On 20 January 2011 05:15, Scott Bambrough scott.bambro...@linaro.orgwrote:
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 15:02 -0600, James Westby wrote:
An illustration of what I mean: if we add linux_image and ignore it, and
then use it within Android hwpacks, someone with the old code will try
and use one of
Andy,
thanks, and I've just added wiki.linaro.org/Boards as a top level index
and a page that I've been using for the Efika mx smartbook...
Dave
On 20 Jan 2011, at 06:50, Andy Doan wrote:
FYI:
I've just created a page describing how to get a Linaro image running on
the Overo
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011, Alexander Sack wrote:
What's the plan for staging/QA before pushing this backport into the
tools ppa?
Good question; do we have a process for this? I realize we don't have
a -proposed/-updates etc. setup for stuff which we only provide in
PPAs.
--
Loïc Minier
Hey
As a followup to IRC conversations around backports, releases and QA
today, I'd like to hear what others think of our Linaro PPAs. I'll
start with some history and proposals:
We created a fairly ad hoc PPA layout for the 10.11 cycle, with
ppa:linaro-maintainers/tools
On 20 January 2011 18:30, Loïc Minier loic.min...@linaro.org wrote:
Hey
As a followup to IRC conversations around backports, releases and QA
today, I'd like to hear what others think of our Linaro PPAs. I'll
start with some history and proposals:
To my mind the important
Hi Jorg,
The availability of graphics drivers is obviously quite a hot topic at the
moment. For your OMAP3 board, you are probably better off sticking with the
ubuntu packages (you'll need to add multiverse in order to find the various
'*-sgx-omap3' packages) as that will get you up and running
Followed this quickly today.
My build line was different due to the way the branch executed:
joey@warthog:~$ overo-kernel-suffix/linaro-hwpack-create --local-deb
./u-boot-linaro-omap3-overo_2010.12-0ubuntu1_armel.deb --local-deb
./x-loader-omap3-overo_1.4.4+git20101223+6f3a261-1ubuntu1_armel.deb
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 7:44 AM, David Gilbert david.gilb...@linaro.org wrote:
On 20 January 2011 18:30, Loïc Minier loic.min...@linaro.org wrote:
Hey
As a followup to IRC conversations around backports, releases and QA
today, I'd like to hear what others think of our Linaro PPAs.
Thanks Joey. We had a late breaking bug yesterday that made me switch
branches in the document. The fix has now been merged and the Wiki has
been updated to point you to the correctLinaro Image Tools:
bzr branch lp:linaro-image-tools
On 01/20/2011 01:10 PM, Joey Stanford wrote:
Followed this
Hello Jesse (et al)
Thanks for your answer, some confusion remains, see below.
I'm fine with proprietary drivers, this just has to work.
The availability of graphics drivers is obviously quite a hot topic at the
moment.
For your OMAP3 board, you are probably better off sticking with the
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 4:44 PM, Joerg Hohensohn
joerg.hohens...@dreamchip.de wrote:
Hello Jesse (et al)
Thanks for your answer, some confusion remains, see below.
I'm fine with proprietary drivers, this just has to work.
The availability of graphics drivers is obviously quite a hot topic at
11 matches
Mail list logo