Re: question about overrides within repeats

Werner LEMBERG writes: >> Well, System::post_processing ends by creating the stencils of a >> system in reverse order. That's probably not helping. > > A bug? No, there is no guaranteed order of stencilization. But making stuff more random gratuitously is still going to annoy

Re: question about overrides within repeats

On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 2:44 PM, David Kastrup wrote: > Thomas Morley writes: > > > Though, why it is that arbitrary? > > > > Look at this variation and the attached image: > > > > \version "2.19.29" > > #(define test-nmbrs > > (let ((nmbrs

Re: question about overrides within repeats

David Nalesnik writes: > My question would be: when does the evaluation of a grob's stencil > normally happen? My guess is this normal evaluation is happening > based on a haphazard input, that using 'before-line-breaking and > 'after-line-breaking is forcing a later

Re: question about overrides within repeats

On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 4:56 PM, David Kastrup wrote: > David Nalesnik writes: > > > The following function gives each TextScript grobs on a line a number > based > > on its position within the 'all-elements array. Each line should be > > numbered 1-20

Re: question about overrides within repeats

David Nalesnik writes: > The following function gives each TextScript grobs on a line a number based > on its position within the 'all-elements array. Each line should be > numbered 1-20 in order, but that's clearly not the case. There's a binding > of texts which

Re: question about overrides within repeats

> Well, System::post_processing ends by creating the stencils of a > system in reverse order. That's probably not helping. A bug? Werner ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: question about overrides within repeats

Hi, On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 3:00 PM, David Kastrup wrote: > Simon Albrecht writes: > > > On 22.11.2015 21:44, David Kastrup wrote: > >> Thomas Morley writes: > >> > >>> Though, why it is that arbitrary? > >>> > >>> Look at this

Re: question about overrides within repeats

On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 2:18 PM, David Nalesnik wrote: > > > On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 2:15 PM, Thomas Morley > wrote: > >> 2015-11-22 20:49 GMT+01:00 David Nalesnik : >> > >> > >> > On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 1:21 PM,

Re: question about overrides within repeats

On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 1:21 PM, David Kastrup wrote: > > > Is there any way to get the override to be reevaluated with each repeat? > > No. Written in that manner, the override is evaluated at _input_ time. > If you put it in a variable and use that variable 3 times, the colors >

Re: question about overrides within repeats

2015-11-22 20:49 GMT+01:00 David Nalesnik : > > > On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 1:21 PM, David Kastrup wrote: >> >> >> > Is there any way to get the override to be reevaluated with each repeat? >> >> No. Written in that manner, the override is evaluated at

Re: question about overrides within repeats

On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 2:15 PM, Thomas Morley wrote: > 2015-11-22 20:49 GMT+01:00 David Nalesnik : > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 1:21 PM, David Kastrup wrote: > >> > >> > >> > Is there any way to get the override to be

question about overrides within repeats

Hi, Given the following function, each time an override of NoteHead.color occurs, a new color from the list is used: \version "2.19.30" #(define test (let ((colors (circular-list red green blue yellow darkgreen magenta))) (lambda () (let ((color (car colors))) (set!

Re: question about overrides within repeats

David Nalesnik writes: > Hi, > > Given the following function, each time an override of NoteHead.color > occurs, a new color from the list is used: > > \version "2.19.30" > > #(define test >(let ((colors (circular-list red green blue yellow darkgreen magenta))) >

Re: question about overrides within repeats

Thomas Morley writes: > Though, why it is that arbitrary? > > Look at this variation and the attached image: > > \version "2.19.29" > #(define test-nmbrs > (let ((nmbrs (circular-list 1 2 3 4))) > (lambda (grob) > (let ((n (car nmbrs))) > (set! nmbrs

Re: question about overrides within repeats

On 22.11.2015 21:44, David Kastrup wrote: Thomas Morley writes: Though, why it is that arbitrary? Look at this variation and the attached image: \version "2.19.29" #(define test-nmbrs (let ((nmbrs (circular-list 1 2 3 4))) (lambda (grob) (let ((n

Re: question about overrides within repeats

Simon Albrecht writes: > On 22.11.2015 21:44, David Kastrup wrote: >> Thomas Morley writes: >> >>> Though, why it is that arbitrary? >>> >>> Look at this variation and the attached image: >>> >>> \version "2.19.29" >>> #(define test-nmbrs >>>