What do you think about talking out the score in lilypond style..so you
wouldnt have to switch eyes between screen and sheet..for example..:
c 8 f 16 c 4 . ( d 8 d d |
and than a script to fix it:
c8 f16 c4. ( d8 d d |
but i think that voice recognition is not well suported on linux..i think
On 26 May 2012 03:28, Klaus Föhl klaus.fo...@uni-giessen.de wrote:
Hello,
I like the lilypond notation using \relative being concise and readable.
Entering on a computer keyboard is fairly quick, but still it feels
that playing a melody line would be so much quicker. In particular
if one
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Klaus Föhl klaus.fo...@uni-giessen.dewrote:
Hello,
I like the lilypond notation using \relative being concise and readable.
Entering on a computer keyboard is fairly quick, but still it feels
that playing a melody line would be so much quicker. In particular
Andrew Hawryluk ahawry...@gmail.com writes:
Maybe someday the computer will be able to see or hear the music in my
head and type it out ... no, scratch that. Mind-reading computers
doesn't sounds like a good idea at all: we're trying to keep the
humans in charge of this place, after all!
I
Am 26.05.2012 18:46, schrieb David Kastrup:
Andrew Hawrylukahawry...@gmail.com writes:
Maybe someday the computer will be able to see or hear the music in my
head and type it out ... no, scratch that. Mind-reading computers
doesn't sounds like a good idea at all: we're trying to keep the
midi2ly, obviously. It sucks royally for human-created input. Look up
Viterbi decoders and/or hidden Markov chains for a plan how to do better.
So far I have mentally broken down the task into two main chunks:
1) establish the maths function/relation recording time versus music piece time
2)
Klaus Föhl klaus.fo...@uni-giessen.de writes:
midi2ly, obviously. It sucks royally for human-created input. Look up
Viterbi decoders and/or hidden Markov chains for a plan how to do better.
So far I have mentally broken down the task into two main chunks:
1) establish the maths
On Fri, 25 May 2012 17:28:02 + (UTC)
Klaus Föhl klaus.fo...@uni-giessen.de wrote:
Hello,
I like the lilypond notation using \relative being concise and readable.
Entering on a computer keyboard is fairly quick, but still it feels
that playing a melody line would be so much quicker. In
Hello,
I like the lilypond notation using \relative being concise and readable.
Entering on a computer keyboard is fairly quick, but still it feels
that playing a melody line would be so much quicker. In particular
if one does not have a typing c4 d e f g1 style but c4 d4. e8 f8. g16 c,1
What
Klaus Föhl klaus.fo...@uni-giessen.de writes:
Hello,
I like the lilypond notation using \relative being concise and readable.
Entering on a computer keyboard is fairly quick, but still it feels
that playing a melody line would be so much quicker. In particular
if one does not have a typing
From: Klaus Föhl
I like the lilypond notation using \relative being concise and readable.
Entering on a computer keyboard is fairly quick, but still it feels
that playing a melody line would be so much quicker. In particular
if one does not have a typing c4 d e f g1 style but c4 d4. e8 f8.
11 matches
Mail list logo
