Re: Question about missing accidentals, and banishing stems

2012-03-27 Thread Robert Schmaus
Am 3/27/12 2:15 AM, schrieb Michael Welsh Duggan: Robert Schmausrobert.schm...@web.de writes: the whole music is defined in a single cadenza with manual barlines in between. so, from pov of lilypond, all the music is in one bar, thus, the second ees doesn't sport an accidental. Thank you.

Re: Question about missing accidentals, and banishing stems

2012-03-27 Thread Francisco Vila
2012/3/27 Robert Schmaus robert.schm...@web.de: The transposed version is absolute rubbish ... Not so, if there is a key which is also transposed. Keys are usually transposed too, right? \score { \new Staff { \clef treble %\key f \major \cadenzaOn \relative c' { \key

Re: Question about missing accidentals, and banishing stems

2012-03-27 Thread Robert Schmaus
of course - the correct approach would have been to transpose the whole staff instead of just a bar ... 10 points go to spain, I guess ... On Tue, Mar 27, 2012, at 09:27 AM, Francisco Vila wrote: 2012/3/27 Robert Schmaus robert.schm...@web.de: The transposed version is absolute rubbish ...

Re: Question about missing accidentals, and banishing stems

2012-03-27 Thread Francisco Vila
2012/3/27 Robert Schmaus robert.schm...@web.de: of course - the correct approach would have been to transpose the whole staff instead of just a bar ... 10 points go to spain, I guess ... I'd just like to stress the fact of that LilyPond does a nice job at handling key signatures, accidentals,

Re: Question about missing accidentals, and banishing stems

2012-03-27 Thread Urs Liska
Does the accidental-style forget work for your case? Am 26.03.2012 18:05, schrieb Robert Schmaus: Hi Michael, the whole music is defined in a single cadenza with manual barlines in between. so, from pov of lilypond, all the music is in one bar, thus, the second ees doesn't sport an accidental.

Re: Question about missing accidentals, and banishing stems

2012-03-27 Thread David Kastrup
Michael Welsh Duggan m...@md5i.com writes: I was writing some experimental lilypond in preparation for writing some music functions. The following lilypond file creates two variables which contain a line of notes and a line of lyrics together in a cons cell. The score attempts to join the

Question about missing accidentals, and banishing stems

2012-03-26 Thread Michael Welsh Duggan
I was writing some experimental lilypond in preparation for writing some music functions. The following lilypond file creates two variables which contain a line of notes and a line of lyrics together in a cons cell. The score attempts to join the two. Output is attached. The question is, why

Re: Question about missing accidentals, and banishing stems

2012-03-26 Thread Robert Schmaus
Hi Michael, the whole music is defined in a single cadenza with manual barlines in between. so, from pov of lilypond, all the music is in one bar, thus, the second ees doesn't sport an accidental. Use ees! to force the accidental ... Best, Robert On Sun, Mar 25, 2012, at 09:01 PM, Michael

Re: Question about missing accidentals, and banishing stems

2012-03-26 Thread James
Hello, On 26 March 2012 17:05, Robert Schmaus robert.schm...@web.de wrote: Hi Michael, the whole music is defined in a single cadenza with manual barlines in between. so, from pov of lilypond, all the music is in one bar, thus, the second ees doesn't sport an accidental. Use ees! to force

Re: Question about missing accidentals, and banishing stems

2012-03-26 Thread Michael Welsh Duggan
Robert Schmaus robert.schm...@web.de writes: the whole music is defined in a single cadenza with manual barlines in between. so, from pov of lilypond, all the music is in one bar, thus, the second ees doesn't sport an accidental. Thank you. Quite clear, and fixed in my sources. On Sun, Mar

Re: Question about missing accidentals, and banishing stems

2012-03-26 Thread Michael Welsh Duggan
Michael Welsh Duggan m...@md5i.com writes: Sub-question: I got rid of stems by removing the stem engraver. The slurs, however, look like they are trying to take into account the missing stems. How can I avoid this? It appears that setting the stems to be transparent is superior to removing