Re: Triplets

2017-01-15 0:21 GMT+01:00 Thomas Morley : > With my lily-2.14.2 I can do in terminal: > > ~$ lilypond-2-14-2 -e '(scm-style-repl)' > GNU LilyPond 2.14.2 > guile> UP > 1 > guile> DOWN > -1 > guile> ly:tuplet-bracket::calc-direction > # > guile> > > All there and

Re: Triplets

Hi, some relevant changes between 2.14 and 2.19 are these: http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/changes/index.html > error: syntax error, unexpected '=', expecting SCM_FUNCTION or SCM_IDENTIFIER > or SCM_TOKEN > \override TupletBracket.stencil > =

Re: Triplets

> On 14 Jan 2017, at 23:42, Simon Albrecht wrote: > > On 14.01.2017 23:34, Hans Aikema wrote: >>> Can you try replacing >>> UP in that line by 1 >>> and DOWN in that line by -1 >>> apparently the version of Lilypond in use does not yet have these constants >>> defined

Re: Triplets

2017-01-14 23:41 GMT+01:00 J Martin Rushton : > > > On 14/01/17 22:34, Hans Aikema wrote: >> >>> On 14 Jan 2017, at 23:32, Hans Aikema wrote: >>> >>> On 14 Jan 2017, at 23:14, J Martin Rushton

Re: Triplets

On 14.01.2017 23:34, Hans Aikema wrote: Can you try replacing UP in that line by 1 and DOWN in that line by -1 apparently the version of Lilypond in use does not yet have these constants defined (values taken from

Re: Triplets

On 14/01/17 22:34, Hans Aikema wrote: > >> On 14 Jan 2017, at 23:32, Hans Aikema wrote: >> >> >>> On 14 Jan 2017, at 23:14, J Martin Rushton >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Progress. That seems to have sorted out the syntax errors but

Re: Triplets

> On 14 Jan 2017, at 23:32, Hans Aikema wrote: > > >> On 14 Jan 2017, at 23:14, J Martin Rushton >> wrote: >> >> >>> >> Progress. That seems to have sorted out the syntax errors but there's >> an issue with one variable: >>

Re: Triplets

> On 14 Jan 2017, at 23:14, J Martin Rushton > wrote: > > >> > Progress. That seems to have sorted out the syntax errors but there's > an issue with one variable: > ---%<-- > Processing `.../file.ly' > Parsing... >

Re: Triplets

On 14/01/17 22:07, Hans Aikema wrote: > >> On 14 Jan 2017, at 22:49, Richard Shann wrote: >> >> On Sat, 2017-01-14 at 21:48 +, J Martin Rushton wrote: >>> >>> On 14/01/17 21:29, Richard Shann wrote: >>> >> >>> I suspect the outer processing or else the low version

Re: Triplets

On 14/01/17 21:49, Richard Shann wrote: > On Sat, 2017-01-14 at 21:48 +, J Martin Rushton wrote: >> >> On 14/01/17 21:29, Richard Shann wrote: >> > >> I suspect the outer processing or else the low version are going to >> waste a lot of time, so I've gone back to using square type

Re: Triplets

> On 14 Jan 2017, at 22:49, Richard Shann wrote: > > On Sat, 2017-01-14 at 21:48 +, J Martin Rushton wrote: >> >> On 14/01/17 21:29, Richard Shann wrote: >> > >> I suspect the outer processing or else the low version are going to >> waste a lot of time, so I've

Re: Triplets

On Sat, 2017-01-14 at 21:48 +, J Martin Rushton wrote: > > On 14/01/17 21:29, Richard Shann wrote: > > I suspect the outer processing or else the low version are going to > waste a lot of time, so I've gone back to using square type brackets, > the slur type were not clear. yes, the first

Re: Triplets

On 14/01/17 21:41, Hans Aikema wrote: > >> On 14 Jan 2017, at 22:33, J Martin Rushton >> wrote: >> >> >> >> On 14/01/17 21:27, Hans Aikema wrote: >>> >>> Op 14 jan. 2017 om 21:51 heeft J Martin Rushton het volgende

Re: Triplets

On 14/01/17 21:29, Richard Shann wrote: > > Here's a complete working example: > 8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8>< > > %% LilyPond file generated by Denemo version 2.0.17 > > %%http://www.gnu.org/software/denemo/ > > \version "2.18.0" > > >

Re: Triplets

> On 14 Jan 2017, at 22:33, J Martin Rushton > wrote: > > > > On 14/01/17 21:27, Hans Aikema wrote: >> >> >>> Op 14 jan. 2017 om 21:51 heeft J Martin Rushton >>> het volgende geschreven: >>> >>> >>> >>> I'm guessing

Re: Triplets

On Sat, 2017-01-14 at 20:51 +, J Martin Rushton wrote: > > On 14/01/17 19:57, Richard Shann wrote: > > On Sat, 2017-01-14 at 18:14 +, J Martin Rushton wrote: > >> Hi, > >> I'm trying to set a melody from a 19thC source as closely as possible to > >> the original. Triplets are indicated

Re: Triplets

On 14/01/17 21:27, Hans Aikema wrote: > > >> Op 14 jan. 2017 om 21:51 heeft J Martin Rushton >> het volgende geschreven: >> >> >> >> I'm guessing things aren't that simple, can I mix scheme and LP in the >> same input file? I don't have access to the code,

Re: Triplets

On 14/01/17 21:14, Noeck wrote: > Hi Martin, > > Am 14.01.2017 um 21:51 schrieb J Martin Rushton: >> I'm guessing things aren't that simple, can I mix scheme and LP in the >> same input file? > > Of course. You can put one after the other without problems and you can > nest them using #{ …ly…

Re: Triplets

> Op 14 jan. 2017 om 21:51 heeft J Martin Rushton > het volgende geschreven: > > > > I'm guessing things aren't that simple, can I mix scheme and LP in the > same input file? I don't have access to the code, this is embedded > within a larger application.

Re: Triplets

Hi Martin, Am 14.01.2017 um 21:51 schrieb J Martin Rushton: > I'm guessing things aren't that simple, can I mix scheme and LP in the > same input file? Of course. You can put one after the other without problems and you can nest them using #{ …ly… #} and #( …scheme… ). > I don't have access to

Re: Triplets

On 14/01/17 20:46, Noeck wrote: > tupletBracketToSlur = { > % Use slur-stencil > \override TupletBracket.stencil = #ly:slur::print > %% Use 'thickness from Slur > \override TupletBracket.thickness = #1.2 > %% 'control-points need to be set > \override TupletBracket.control-points = >

Re: Triplets

On 14/01/17 19:57, Richard Shann wrote: > On Sat, 2017-01-14 at 18:14 +, J Martin Rushton wrote: >> Hi, >> I'm trying to set a melody from a 19thC source as closely as possible to >> the original. Triplets are indicated with a curved bracket rather than >> the square one Lily uses by

Re: Triplets

Hi Martin, please note that you have to replace the double backslashes by a single one and mind the line breaks in the e-mail. Here is a version that works for me (2.19.50). Best, Joram tupletBracketToSlur = { % Use slur-stencil \override TupletBracket.stencil = #ly:slur::print %% Use

Re: Triplets

On Sat, 2017-01-14 at 18:14 +, J Martin Rushton wrote: > Hi, > I'm trying to set a melody from a 19thC source as closely as possible to > the original. Triplets are indicated with a curved bracket rather than > the square one Lily uses by default. I've come up with a mechanism: > >

Re: triplets across staves in piano scores

Erich, On Wednesday, September 16, 2015, Erich Neuwirth [via Lilypond] < ml-node+s1069038n181182...@n5.nabble.com> wrote: > %% How can I put the last note of each triplet on the lower stave > %% on the upper stave of the piano staff? > > Like this: > \tuplet 3/2 { g8 c \change Staff =

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: Triplets and Diddles]

- Forwarded message from Cameron Horsburgh [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Oops, forgot to forward this to the list! From: Cameron Horsburgh [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: X X [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Cameron Horsburgh [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivery-date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 08:25:33 +1100 Subject: Re: Triplets

Re: Triplets and Diddles

On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 07:28:02PM -0800, X X wrote: Thanks, I kind of get this now, so far I've only written out one of our Cadences out, and it's only a line or so long. So, I have some work cut out for me. Oh, also I keep getting an error with this code: \header{ title =

Re: triplets

I forward a generalized version of your question to the developers: Does anyone object if I submit a patch for the default auto beam settings corresponding to #(override-auto-beam-setting '(end * * 3 4) 1 4) #(override-auto-beam-setting '(end * * 3 4) 2 4) i.e. that all beams end on every beat

Re: triplets

Why isn't this the default? Would it be possible to add those rules to auto-beam.scm? Frédéric Mats Bengtsson wrote: A better solution is to tell LilyPond to automatically beam the triplets this way, see 8.6.2 Setting automatic beam behavior for more details. For Jutta's example, just add

Re: triplets

I believe that What you're looking for is \compressMusic. Apparently, it works just like \times, but doesn't show the tuplet brackets. I haven't used it, so I don't know. It also might be new to 2.7, since I can't seem to find any mention of it in the manual (2.6 or 2.7). I did find some

Re: triplets

On 6-Dec-05, at 11:21 PM, jutta wrote: Now, the figure 3 above each triplet is too close to the beam. How can I increase the space? (1 mm) I would like to have the 3´s above the beams only in the first measure. For the rest of the score I would like to switch them off. What can I do?

Re: triplets

Take a look at the example called tuplet-properties.ly in the Regression Tests document to see how to turn off triplet brackets and do other fine tuning. /Mats Graham Percival wrote: On 5-Dec-05, at 5:50 AM, Homrighausen wrote: Hi Graham, one more question: the triplets in the attachment

Re: triplets

On 12/6/05, jutta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I need some help with triplets. I want to have 3 triplets in one measure. Each triplet consists of bbg (example below). So each triplet should be beamed individually. But: what happens is that all 3 triplets are connected by one lang beam. What

Re: triplets

A better solution is to tell LilyPond to automatically beam the triplets this way, see 8.6.2 Setting automatic beam behavior for more details. For Jutta's example, just add #(override-auto-beam-setting '(end 1 12 3 4) 1 4) #(override-auto-beam-setting '(end 1 12 3 4) 2 4) before the triplets

Re: triplets

On 5-Dec-05, at 5:50 AM, Homrighausen wrote: Hi Graham, one more question: the triplets in the attachment should not be connected. What can I do? Please keep lilypond emails on the mailing list. That way other people can help or get help from the answers. By connected, do you mean

Re: Triplets at the other direction

On 18-Dec-04, at 8:22 AM, Mats Bengtsson wrote: Joshua Koo wrote: Hi, When I have triplet, the 3 is in the same direction of the stems (eg. 3 is at the bottom if stem are down) . However I like it at the side of the note head, which means the opposite direction the stem are facing. (eg. I would

Re: Triplets at the other direction

As far as I know, this is not supported for the moment, but it might be a nice feature to have an additional possible value for the direction property of any object, which means do the opposite of the default value (the latter part of the answer is intended for the developers). /Mats Joshua