The patych below removes an #ifdef for kernel 2.2 from
include/asm-s390/debug.h .
Hmm, this one somehow slipped my notice. It is the last occurence
of KERNEL_VERSION in the s390 code for 2.6. I've applied the patch
to our CVS and I will send it with the next update to Andrew.
Thanks for
Hmm, this one somehow slipped my notice.
Did you get the one where Samba-3 source will not build due to a missing
lockout around the statfs structure in usr/include/asm-s390/statfs.h?
-Mike MacIsaac, IBM mikemac at us.ibm.com (845) 433-7061
Microsystems Inc.and
Fujitsu Siemens that run versions of the popular Unix operating system
that Linux is based upon, IBM spokeswoman Sandra Dressel said.
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=storycid=569ncid=738e=9u=/nm/20040210/tc_nm/tech_ibm_germany_dc
--
Dave Jones
Hello,
I also received a email from a Fake eBay site last week on 02/04/2004. Mine
was slightly different. It had a URL in it that went off to a non-English
site.
It took me a couple of hours, but I was able to find the reporting site to
eBay for these kinds of Fake emails ( Spoofs as eBay
Hi,
I would like to config a certificate authority (CA) in my company
with RACF. Is it possible??? If it is possible, how can I do it??
Redbooks ???
thanks in advanced,
--
Antonio Pires
Suporte Tecnico - AGANP
Antonio,
These links have some useful info on RACF's capabilities regarding Certs.
www-1.ibm.com/servers/eserver/zseries/zos/
racf/pdf/r02_digital_cert_part_1.pdf
www-1.ibm.com/servers/eserver/zseries/zos/
racf/pdf/r02_digital_cert_part_2.pdf
Sandy
To a degree, but for distributed computing we have almost everything so we
already meet that requirement.
Thanks!
Eric Sammons
David Boyes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: Linux on 390 Port [EMAIL PROTECTED]
02/09/2004 08:54 PM
Please respond to Linux on 390 Port
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I see to get a Red Hat supported version for S/390 it is $15,000 US or
$18,000 US. Anyone have an idea how much for the SuSE supported version?
Thanks
Craig
It varies according to the number of CPUs being used by Linux/390, and by
the architecture. G5/G5 being the cheapest, z900/z990 the most expensive.
The latest prices I have are fairly old, and in Euros. :P What machine do
you have, and how many processors will be assigned?
Mark Post
We have a 9672-R76 (G5) and currently all seven processors are s/390, no
IFL. We limit the Linux LPAR to one engine.
Craig
-Original Message-
From: Post, Mark K [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 12:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: How
Depends on your processor, what service level you want, and what you negotiate. Can
be up to $11,000 per CPU. Give SuSE a call at (510)628-3380
Gordon Wolfe, Ph.D. (425)865-5940
VM Technical Services, The Boeing Company
IMPORTANT: This email is intended for the use of the individual
The last figures I have for that would be about $8,800 per year, for
maintenance only. If you want problem support, that would be additional.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Kittendorf, Craig
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004
Thanks for all your help. I think that is past the point of it being
considered here.
Thanks,
Craig
-Original Message-
From: Post, Mark K [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 1:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: How much $$
The last
hi,
I am searching distributions for S390(31bit) and zSeries(64bit)
*well* maintained(with uptodate patches and erratas)
I only found:
$$$
- Red Hat Enteprise Linux 3
- SUSE LINUX Enterprise Server 7
- Based on United Linux 1
Free
- Debian 3.0
any more?
-thanks-
--
LiNUX Is Not UniX
No additions, but one correction. SUSE is currently shipping SLES8, not
SLES7.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Xose Vazquez Perez
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 1:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: distributions
hi,
I am
SuSE doesn't offer maintenance anymore (directly). It is done thru
their Partners. So, you can talk to their partners and perhaps get a
better deal.
My MP/3000 H30, no IFL, runs $4,500 a year. That is with a 10% govt
discount.
You, on the other hand, may end up getting charged for each 390
Suse Linxu Enterprise Server 8 is running here.
Suse Linux Desktop 9 is running on my Thinkpad, so I assume that a 9
is upcomming on the S390 side.
Tom Duerbusch
THD Consulting
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/10/04 12:19PM
hi,
I am searching distributions for S390(31bit) and zSeries(64bit)
*well*
Post, Mark K wrote:
No additions, but one correction. SUSE is currently shipping SLES8, not
SLES7.
I *still* see Enterprise Server 7 in SuSE's catalog:
http://www.suse.com/us/business/products/server/sles7/index.html
--
LiNUX Is Not UniX
Actually, I think that the Linux people would be much more willing to listen to the
I'm only going to use one processor story than zOS vendors. Just because you have an
IFL doesn't limit you to running Linux only in the IFL, but they only charge you for
the number of IFLs you have
They did for us on a 2 processor system - allowed us to buy 1 processor
license.
Marcy Cortes
Wells Fargo Services Company
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nix,
Robert P.
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 11:15
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Even though you set the weights to '1' processor, do you get better
throughput having 2 processors actually doing the work?
|-+---
| | Marcy Cortes|
| | [EMAIL PROTECTED]|
| | sfargo.com |
I would think not. The MP effect usually guarantees that 1 2-processor
system is significantly less than 2 1-processor systems. The amount of lost
capacity has decreased over the years, but it is still non-zero.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL
On Tuesday 10 February 2004 19:37, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
Old distribution and only 31 bits
Post, Mark K wrote:
No additions, but one correction. SUSE is currently shipping SLES8, not
SLES7.
I *still* see Enterprise Server 7 in SuSE's catalog:
Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
Post, Mark K wrote:
No additions, but one correction. SUSE is currently shipping SLES8, not
SLES7.
I *still* see Enterprise Server 7 in SuSE's catalog:
http://www.suse.com/us/business/products/server/sles7/index.html
While obviously supported... one must ask the
Carlos Romero-Martin wrote:
Old distribution and only 31 bits
NO.
SLES 7 for IBM zSeries (64-bit)
http://www.suse.com/us/business/products/server/sles7/sles_zseries/index.html
SLES 7 for S/390 and zSeries(31-bit)
http://www.suse.com/us/business/products/server/sles7/sles_s390/index.html
--
Chris Cox wrote:
While obviously supported... one must ask the question...
Why would someone want SLES7? SLES8 works with a much broader
I don't know. I was just only doing a list of distributions :-)
range of HW and SW. If you have SLES7 in house.. great...
but otherwise, if you choose
Has anyone gotten WAS 5 on z/Linux to authenticated the IBM LDAP with the
RACF back-end?
It is premature for us to go to native authentication on z/Linux, so having
WebSphere on z/Linux use the local OS for authentication is not practical.
We are attempting to configure was on z/Linux to talk to
I am new to Linux, I have an IBM z800 and have Z/VM and VSE/ESA running
on one processor and I have installed SuSE8 Linux on an IFL processor in an LPAR. I
currently have the 3590 tape drives defined as shareable and defined the VSE LPAR and
the Linux LPAR as the partitions that
We're back to 1 processor now.
I've always defined the Linux guests with 1 virtual CPU since I had 1 real
licensed. Now you've got me curious... There isn't any value to defining
more than 1 virtual CPU when you only have 1 IFL is there?
Marcy Cortes
-Original Message-
From: Linux on
Use CP Q SIGNALS to see if they are listening.
I believe I did nothing to /etc/inittab for SLES8 but instead updated the
/etc/zipl.conf to have a line like this:
parameters=dasd=0100,0201-020F root=/dev/dasdb1 vmpoff=LOGOFF
vmhalt=LOGOFF
Marcy Cortes
Wells Fargo Services Company
-Original
I tried using WAS 5.0 on Red Hat. Configured LDAP Server and RACF on
OS/390 and came close but was finally told by IBM WAS Development that SDBM
only authentication for WAS on Linux is not supported. You can always use
TDBM with DB2 but that is not an attractive option.IBM has this working
No advantage whatsoever.
Gordon Wolfe, Ph.D. (425)865-5940
VM Technical Services, The Boeing Company
IMPORTANT: This email is intended for the use of the individual addressee(s) named
above and may contain information that is confidential privileged or unsuitable for
overly sensitive persons
No, it is actually a detriment to performance.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Marcy Cortes
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 5:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: How much $$
We're back to 1 processor now.
I've always
Good - that's what I though!
Marcy Cortes
Wells Fargo Services Company
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Post,
Mark K
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 15:31
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LINUX-390] How much $$
No, it is actually a
The SCO-v-IBM thing seems to be coming up to the endgame now, but
if there's anyone who still doesn't understand why the history of unix
makes SCO's claims absurd. I've committed a small allegory which, I
hope, will explain it a bit. The Bob Att/Bob Ixen, Ellie Att/Ixen/Sco is
a little
at one time, was IBM recommending differently? i went to an introduction to
z/VM several years ago and the instructor was recommending 4 virtual CPU's
no matter how many real CPU's existed. He said that VM's multiprocessing
capability was superior to linux so it was better to queue processes to
I am searching distributions for S390(31bit) and zSeries(64bit)
*well* maintained(with uptodate patches and erratas)
I only found:
$$$
- Red Hat Enteprise Linux 3
- SUSE LINUX Enterprise Server 7
- Based on United Linux 1
Free
- Debian 3.0
We supply the up to date stable relases of
Some vendor applications are not yet certified on SLES 8. If you care about
support, running those applications on SLES 7 is the responsible thing to
do.
-- db
David Boyes
Sine Nomine Associates
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Xose
On Tue, 10 Feb 2004, Little, Chris wrote:
at one time, was IBM recommending differently? i went to an introduction to
z/VM several years ago and the instructor was recommending 4 virtual CPU's
no matter how many real CPU's existed. He said that VM's multiprocessing
capability was superior
39 matches
Mail list logo
