Re: Switching the direction of slurs in tupletBracketToSlur (from Re: Unknown marking in Roman print (1710))

On Mon, 2016-05-23 at 23:02 +0200, Thomas Morley wrote: > 2016-05-23 16:27 GMT+02:00 Richard Shann : > > On Mon, 2016-05-23 at 10:13 +0200, Simon Albrecht wrote: > >> On 22.05.2016 23:29, Richard Shann wrote: > >> > I wonder did my email "Switching > >> > the direction of

Re: Switching the direction of slurs in tupletBracketToSlur (from Re: Unknown marking in Roman print (1710))

2016-05-23 16:27 GMT+02:00 Richard Shann : > On Mon, 2016-05-23 at 10:13 +0200, Simon Albrecht wrote: >> On 22.05.2016 23:29, Richard Shann wrote: >> > I wonder did my email "Switching >> > the direction of slurs in tupletBracketToSlur" get overlooked or is >> > there no

Re: Switching the direction of slurs in tupletBracketToSlur (from Re: Unknown marking in Roman print (1710))

On Mon, 2016-05-23 at 10:13 +0200, Simon Albrecht wrote: > On 22.05.2016 23:29, Richard Shann wrote: > > I wonder did my email "Switching > > the direction of slurs in tupletBracketToSlur" get overlooked or is > > there no way that a direction can be set to be the opposite to the stems > > and

Re: Unknown marking in Roman print (1710)

On 22.05.2016 23:29, Richard Shann wrote: I wonder did my email "Switching the direction of slurs in tupletBracketToSlur" get overlooked or is there no way that a direction can be set to be the opposite to the stems and beams direction? Certainly it hasn’t been overlooked, and there is a way

Re: Unknown marking in Roman print (1710)

On Sun, 2016-05-22 at 12:46 +0100, Richard Shann wrote: > On Sun, 2016-05-22 at 13:26 +0200, Simon Albrecht wrote: > > On 22.05.2016 13:01, Andrew Bernard wrote: > > > Hi Richard, > > > > > > When attempting to view your score on IMSLP, I get an error page as > > > follows: > > > > > > You have

Re: Unknown marking in Roman print (1710)

On Sun, 2016-05-22 at 13:26 +0200, Simon Albrecht wrote: > On 22.05.2016 13:01, Andrew Bernard wrote: > > Hi Richard, > > > > When attempting to view your score on IMSLP, I get an error page as follows: > > > > You have reached this page because the file you requested has not been > > reviewed

Re: Unknown marking in Roman print (1710)

On 22.05.2016 13:01, Andrew Bernard wrote: Hi Richard, When attempting to view your score on IMSLP, I get an error page as follows: You have reached this page because the file you requested has not been reviewed for copyright, or is currently restricted due to various reasons. The block will

Re: Unknown marking in Roman print (1710)

Hi Richard, When attempting to view your score on IMSLP, I get an error page as follows: You have reached this page because the file you requested has not been reviewed for copyright, or is currently restricted due to various reasons. The block will be lifted after the file is reviewed for

Re: Unknown marking in Roman print (1710)

On Sun, 2016-05-22 at 18:01 +1000, Andrew Bernard wrote: > Hi Richard, > > Studying this in the full context of the scanned original, it’s clear to me > these are ‘t.’ glyphs, and the edges of the type form have smudged from time > to time. I notice there are some ‘.t’ forms – probably printing

Re: Unknown marking in Roman print (1710)

On 22.05.2016 10:18, Rutger Hofman wrote: Please be careful about distributing such information about IMSLP. It is incorrect. IMSLP still allows anyone to download any score for free and without registration, but you have to wait a short time, I think 10 seconds, 15, actually. before

Re: Unknown marking in Roman print (1710)

Please be careful about distributing such information about IMSLP. It is incorrect. IMSLP still allows anyone to download any score for free and without registration, but you have to wait a short time, I think 10 seconds, before downloading. If you are a subscriber, you don't have the wait

Re: Unknown marking in Roman print (1710)

Hi Richard, Studying this in the full context of the scanned original, it’s clear to me these are ‘t.’ glyphs, and the edges of the type form have smudged from time to time. I notice there are some ‘.t’ forms – probably printing errors. Even though an old print, it’s pretty miserable music

Re: Unknown marking in Roman print (1710)

On Sun, 2016-05-22 at 17:51 +1000, Andrew Bernard wrote: > HI Richard, > > On 22/05/2016, 5:41 PM, "Richard Shann" wrote: > > >I gave a link to a scan of the original print, > > You can’t view it unless you are a subscriber to IMSLP. I heard they had introduced some

Re: Unknown marking in Roman print (1710)

HI Richard, On 22/05/2016, 5:41 PM, "Richard Shann" wrote: >I gave a link to a scan of the original print, You can’t view it unless you are a subscriber to IMSLP. Andrew ___ lilypond-user mailing list

Re: Unknown marking in Roman print (1710)

On Sun, 2016-05-22 at 11:42 +1000, Andrew Bernard wrote: > Can you give a bit more context? What instrument? I gave a link to a scan of the original print, but here is a link to the page where there is a choice of 80Mb or 4.5Mb scans of the print.

Re: Unknown marking in Roman print (1710)

Can you give a bit more context? What instrument? Can we see the signs at the bottom of the image? Who is the composer? The work? More clues would help. Andrew On 22/05/2016, 12:01 AM, "lilypond-user on behalf of Richard Shann" wrote: >Attached is a bit of an early 18th print (*) using

Re: Unknown marking in Roman print (1710)

On my phone, it looks like a blobby lower-case t, which makes sense in context. On 21 May 2016 15:06, "Richard Shann" wrote: > Attached is a bit of an early 18th print (*) using movable type - does > anyone on the list know what the sign that looks like an E is? > >