people’s resources, and ends up universally in the lowest common denominator product. I still do not see why the web graphic waterlily has suddenly been assumed to be the lilypond ‘logo’. I still do

Re: LilyPond logo?

Am 2016-08-05 um 14:40 schrieb Pierre Perol-Schneider : > Here's tests with the different proposition. > I've added mine at last but I'm not satisfied yet. While I like the bold stylized look of the other attempts, I find your version most suitable with

Re: LilyPond logo?

2016-08-05 14:57 GMT+02:00 Simon Albrecht : > Am 05.08.2016 um 14:40 schrieb Pierre Perol-Schneider: >> Here's tests with the different proposition. >> I've added mine at last but I'm not satisfied yet. > > Wow, I like yours a lot. As I said in the other sub-thread, we

Re: LilyPond logo?

On 2016-08-05 14:56, Malte Meyn wrote: Am 05.08.2016 um 14:36 schrieb Alexander Kobel: Looking at the "original" picture from a distance, I perceive the center as only one colored patch. Would you mind trying a version with just one dot in the center? I used the five dots because the center

Re: LilyPond logo?

Am 05.08.2016 um 14:40 schrieb Pierre Perol-Schneider: Here's tests with the different proposition. I've added mine at last but I'm not satisfied yet. That’s nice too. A bit more vivid than my “I’ve never really used inkscape before but the star tool is nice” experiments ;) Did you draw

Re: LilyPond logo?

Am 05.08.2016 um 14:40 schrieb Pierre Perol-Schneider: > Hi All, > > Here's tests with the different proposition. > I've added mine at last but I'm not satisfied yet. Wow, I like yours a lot. As I said in the other sub-thread, we should designate the task of finding a logo to a small group

Re: LilyPond logo?

Am 05.08.2016 um 10:43 schrieb Malte Meyn: > Am 04.08.2016 um 16:43 schrieb Carl Sorensen: >> On 8/4/16 7:10 AM, "Andrew Bernard" wrote: >>> Does lilypond actually need visual >>> branding? Are we trying to increase market share with a logo? > > I think it would be nice to have. As I said

Re: LilyPond logo?

Am 05.08.2016 um 14:36 schrieb Alexander Kobel: Looking at the "original" picture from a distance, I perceive the center as only one colored patch. Would you mind trying a version with just one dot in the center? I used the five dots because the center of a flower has much detail. A single

Re: LilyPond logo?

Hi All, Here's tests with the different proposition. I've added mine at last but I'm not satisfied yet. Cheers, Pierre 2016-08-05 14:36 GMT+02:00 Alexander Kobel : > Malte, > > I think you did a really nice job there. However, I can't help but be > reminded of > >

Re: LilyPond logo?

Malte, I think you did a really nice job there. However, I can't help but be reminded of https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:3_schwarze_Punkte_auf_gelbem_Grund_2.svg by the dots in the center... (For those in non-German-speaking countries: that's the symbol blind people wear in public as a

Re: LilyPond logo?

Am 05.08.2016 um 14:01 schrieb Malte Meyn: [...] But maybe less is more and two flower layers are enough; so here is a combination of logo3 and logo4 (only two flower layers -> less detail, only one pad but with gap -> more typical). I like it! Marc

Re: LilyPond logo?

Am 05.08.2016 um 13:52 schrieb Marc Hohl: Am 05.08.2016 um 11:38 schrieb Werner LEMBERG: Here are some experiments of mine. Very nice! logo1.svg is the one I used in the score, logo_outline.svg is the outline version, logo2/3/4.svg are some attempts to make it simpler. I like logo3

Re: LilyPond logo?

Am 05.08.2016 um 11:38 schrieb Werner LEMBERG: Here are some experiments of mine. Very nice! logo1.svg is the one I used in the score, logo_outline.svg is the outline version, logo2/3/4.svg are some attempts to make it simpler. I like logo3 most. +1 Marc

Re: LilyPond logo?

> Here are some experiments of mine. Very nice! > logo1.svg is the one I used in the score, logo_outline.svg is the > outline version, logo2/3/4.svg are some attempts to make it simpler. I like logo3 most. Werner ___ lilypond-user mailing list

Re: LilyPond logo?

Am 05.08.2016 um 10:28 schrieb Wols Lists: On 05/08/16 05:15, tyronicus wrote: The vectorized image looks very good. It'd be nice, though, to have some sort of "icon" logo in true black and white. Maybe something like the attached? It's an Inkscape svg if anyone wants to mess with it. lp.png

Re: LilyPond logo?

Am 04.08.2016 um 16:43 schrieb Carl Sorensen: On 8/4/16 7:10 AM, "Andrew Bernard" wrote: Does lilypond actually need visual branding? Are we trying to increase market share with a logo? I think it would be nice to have. As I said in my first post, an eye catcher

Re: LilyPond logo?

On 05/08/16 05:15, tyronicus wrote: > The vectorized image looks very good. It'd be nice, though, to have some sort > of "icon" logo in true black and white. Maybe something like the attached? > It's an Inkscape svg if anyone wants to mess with it. > > lp.png

Re: LilyPond logo?

; lp.svg <http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n193438/lp.svg> -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/LilyPond-logo-tp193408p193438.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user

Re: LilyPond logo?

I appreciated the b/w line version more. Regards Am 04.08.2016 um 15:59 schrieb Pierre Perol-Schneider: Hi Ralph, Here you go. 2016-08-04 14:40 GMT+02:00 Ralph Palmer >: On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 8:31 AM, Pierre

Re: LilyPond logo?

On 8/4/16 7:10 AM, "Andrew Bernard" <andrew.bern...@gmail.com> wrote: >There seems to be an assumption here that the logo _is_ the waterlily >graphic on the webpage, and that it is just a matter of coding it up. I >am not sure that this is the formal lilypond logo, is i

Re: LilyPond logo?

Hi Andrew, 2016-08-04 15:10 GMT+02:00 Andrew Bernard : > There seems to be an assumption here that the logo _is_ the waterlily > graphic on the webpage, and that it is just a matter of coding it up. > ... See : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:LilyPond-logo.png

Re: LilyPond logo?

Hi Ralph, Here you go. 2016-08-04 14:40 GMT+02:00 Ralph Palmer : > On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 8:31 AM, Pierre Perol-Schneider < > pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Here's a gray scale version. >> Lighter by far. >> >> \version "2.19.46" >> \include

Re: LilyPond logo?

There seems to be an assumption here that the logo _is_ the waterlily graphic on the webpage, and that it is just a matter of coding it up. I am not sure that this is the formal lilypond logo, is it? Has that been decided or discussed? In any case, does it convey the brand clearly and recognisably

Re: LilyPond logo?

On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 8:31 AM, Pierre Perol-Schneider < pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com> wrote: > Here's a gray scale version. > Lighter by far. > > \version "2.19.46" > \include "logo-gray.ily" > > %% Syntax is \markup\logoGray #size > %% Test: > \markup\logoGray #5 > > I've already tried an

Re: LilyPond logo?

Here's a gray scale version. Lighter by far. \version "2.19.46" \include "logo-gray.ily" %% Syntax is \markup\logoGray #size %% Test: \markup\logoGray #5 I've already tried an outlined b/w version but I'm not satisfied with it yet. Cheers, Pierre 2016-08-04 13:26 GMT+02:00 bb

Re: LilyPond logo?

If any logo, I prefer the b/w version! I never print music sheets with a colour printer. Regards Am 04.08.2016 um 13:17 schrieb Pierre Perol-Schneider: Hi Malte, Hi All Here's a first attempt to produce a vectorialised logo. The file uses the new v2.19 markup path syntax. I've reduced the

Re: LilyPond logo?

Am 03.08.2016 um 18:07 schrieb Pierre-Luc Gauthier: 2016-08-03 11:03 GMT-04:00 Andrew Bernard : The concept is fine I am sure, but the execution difficult, and acceptance problematical. I know it’s difficult but does that mean one cannot try? Logo design is fraught

Re: LilyPond logo?

2016-08-03 11:03 GMT-04:00 Andrew Bernard : > The concept is fine I am sure, but the execution difficult, and acceptance > problematical. So as with most artistic and identity related questions. :-( > Logo design is fraught with difficulty, and you will inevitably end

Re: LilyPond logo?

Hi Malte, The concept is fine I am sure, but the execution difficult, and acceptance problematical. Take for example the massive amount of work that went into, just by way of pertinent example, the Creative Commons logo:

Re: LilyPond logo?

Am 03.08.2016 um 16:13 schrieb Malte Meyn: b/w vector graphic as a logo for LilyPond This could also be part of the Feta font. \markup \musicglyph #"logo.waterlily" ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org

Re: LilyPond logo?

Hi Malte, > wouldn’t it be nice to have an official b/w vector graphic as a logo for > LilyPond? Any opinions? I *love* this idea! Currently, the standard Colophon in all of my scores is …but I would *love* to have a little Lilypond logo there! Thanks!

LilyPond logo?

to be no LilyPond logo I could use (if so, I would look at the license before using it of course). So for testing I made the image you can find in the attached score. Of course it isn’t very good, too many details etc. But wouldn’t it be nice to have an official b/w vector graphic as a logo for LilyPond? Any

Re: Licence LilyPond Logo?

The term "Powered by" is already in use for Emacs Org Mode in which the site was built, so this might cause confusion too. But I could take a picture of our lily pond in the garden and put it on the site with some bars of a score I made underneath. This should be different enough to be

Re: Licence LilyPond Logo?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 You might care to have a quick look at https://www.apache.org/foundation/press/kit/#plain-feather-powered-by-ap ache-logo for an idea. Apache are reasonably protective of their logo, but encourage users to 'proudly display “Powered By Apache” assets

Re: Licence LilyPond Logo?

The original photo of the [single] lilypad is by Krista Scott-Dixon (stumptuous.com). Taken at the Van Dusen Botanical Garden situated in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Somebody made a double lilypad from the photo. Later, saturation and contrast were improved by another person. John

Re: Licence LilyPond Logo?

It's not my intention to confuse or even offend anyone by using the Logo on my tiny tutorial site. Although I make it pretty clear right at the beginning that it has nothing to do with the offical docs, people may skip this. I probably should go looking for another eye-catcher. cheers Marco

Re: Licence LilyPond Logo?

Marco Heins <marco.he...@posteo.de> writes: > Hi everybody, > > I'm currently working on a free tutorial about notation typesetting > with LilyPond for classical guitar. I was wondering if it would be > violating the licence if I show the nice LilyPond Logo on top of my >

Re: Licence LilyPond Logo?

On 20.03.2016 14:51, Marco Heins wrote: Hi everybody, I'm currently working on a free tutorial about notation typesetting with LilyPond for classical guitar. I was wondering if it would be violating the licence if I show the nice LilyPond Logo on top of my tutorial? I don’t know how exactly

Licence LilyPond Logo?

Hi everybody, I'm currently working on a free tutorial about notation typesetting with LilyPond for classical guitar. I was wondering if it would be violating the licence if I show the nice LilyPond Logo on top of my tutorial? cheers Marco