On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 03:33:24PM +0800, Jason Hui wrote:
Hi, Shawn,
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Shawn Guo shawn@freescale.com wrote:
Hi Jason,
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 12:59:42PM +0800, Jason Liu wrote:
Signed-off-by: Jason Liu jason@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Jason Liu
+++ Dave Martin [2011-03-11 11:20 +]:
Although it's not directly related to nano (which is useful in itself
as a miminal usable system) it could make sense to be able to generate
images with no built-in packager support - i.e., the packer must
effectively be run offline to generate the
Hi,
Installed image is 125 Megs. (Down from 290 Meg) We're on the cusp
of being able to fit into 128 megs of flash.
If that's seen to be interesting, we should probably discuss it with
the emdebian folks-- there's a risk of reinventing what they do; plus
they certainly have tools which
On Friday 11 March 2011, Jason Hui wrote:
Alternatively, it could be done the other way round: rename the identifiers
in the file from mx51_ to mx5_, and make sure that they don't contain
any mx51 specific settings but always refer to properties in the
device tree for the differences.
Fix for LP #731780.
---
tasks/mktarball.sh | 60
tasks/tarballs.mk |4 ++-
2 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
create mode 100755 tasks/mktarball.sh
diff --git a/tasks/mktarball.sh b/tasks/mktarball.sh
new file mode
Hello All
I'm about to start work on getting kprobes working with thumb2.
One of the issues I have is that when probes are placed onto
conditionally executed instructions in a IT block, they may not fire if
the condition is not met. This is because on ARM we use invalid
instructions for
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 01:01:46PM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011, Dave Martin wrote:
As I understand it, debootstrap or germinate basically do the right
thing. All we would need would be to document the use of the existing
tools, and provide suitable ultra-minimal seeds
On 8 March 2011 02:37, Jim Huang jim.hu...@linaro.org wrote:
I just updated wiki page about Google's compiler benchmark suite:
https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/Android/UpstreamToolchain
Please check the section, Evaluate Benchmark suite.
Through adb[1], it is highly convenient to bench
Hi,
The minutes from the Engineering Resources team meeting can be found
here:
https://wiki.linaro.org/Mentoring/Status/WeeklyMeeting/2011-03-11
Summary below.
--Matt
=== Action Items from This Meeting ===
* AddNewHardware/HardwarePack pages need to explain kernel packages
as Steve noted
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 8:15 PM, Tom Gall tom.g...@linaro.org wrote:
I don't know why we're installed the firmware deb, does any of the
hardware we're supporting even use that?
fwiw... TI wlan chipset firmware (wl127x) is in this package. so on
pandaboard with current mainline + linux-firmware
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 11:44:48AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 10:48:10AM -0700, Grant Likely wrote:
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Shawn Guo shawn@linaro.org wrote:
The patch is to add all gpt, uart related dt clock nodes for babbage.
It sticks to the clock name
Hello all,
I'm looking at function of_device_alloc in drivers/of/platform.c, and
surprisingly found that the platform device instance id is being
hard-coded as -1 when calling platform_device_alloc. Does this mean
that there is no support of pdev id in DT? If yes, can anyone please
help me
12 matches
Mail list logo
