They have different release tracks for different products:
Home/Professional
Desktop
SLES
SLSS
The thing is, I can't find a reference on the site. I have a
reference in one of my Linux mags, but I can't find an
equivalent on the site. Would one of the SuSE/SUSE
people care to give us a clue? Ta
I have 2 z/OS LPARs and 1 SuSe Linux LPAR. I have 2 OSA/e shared between
all three of these LPARs. If I shutdown both OSA interfaces on the Linux
LPAR using ifconfig ethX down, then the VIPA becomes unresponsive on the
z/OS LPAR. If I start the OSA interfaces backup using ifconfig ethX up
the VIPA
I am running SuSE Linux under in Native LPAR mode. When I issue reboot,
Zebra does not start. I get the following message:
notice/etc/init.d/rc3.d/S09zebra start
Starting routing daemon (Zebra)startproc: signal catched /usr/sbin/zebra:
Segmentation fault
OSPFD starts fine. After I log on, I can
On Thu, 2004-03-18 at 23:10, Adam Thornton wrote:
What benefit is there to running 64-bit in a machine smaller than 2GB?
I know little about applications, but
* a commercial product may be available only in 64-bit using the 64-bit
glibc etc because the vendor says it is too much work to do
The thing is, I can't find a reference on the site. I have a
reference in one of my Linux mags, but I can't find an equivalent on
the site. Would one of the SuSE/SUSE people care to give us a clue?
Ta muchly.
I sent a note to the SUSE webmaster about this and it turns out the
US site note
I sent a note to the SUSE webmaster about this and it turns out the
US site note quite up to date (but will be very soon). Go to
http://www.suse.de/en for the 9.1 press release.
Sorry, I wasn't clear enough. I was referring to the roadmap
which I can't find on the site (neither of them as it
Formatting a 3390 eckd image, it is clearly better to
use 4096 than 1024 byte blocks!
I formatted two 3390-3 volumes, one with 1K blocks and
one with 4K blocks. I then put ext2 filesystems of 1k
and 4bk blocks respectively. (SuSE SLES8 SP3)
I could get 1.2GB and 300,947 files of 1023 bytes or
Sorry for the finger slip; I do not like MS products!
In formatting a 3390 eckd image, it is clearly better
to use 4096 than 1024 byte blocks!
I formatted two 3390-3 volumes, one with 1K blocks and
one with 4K blocks. I then put ext2 filesystems of 1k
and 4bk blocks respectively. (SuSE SLES8
I would imagine that it's more likely you ran out of inodes in both cases.
man mke2fs will talk about the -i bytes-per-inode parameter. df -i
will show you inode usage on each file system.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim
Back in the old dayslast weekG...
If I remember correctly, with a 1K block, you can utilize 53% of the
track. the rest is interblock gaps.
With 4K blocks, you can utilize 95% of the track.
Of course if the data you have fits in under 1K, then 1K blocks will
give you the most bang for the
We have run Weblogic 6.1 and 8.1. We had extremely little cpu usage. We used
ESAMON and SMART.
Ken Vance wrote:
Hi,
Has anyone else installed this product, and if so, did it run OK? One of
our developers said he installed this today, and they said it used a huge
amount of our VM cpu. I
11 matches
Mail list logo
