Dynamics with expressive text, like "p espressivo" are meant to have the
dynamic aligned on the notehead the same as ordinary dynamics, with the
expressive text following. Here is a snippet I've written to align custom
dynamics correctly.
\version "2.18.2"
\paper {
ragged-right = ##f
indent
Agreed about the optical spacing. My goal was to get the alignment to be
identical between the bare dynamics and the dynamics + text. To my eye, the
fff and fff espressivo are aligned the same, so it seems more like something
that could be improved in Lilypond's dynamic alignment in general.
I
Hi Shevek,
> Here is a snippet I've written to align custom dynamics correctly.
This is a nice start — thanks!
Two thoughts:
1. To my eye, the f's don't seem centred (the fff shows the "error" more
prominently than the f". I realise this is an optical illusion based on the
actual
Hi,
I just re-read the code and comments, and it seems configuring lilyquick
works a little different. It looks to me that this is done from the
function InitSetNoteLengths(). I'd rather enter my own list of
valuemappings in a simple table. I only have to do that once, and
LilyQuick
On Fri, 7 Jul 2017 11:23:49 +1000, Vaughan McAlley
wrote:
> I’ve put version 0.941beta up which fixes the issue of custom layouts not
> working and adds a Denemo layout option.
Thanks.
One thing: When I run lq, I still have to (manually) connnect its 'Virtual
RawMIDI '
On Fri, 7 Jul 2017, Vaughan McAlley wrote:
I developed the layout myself using the Finale Speedy Note Entry as a base,
which was:
8 - \breve
7 - 1
6 - 2
5 - 4
4 - 8
3 - 16
2 - 32
1 - 64
This also corresponds with the keyboard shortcuts for note durations when
entering notes in MuseScore.