Re: Aligning offset quintuplets and triplets

; Unfortunately, that can't be true, as with this interpretation, the > measure is over-full. Rather, the groups of quintuplets/triplets continue, > with a beaming not in sync with the measure's beat structure. > > This also implies that the original engraving isn't mathematically correct >

Re: Aligning offset quintuplets and triplets

s interpretation, the measure is over-full. Rather, the groups of quintuplets/triplets continue, with a beaming not in sync with the measure's beat structure. This also implies that the original engraving isn't mathematically correct (as the beginnings of the bems groups look as if they

Re: Aligning offset quintuplets and triplets

, the groups of quintuplets/triplets continue, with a beaming not in sync with the measure's beat structure. This also implies that the original engraving isn't mathematically correct (as the beginnings of the bems groups look as if they're aligned). Situations like that are hard to approximate

RE: Aligning offset quintuplets and triplets

Knute, Sort of off topic, yet if a rhythmic structure cannot be “felt” why is it written? Mark From: Knute Snortum Sent: Tuesday, December 26, 2023 6:56 PM To: Mark Stephen Mrotek Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Re: Aligning offset quintuplets and triplets Okay, if I code

Re: Aligning offset quintuplets and triplets

Tuesday, December 26, 2023 4:06 PM > *To:* lilypond-user@gnu.org > *Subject:* Aligning offset quintuplets and triplets > > > > I'm having difficulties with a Scriabin etude I'm trying to engrave. I've > attached an image of the first few bars. The challenge is tha

RE: Aligning offset quintuplets and triplets

@gnu.org Subject: Aligning offset quintuplets and triplets I'm having difficulties with a Scriabin etude I'm trying to engrave. I've attached an image of the first few bars. The challenge is that the first notes of the offset quintuplets and triples should line up at the beginning

Aligning offset quintuplets and triplets

alings the notes at the start of the measure and is "mathematically" correct, but the notes at the beginning of the beamed quintuplets and triplets do not align. \version "2.24.3" rightHand = \relative { r2 \tuplet 5/4 4 { r8. e'16[ e e e e] e[ e | e e e] e[ e e e e] e[

Re: Automatic beam behavior for 16th note triplets in 6/8 time

Joseph Srednicki writes: > Hi David: > Thanks for answering my inquiry about beaming 16th-note triplets. > However, it looks provided an example in a file called "js.ly" that > was scrubbed as indicated below. > If the example is not too long and it's not too much

Re: Automatic beam behavior for 16th note triplets in 6/8 time

Hi David: Thanks for answering my inquiry about beaming 16th-note triplets. However, it looks provided an example in a file called "js.ly" that was scrubbed as indicated below. If the example is not too long and it's not too much trouble, can you reply pasting the content of "js.

Re: Automatic beam behavior for 16th note triplets in 6/8 time

Joseph Srednicki writes: > Hello: > > The tiny example below contains a bar of sixteenth-note triplets in > 6/8 time. In this example, I used the "[" and "]" characters to > achieve the desired beaming manually. > > Instead of using the "[" an

Automatic beam behavior for 16th note triplets in 6/8 time

Hello:  The tiny example below contains a bar of sixteenth-note triplets in 6/8 time. In this example, I used the "[" and "]" characters to achieve the desired beaming manually. Instead of using the "[" and "]" characters, what is the correct

Re: Problem with a snippet "shorthand for triplets [0.21429]"

Thank you who replied. Sometime "soon" I will update Lilypond but I will not reply further unless this fails...

Re: Problem with a snippet "shorthand for triplets [0.21429]"

Aaron Hill writes: > On 2022-06-27 6:18 am, Jean Abou Samra wrote: >> The LSR runs LilyPond 2.22 and you have 2.18. You need to upgrade >> LilyPond. Frescobaldi makes it easy to use several versions in >> parallel. > > As far as I can see, the LSR only notes the current version in > Contributing

Re: Problem with a snippet "shorthand for triplets [0.21429]"

On 2022-06-27 6:18 am, Jean Abou Samra wrote: The LSR runs LilyPond 2.22 and you have 2.18. You need to upgrade LilyPond. Frescobaldi makes it easy to use several versions in parallel. As far as I can see, the LSR only notes the current version in Contributing [1]. [1]:

Re: Problem with a snippet "shorthand for triplets [0.21429]"

Le 27/06/2022 à 13:26, mark damerell a écrit : It came from: %% http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=328 Here is part of it: % First version, with a single argument, i.e. the % syntax is \triplet{ c d e } triplet = #(define-music-function (music) (ly:music?)   #{ \tuplet 3/2 $music #})

Problem with a snippet "shorthand for triplets [0.21429]"

It came from: %% http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=328 Here is part of it: % First version, with a single argument, i.e. the % syntax is \triplet{ c d e } triplet = #(define-music-function (music) (ly:music?) #{ \tuplet 3/2 $music #}) \score{ \relative c'{ c4 \triplet {c d e} } }

Re: Various ways to write triplets

b 27, 2022 at 6:17 AM Jean Abou Samra wrote: > > > > Le 27/02/2022 à 10:29, Pierre-Yves Saumont a écrit : > > Hi, > > > > I have always used the following syntax to write triplets: > > > > \tuplet 3/2 {a8 b c) > > > > But when I import MusicXM

Re: Various ways to write triplets

Le 27/02/2022 à 10:29, Pierre-Yves Saumont a écrit : Hi, I have always used the following syntax to write triplets: \tuplet 3/2 {a8 b c) But when I import MusicXML files, tuplets are most often rendered as: \once \omit TupletBracket   \times 2/3  { a8 b8 c8}   } The most surprising

Various ways to write triplets

Hi, I have always used the following syntax to write triplets: \tuplet 3/2 {a8 b c) But when I import MusicXML files, tuplets are most often rendered as: \once \omit TupletBracket \times 2/3 { a8 b8 c8} } The most surprising is that the tuple bracket isn't omitted, and removing "

Re: Trouble with Triplets (Corrected)

On Fri, 2019-08-30 at 14:35 +0200, Michael Gerdau wrote: > > I did indeed examine your code, but that part certainly wasn't > > clear. > >  As I understand it what you wrote is no different from: > > > > \repeat percent 4 { \enterStrictTime \first \leaveStrictTime } > AFAIUI it is > \repeat

Re: Trouble with Triplets (Corrected)

>> When you request strict ruler like time to space relationship then >> how do you expect Lilypond to know when repeated bars are allowed to >> use less space and when not so unless you explicitly say so? > > This makes sense, just not how I originally understood the repeated > bars to behave.  

Re: Trouble with Triplets (Corrected)

On Thu, 2019-08-29 at 21:16 +0100, Timothy Lanfear wrote: > On 29/08/2019 20:57, Stefano Antonelli wrote: > > I feel that it should be possible to scale "something" in lilypond > > to > > do the same thing, but I haven't figured that out yet. > > > Increasing the paper width will achieve what you

Re: Trouble with Triplets (Corrected)

>>> Ideas on how to fix these issues are greatly appreciated. >> Your pattern does not fit 4 times in a line. That's creating some of >> your problems. To circumvent that you could switch between spacing >> settings inside the notes as in the attached example. > > Thank you very much. Could you

Re: Trouble with Triplets (Corrected)

On 29/08/2019 20:57, Stefano Antonelli wrote: I understand that the pattern does not fit 4 times on a line.  How to do so is one of my questions.  Increasing the length of the line doesn't appear to have any effect.  Though theoretically with a large enough paper size it should fit.  Followed

Re: Trouble with Triplets (Corrected)

On Thu, 2019-08-29 at 12:06 +0200, Michael Gerdau wrote: > Hi Stefano, > > > > > Ideas on how to fix these issues are greatly appreciated. > Your pattern does not fit 4 times in a line. That's creating some of > your problems. To circumvent that you could switch between spacing > settings inside

Re: Trouble with Triplets (Corrected)

Hi Stefano, > Ideas on how to fix these issues are greatly appreciated. Your pattern does not fit 4 times in a line. That's creating some of your problems. To circumvent that you could switch between spacing settings inside the notes as in the attached example. For simplicity I've merged all

Trouble with Triplets (Corrected)

Dear List, I've been fighting a problem with horizontal spacing for some time now.  I'm new to lilypond, but I've done my best to read the documentation and I didn't see an obvious answer. The first issue to tackle was getting 4 bars to each line, but I found the bars-per-line-engraver which

Trouble with Triplets

Dear List, I've been fighting a problem with horizontal spacing for some time now.  I'm new to lilypond, but I've done my best to read the documentation and I didn't see an obvious answer. The first issue to tackle was getting 4 bars to each line, but I found the bars-per-line-engraver which

Re: Triplets

2017-01-15 0:21 GMT+01:00 Thomas Morley : > With my lily-2.14.2 I can do in terminal: > > ~$ lilypond-2-14-2 -e '(scm-style-repl)' > GNU LilyPond 2.14.2 > guile> UP > 1 > guile> DOWN > -1 > guile> ly:tuplet-bracket::calc-direction > # > guile> > > All there and

Re: Triplets

Hi, some relevant changes between 2.14 and 2.19 are these: http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/changes/index.html > error: syntax error, unexpected '=', expecting SCM_FUNCTION or SCM_IDENTIFIER > or SCM_TOKEN > \override TupletBracket.stencil > =

Re: Triplets

> On 14 Jan 2017, at 23:42, Simon Albrecht wrote: > > On 14.01.2017 23:34, Hans Aikema wrote: >>> Can you try replacing >>> UP in that line by 1 >>> and DOWN in that line by -1 >>> apparently the version of Lilypond in use does not yet have these constants >>> defined

Re: Triplets

2017-01-14 23:41 GMT+01:00 J Martin Rushton : > > > On 14/01/17 22:34, Hans Aikema wrote: >> >>> On 14 Jan 2017, at 23:32, Hans Aikema wrote: >>> >>> On 14 Jan 2017, at 23:14, J Martin Rushton

Re: Triplets

On 14.01.2017 23:34, Hans Aikema wrote: Can you try replacing UP in that line by 1 and DOWN in that line by -1 apparently the version of Lilypond in use does not yet have these constants defined (values taken from

Re: Triplets

On 14/01/17 22:34, Hans Aikema wrote: > >> On 14 Jan 2017, at 23:32, Hans Aikema wrote: >> >> >>> On 14 Jan 2017, at 23:14, J Martin Rushton >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Progress. That seems to have sorted out the syntax errors but

Re: Triplets

> On 14 Jan 2017, at 23:32, Hans Aikema wrote: > > >> On 14 Jan 2017, at 23:14, J Martin Rushton >> wrote: >> >> >>> >> Progress. That seems to have sorted out the syntax errors but there's >> an issue with one variable: >>

Re: Triplets

> On 14 Jan 2017, at 23:14, J Martin Rushton > wrote: > > >> > Progress. That seems to have sorted out the syntax errors but there's > an issue with one variable: > ---%<-- > Processing `.../file.ly' > Parsing... >

Re: Triplets

On 14/01/17 22:07, Hans Aikema wrote: > >> On 14 Jan 2017, at 22:49, Richard Shann wrote: >> >> On Sat, 2017-01-14 at 21:48 +, J Martin Rushton wrote: >>> >>> On 14/01/17 21:29, Richard Shann wrote: >>> >> >>> I suspect the outer processing or else the low version

Re: Triplets

On 14/01/17 21:49, Richard Shann wrote: > On Sat, 2017-01-14 at 21:48 +, J Martin Rushton wrote: >> >> On 14/01/17 21:29, Richard Shann wrote: >> > >> I suspect the outer processing or else the low version are going to >> waste a lot of time, so I've gone back to using square type

Re: Triplets

> On 14 Jan 2017, at 22:49, Richard Shann wrote: > > On Sat, 2017-01-14 at 21:48 +, J Martin Rushton wrote: >> >> On 14/01/17 21:29, Richard Shann wrote: >> > >> I suspect the outer processing or else the low version are going to >> waste a lot of time, so I've

Re: Triplets

On Sat, 2017-01-14 at 21:48 +, J Martin Rushton wrote: > > On 14/01/17 21:29, Richard Shann wrote: > > I suspect the outer processing or else the low version are going to > waste a lot of time, so I've gone back to using square type brackets, > the slur type were not clear. yes, the first

Re: Triplets

On 14/01/17 21:41, Hans Aikema wrote: > >> On 14 Jan 2017, at 22:33, J Martin Rushton >> wrote: >> >> >> >> On 14/01/17 21:27, Hans Aikema wrote: >>> >>> Op 14 jan. 2017 om 21:51 heeft J Martin Rushton het volgende

Re: Triplets

On 14/01/17 21:29, Richard Shann wrote: > > Here's a complete working example: > 8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8>< > > %% LilyPond file generated by Denemo version 2.0.17 > > %%http://www.gnu.org/software/denemo/ > > \version "2.18.0" > > >

Re: Triplets

> On 14 Jan 2017, at 22:33, J Martin Rushton > wrote: > > > > On 14/01/17 21:27, Hans Aikema wrote: >> >> >>> Op 14 jan. 2017 om 21:51 heeft J Martin Rushton >>> het volgende geschreven: >>> >>> >>> >>> I'm guessing

Re: Triplets

On Sat, 2017-01-14 at 20:51 +, J Martin Rushton wrote: > > On 14/01/17 19:57, Richard Shann wrote: > > On Sat, 2017-01-14 at 18:14 +, J Martin Rushton wrote: > >> Hi, > >> I'm trying to set a melody from a 19thC source as closely as possible to > >>

Re: Triplets

On 14/01/17 21:27, Hans Aikema wrote: > > >> Op 14 jan. 2017 om 21:51 heeft J Martin Rushton >> het volgende geschreven: >> >> >> >> I'm guessing things aren't that simple, can I mix scheme and LP in the >> same input file? I don't have access to the code,

Re: Triplets

On 14/01/17 21:14, Noeck wrote: > Hi Martin, > > Am 14.01.2017 um 21:51 schrieb J Martin Rushton: >> I'm guessing things aren't that simple, can I mix scheme and LP in the >> same input file? > > Of course. You can put one after the other without problems and you can > nest them using #{ …ly…

Re: Triplets

> Op 14 jan. 2017 om 21:51 heeft J Martin Rushton > het volgende geschreven: > > > > I'm guessing things aren't that simple, can I mix scheme and LP in the > same input file? I don't have access to the code, this is embedded > within a larger application.

Re: Triplets

Hi Martin, Am 14.01.2017 um 21:51 schrieb J Martin Rushton: > I'm guessing things aren't that simple, can I mix scheme and LP in the > same input file? Of course. You can put one after the other without problems and you can nest them using #{ …ly… #} and #( …scheme… ). > I don't have access to

Re: Triplets

On 14/01/17 20:46, Noeck wrote: > tupletBracketToSlur = { > % Use slur-stencil > \override TupletBracket.stencil = #ly:slur::print > %% Use 'thickness from Slur > \override TupletBracket.thickness = #1.2 > %% 'control-points need to be set > \override TupletBracket.control-points = >

Re: Triplets

On 14/01/17 19:57, Richard Shann wrote: > On Sat, 2017-01-14 at 18:14 +, J Martin Rushton wrote: >> Hi, >> I'm trying to set a melody from a 19thC source as closely as possible to >> the original. Triplets are indicated with a curved bracket rather than >&g

Re: Triplets

Hi Martin, please note that you have to replace the double backslashes by a single one and mind the line breaks in the e-mail. Here is a version that works for me (2.19.50). Best, Joram tupletBracketToSlur = { % Use slur-stencil \override TupletBracket.stencil = #ly:slur::print %% Use

Re: Triplets

On Sat, 2017-01-14 at 18:14 +, J Martin Rushton wrote: > Hi, > I'm trying to set a melody from a 19thC source as closely as possible to > the original. Triplets are indicated with a curved bracket rather than > the square one Lily uses by default. I've come up with

Triplets

Hi, I'm trying to set a melody from a 19thC source as closely as possible to the original. Triplets are indicated with a curved bracket rather than the square one Lily uses by default. I've come up with a mechanism: \relative c'' { \tupletUp \override TupletBracket.bracket-visibility = ##f

Re: grace-note spacing and triplets

4' instead of '\once \omit Rest r16*3/2'. Thank you for these thoughts/snippet! Cheers Jan-Peter Am 23.03.2016 um 01:31 schrieb Thomas Morley: 2016-03-22 15:10 GMT+01:00 Jan-Peter Voigt <jp.vo...@gmx.de>: Hi all, I have a problem spacing grace notes under a series of triplets. In the ex

Re: grace-note spacing and triplets

Simon Albrecht: Hi Jan-Peter, On 22.03.2016 15:10, Jan-Peter Voigt wrote: Hi all, I have a problem spacing grace notes under a series of triplets. In the example, the grace notes produce a big gap between the tuplets or collide with the accidentals. It’s an annoying bug that this isn’t

Re: grace-note spacing and triplets

2016-03-22 15:10 GMT+01:00 Jan-Peter Voigt <jp.vo...@gmx.de>: > Hi all, > > I have a problem spacing grace notes under a series of triplets. In the > example, the grace notes produce a big gap between the tuplets or collide > with the accidentals. > > As this situatio

Re: grace-note spacing and triplets

Hi Jan-Peter, On 22.03.2016 15:10, Jan-Peter Voigt wrote: Hi all, I have a problem spacing grace notes under a series of triplets. In the example, the grace notes produce a big gap between the tuplets or collide with the accidentals. It’s an annoying bug that this isn’t handled nicely

grace-note spacing and triplets

Hi all, I have a problem spacing grace notes under a series of triplets. In the example, the grace notes produce a big gap between the tuplets or collide with the accidentals. As this situation is evident a few times, I will probably use extra-offset and place either the grace notes

Re: Subdivide beams in triplets

Nick McManus writes: > Hi all, > > I'm having some trouble achieving subdivided beams in this particular > example: > > \version "2.18.2" > > \relative c''{ > \set subdivideBeams = ##t > \set baseMoment = #(ly:make-moment 1 8) > \tuplet 9/4 {a16 bes a bes c bes c

Subdivide beams in triplets

Hi all, I'm having some trouble achieving subdivided beams in this particular example: \version "2.18.2" \relative c''{ \set subdivideBeams = ##t \set baseMoment = #(ly:make-moment 1 8) \tuplet 9/4 {a16 bes a bes c bes c d c} } I would like to achieve a set of 9 semiquavers (16th notes)

RE: Subdivide beams in triplets

Subject: Subdivide beams in triplets Hi all, I'm having some trouble achieving subdivided beams in this particular example: \version "2.18.2" \relative c''{ \set subdivideBeams = ##t \set baseMoment = #(ly:make-moment 1 8) \tuplet 9/4 {a16 bes a bes c bes c d c} } I would like

Re: Subdivide beams in triplets

-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org] On Behalf Of > Nick McManus > Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 9:53 PM > To: lilypond-user@gnu.org > Subject: Subdivide beams in triplets > > Hi all, > > I'm having some trouble achieving subdivided beams in this particular >

triplets across staves in piano scores

%% How can I put the last note of each triplet on the lower stave %% on the upper stave of the piano staff? \header{ title = "Triplets across staves" } upper = \relative c' { \clef treble \key c \major \time 2/4 c'2 } lower = \relative c' { \clef bass \key c \maj

Re: triplets across staves in piano scores

{ g8 c \change Staff = "upper" g' } \change Staff = > "lower" > Best, Abraham -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/triplets-across-staves-in-piano-scores-tp181182p181183.html Sent f

Re: superimposing different lengths and ties across triplets

Am 16.09.2015 um 12:43 schrieb Erich Neuwirth: %% I need a tie between the second note of the first triplet and the first note of the second triplet, \set tieWaitForNote = ##t or (if outside of the polyphonic construction) \set Staff.tieWaitForNote ##t should help. %% and I need the

superimposing different lengths and ties across triplets

ll would like something more. >> In the score I am using as stating point, >> the g’s at the first position of the triplets and the g’s of \voiceFour >> have a common notepad and the notes of the lowest voice >> are slightly shifted to the right. >> Can this be accomplished

Re: superimposing different lengths and ties across triplets

On 16.09.2015 12:43, Erich Neuwirth wrote: %% I need a tie between the second note of the first triplet and the first note of the second triplet, %% and I need the notehead of the d (upper note at first position) to be a half note. %% superimposing the half note and the triplet note gives the

Re: All triplets

2015-02-05 23:29 GMT+01:00 mirko mirko.guarn...@gmail.com: I have to write a score which is entirely in triplets. is there a way to avoid typing all the \times but just set a global rule so the eight note can be automatically considered as part of a triplet? Look for scaleDurations

Re: All triplets

Am 05.02.2015 um 23:44 schrieb Thomas Morley: 2015-02-05 23:29 GMT+01:00 mirko mirko.guarn...@gmail.com: I have to write a score which is entirely in triplets. is there a way to avoid typing all the \times but just set a global rule so the eight note can be automatically considered as part

All triplets

I have to write a score which is entirely in triplets. is there a way to avoid typing all the \times but just set a global rule so the eight note can be automatically considered as part of a triplet? ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org

Re: All triplets

2015-02-05 23:59 GMT+01:00 Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org: Am 05.02.2015 um 23:44 schrieb Thomas Morley: 2015-02-05 23:29 GMT+01:00 mirko mirko.guarn...@gmail.com: I have to write a score which is entirely in triplets. is there a way to avoid typing all the \times but just set a global rule

spacing of triplets

Hello, The attached file, InPlace.pdf, is a scan of three measures of a thirty seven measure movement. Notice the triplets in the lower staff. They are not evenly spaced. When I extract the code for these measures, extracted.ly, the triplets are more evenly spaced, extracted.pdf. Where

Re: spacing of triplets

Hello, as musician, I find more readable the ly-version. Cant say more Franck 2014-10-13 10:30 GMT-05:00, Mark Stephen Mrotek carsonm...@ca.rr.com: Hello, The attached file, InPlace.pdf, is a scan of three measures of a thirty seven measure movement. Notice the triplets in the lower staff

RE: spacing of triplets

Frank, Agreed, yet that is not how it appears when the entire movement is printed. Mark -Original Message- From: Alicuota618 [mailto:alicuota...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2014 9:18 AM To: Mark Stephen Mrotek Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Re: spacing of triplets Hello

Re: spacing of triplets

- From: Alicuota618 [mailto:alicuota...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2014 9:18 AM To: Mark Stephen Mrotek Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Re: spacing of triplets Hello, as musician, I find more readable the ly-version. Cant say more Franck 2014-10-13 10:30 GMT-05:00, Mark

RE: spacing of triplets

To: Mark Stephen Mrotek Cc: Alicuota618; LilyPond User Group Subject: Re: spacing of triplets There must be some other thing injected in a prior spot of your ly code for the entire movement that is causing that peculiar spacing to show up. I would start backtracking from the problem area and add

Re: spacing of triplets

On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Mark Stephen Mrotek When I extract the code for these measures, extracted.ly, the triplets are more evenly spaced, extracted.pdf. Where should I look for a remedy? Thank you for your kind attention. Mark Stephen Mrotek Mark

RE: spacing of triplets

Subject: Re: spacing of triplets On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Mark Stephen Mrotek When I extract the code for these measures, extracted.ly, the triplets are more evenly spaced, extracted.pdf. Where should I look for a remedy? Thank you for your kind attention. Mark

Different beaming for triplets

I've been asked a beaming rule question: Is it possible to specify a different beaming rule if a beat is divided into a triplet? In this example \version 2.16.0 \score { {\time 3/8 d''4 \times 2/3 { bes''16 a'' bes'' } fis''8 g''8 r ees'' \times 2/3 { d''16 c'' bes'

Re: Different beaming for triplets

Richard Shann rich...@rshann.plus.com writes: I've been asked a beaming rule question: Is it possible to specify a different beaming rule if a beat is divided into a triplet? In this example \version 2.16.0 \score { {\time 3/8 d''4 \times 2/3 { bes''16 a'' bes'' }

RE: Different beaming for triplets

Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2013 8:30 AM To: lilypond-user Subject: Different beaming for triplets I've been asked a beaming rule question: Is it possible to specify a different beaming rule if a beat is divided into a triplet? In this example \version 2.16.0 \score { {\time 3/8

Re: Different beaming for triplets

Thank you David (and to the others that replied), I had a go at getting my head round this before I asked, I find it a serious challenge. It would be nice to have a graphical way of selecting what you want visually and letting the computer do the hard work... Your new 2.19 syntax certainly looks

Re: Different beaming for triplets

On Wed, 2013-12-04 at 16:52 +, Phil Holmes wrote: - Original Message - From: Richard Shann rich...@rshann.plus.com To: lilypond-user lilypond-user@gnu.org Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2013 4:30 PM Subject: Different beaming for triplets I've been asked a beaming rule

Re: Different beaming for triplets

Richard Shann rich...@rshann.plus.com writes: Thank you David (and to the others that replied), I had a go at getting my head round this before I asked, I find it a serious challenge. Yes. It would be nice to have a graphical way of selecting what you want visually and letting the computer

Re: Different beaming for triplets

On Wed, 2013-12-04 at 19:05 +0100, David Kastrup wrote: Richard Shann rich...@rshann.plus.com writes: Thank you David (and to the others that replied), I had a go at getting my head round this before I asked, I find it a serious challenge. Yes. It would be nice to have a graphical

Re: Different beaming for triplets

Richard Shann rich...@rshann.plus.com writes: On Wed, 2013-12-04 at 19:05 +0100, David Kastrup wrote: Richard Shann rich...@rshann.plus.com writes: Thank you David (and to the others that replied), I had a go at getting my head round this before I asked, I find it a serious challenge.

Re: Spacing problems with triplets

Hi folks, 2013/6/20 Mike Solomon m...@mikesolomon.org: On 19 juin 2013, at 16:24, Tim McNamara tim...@bitstream.net wrote: Occasionally LilyPond will render triplets in an ungraceful manner: [...] This is not a problem in 2.17.21 with the following input : [...] I've seen the output like Tim

Re: Spacing problems with triplets

Am 21.06.2013 22:44, schrieb Janek Warchoł: Hi folks, 2013/6/20 Mike Solomon m...@mikesolomon.org: On 19 juin 2013, at 16:24, Tim McNamara tim...@bitstream.net wrote: Occasionally LilyPond will render triplets in an ungraceful manner: [...] This is not a problem in 2.17.21 with the following

Re: Spacing problems with triplets

2013/6/21 Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org: Am 21.06.2013 22:44, schrieb Janek Warchoł: Hi folks, 2013/6/20 Mike Solomon m...@mikesolomon.org: On 19 juin 2013, at 16:24, Tim McNamara tim...@bitstream.net wrote: Occasionally LilyPond will render triplets in an ungraceful manner

Re: Spacing problems with triplets

On 19 juin 2013, at 16:24, Tim McNamara tim...@bitstream.net wrote: Occasionally LilyPond will render triplets in an ungraceful manner: PastedGraphic-2.pdf And PastedGraphic-3.pdf All the quarter note triplets in the piece which are not under a volta bracket are rendered

Re: the question of triplets

On 27/04/13 05:02, David Kastrup wrote: Sarah k Alawamimarri...@gmail.com writes: Ok. I understand how triplets work. I've played them often enough lol! but in lily pond according to the manual it says it's written in a fraction. That's the part I don't get. I'm very horrible at math so

Re: the question of triplets

Hilary Snaden h...@newearth.demon.co.uk writes: After using LilyPond for seven years, I've got used to the \times x/y notation. How long will it remain available alongside \tuplet y/x? There are no plans to remove it. However, all of the documentation in 2.18 has been converted to use

Re: the question of triplets

On 27/04/13 14:41, David Kastrup wrote: Hilary Snadenh...@newearth.demon.co.uk writes: \tuplet has a nicer way to deal with tupletSpannerDuration, by the way. So you can continue using it if you want to, but in a few years, newcomers might no longer recognize what you are doing even though

Re: the question of triplets

Hilary Snaden h...@newearth.demon.co.uk writes: On 27/04/13 14:41, David Kastrup wrote: Hilary Snadenh...@newearth.demon.co.uk writes: \tuplet has a nicer way to deal with tupletSpannerDuration, by the way. So you can continue using it if you want to, but in a few years, newcomers might no

the question of triplets

Ok. I understand how triplets work. I've played them often enough lol! but in lily pond according to the manual it says it's written in a fraction. That's the part I don't get. I'm very horrible at math so is there a way to comprehend these triplets. I think they are eighth notes if I hear

Re: the question of triplets

On Apr 26, 2013, at 6:56 PM, Sarah k Alawami wrote: Ok. I understand how triplets work. I've played them often enough lol! but in lily pond according to the manual it says it's written in a fraction. That's the part I don't get. I'm very horrible at math so is there a way to comprehend

Re: the question of triplets

Sarah k Alawami marri...@gmail.com writes: Ok. I understand how triplets work. I've played them often enough lol! but in lily pond according to the manual it says it's written in a fraction. That's the part I don't get. I'm very horrible at math so is there a way to comprehend these triplets

Aligning triplets evenly

Lilypond promises to generate nicely scores. (http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.16/Documentation/essay/engraving-details#optical-spacing) This works in most cases. But I have currently a score that shows ugly triplets. It should spread the note heads evenly aligned in the X-axis. The excerpt below

Re: Aligning triplets evenly

On 26 December 2012 10:07, Helge Kruse helge.kr...@gmx.net wrote: Lilypond promises to generate nicely scores. (http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.16/Documentation/essay/engraving-details#optical-spacing) This works in most cases. But I have currently a score that shows ugly triplets. It should

Drums : align triplets to eights in other voice

Hi all, Version : 2.12.3 on OSX via MacPorts Given \version 2.12.3 swing = \drummode { cymr4 cymr8 cymr8 cymr4 cymr8 cymr8 } down = \drummode { \times 2/3 { bd8 sn sn } \times 2/3 { bd hhp sn sn } \times 2/3 { bd sn sn } \times 2/3 { bd hhp sn sn } } \score { \new DrumStaff {

  1   2   >