You probably won't get much of a flame war. I would hazard
that there is a mixture of Debian, RedHat, and SuSE, with a
lot of them being SuSE. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.
Oh, I think SuSE is by FAR the BEST one available.
Leland
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail communication
Greetings; (Posted to VMESA-L and VSE-L and LINUX-390)
- - Now in its sixth year! - - Includes VSE and linux/390!
I have set up a public service web page at
http://www.eskimo.com/~wix/vm/
for posting positions available and wanted for VM, VSE and linux/390.
Please visit the web
You probably won't get much of a flame war. I would hazard
that there
is a mixture of Debian, RedHat, and SuSE, with a lot of them being
SuSE. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.
Oh, I think SuSE is by FAR the BEST one available.
No, it's NOT Red hats can cover up
You probably won't get much of a flame war. I would hazard
that there
is a mixture of Debian, RedHat, and SuSE, with a lot of
them being
SuSE. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.
Oh, I think SuSE is by FAR the BEST one available.
No, it's NOT Red hats can cover up
On Thursday, 05/27/2004 at 09:57ZE10, Vic Cross [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Alan, Steve is only partially correct with this. Yes, you can use the
Load from CD-ROM or Server function on the HMC to start the
installation
system in the LPAR. Once started in this way, just the same as if a
tape
On Thu, 2004-05-27 at 02:13, Lucius, Leland wrote:
Oh, I think SuSE is by FAR the BEST one available.
No, it's NOT Red hats can cover up chameleons any day!!
I disagree with all of me, that Debian is so far ahead of all of them. I
mean just look at the dust it kicks up as it passes.
On Wednesday, 05/26/2004 at 09:08 EST, Little, Chris
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You probably won't get much of a flame war. I would hazard that there
is a
mixture of Debian, RedHat, and SuSE, with a lot of them being SuSE. Feel
free to correct me if I'm wrong.
SuSE just had more there early in
The directory statement for the linux guest is below:
CRYPTO DOMAIN 3 CSU * KEYENTRY SPECIAL MODIFY APVIRT
Q CRYPTO results in the response:
No CAM or DAC Crypto Facilities are installed
Crypto Adjunct Processor is installed
Ready;
Vic Cross wrote:
On Wed, 26 May 2004, Ann Smith wrote:
Hello,
I'm testing following :
DB2/udb version 8 for linux on zseries
mainframe applications are running on VSE/ESA 2.7.1
I'm testing the batch-applications running in VSE/ESA which are
connecting to DB2/UDB on linux by using TCP/IP. When we look at the
cpu-usage of the program
A week ago, I asked if anyone had a reference architecture. I only got two replies.
One was an excellent set of installation documentation and the other pointed me to
websites.
I'll ask again, a little differently this time. I am looking for best of breed on all
platforms for the variety of
I am working with two documents that cover this:
The z/Series Hipersockets redbook (may 2002), SG2406816-00 and the share
presentation Hipersockets in the Round a z/OS, z/VM, zLinux Perspective by
Frank J. De Gilio from IBM.
We have tested hipersockets from z/os to z/os and foudn that to work.
On Thu, 2004-05-27 at 08:24, James Melin wrote:
in /etc/rc.config (which was blank)
DANGER WILL ROBINSON.
SLES8 doesn't use /etc/rc.config.
You want /etc/sysconfig/network/ifcfg-hsi1
Adam
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff
in /etc/rc.config (which was blank)
pepin:/ # more /etc/rc.config
NETCONFIG=_0 _1
IPADDR_1=192.168.252.13
NETDEV_1=hsi1
IFCONFIG_1=192.168.252.13 netmask 255.255.255.0
For this linux guest the hipersocket address assigned is
192.168.252.13 as opposed to the example having
Are there any SLES-8 specific hipersockets documentation out there?
Lucius, Leland
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
olab.com To
Sent by: Linux on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
390 Port
I have made myself some how-to doc on this, and i have SLES 8 running on s390x. Here
is my Doc, it is very short really.
of course you will have to change the device id's and such to fit your configuration.
Hipersockets Configuration
1. First add an alias to the hipersocket in
On Thu, 27 May 2004, James Melin wrote:
in /etc/rc.config (which was blank)
Here's a bug in your process. SLES8 doesn't use /etc/rc.config -- but
even if it did and yours was blank, then you'd have the wrong file, I
think. I believe that the location and function of the SuSEconfig file
was
One possibility is a hardware problem with the switch. Try moving either
and both the P/390 and the router to different ports in the switch and see
if the problem remains, or follows the Linux system.
The MTU specified for your Linux system really should match that of all the
other devices on
I struggled with this one quite a while before sending it to the list.
Somehow it just seems wrong to publicize myself in this way, probably due to
my midwest upbringing. In any case, Stephen Swoyer from Enterprise Systems
Journal did an interview with me which got published online last week.
Which distribution you want depends entirely on what you're looking for. All three
distributions have good support, either from the vendor directly or through third
parties. On Intel, Red hat is more popular in the US and SuSE more popular in Europe.
Debian is considered by many to be
CRYPTO DOMAIN 3 CSU * KEYENTRY SPECIAL MODIFY APVIRT
You probably don't need all of this. According to the ZSeries Crypto Guide Redbook,
Linux guests don't use domains or CSU's. They don't use the CCF at all. All you
should need should be 'CRYPTO APVIRT'. If you're using VM:Secure, make
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 09:13:09AM -0700, Wolfe, Gordon W wrote:
Debian has a reputation for being closer to the cutting edge of newest
technology. I haven't worked with it, so I can't speak much to it.
It does? Debian releases are less frequent than other vendors, so on the
basis of
P/390 linux 192.168.2.3***
P/390 OS/2 192.168.2.2*s*
Station 1 192.168.2.4*w*
Station 2 192.168.2.5*i*
router 192.168.2.1*t*
*c*
*t*
*h*
***
All are
I've done some testing. and I don't see a speed improvement for FTP of
a large file via FTP to a hipersocket address vs a GBE ethernet connection.
I did an ftp to the IP address of a Linux guest, and then repeated the send
of that file to the same guest via the hipersocket defined for it. The
On Thursday, 05/27/2004 at 01:31 EST, James Melin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've done some testing. and I don't see a speed improvement for FTP
of
a large file via FTP to a hipersocket address vs a GBE ethernet
connection.
I did an ftp to the IP address of a Linux guest, and then repeated
Hello,
We use dataprotector too for HPUX and Netbackup for AIX. Both haven't
clients for linux on Z/series.
Only Netbackup have planned to develop a client.
Ranga Nathan wrote:
We use Data Protector (HP 'closed'ware) to backup our HP unix boxes and
Redhat Intel with a special client.
Has anyone
*** Reply to note of Thu, 27 May 2004 13:31:06 -0500 (EST/CDT)
*** by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Do you have an entry for the hipersocket device in
/etc/sysconfig/network/routes? For example:
192.168.252.0 0.0.0.0255.255.255.0 hsi1
default 137.70.100.3 0.0.0.0 eth0
James Melin
IMHO, SuSE seems to be more zSeries friendly.
Some differences:
- SuSE SLES8 allows the hertz timer to be turned on or
off, depending on whether your are under VM or not.
RedHat RHEL3 does not - hence you may have a
performance issue with RedHat under VM with idle
machines.
- Redhat does not
My two cents:
Cheers;
E!
Eric Wilson
IBM Certified Advanced Technical Expert
RedHat Certified Engineer
-Original Message-
From: Jim Sibley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2004 2:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:SuSE vs Red Hat
IMHO, SuSE seems
You don't. You let them figure it out. First, by telling them what servers
to contact for whatever is needed. This results in a call to a DNS
resolver, which returns an IP address. At that point, it's all routing.
(Everyone's favorite TCP/IP topic.)
As Sal pointed out, what you would need to
No big surprise there. HP isn't terribly interested in promoting hardware
sales for their competitors.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thomas
Durand
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2004 3:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Data
If it's SLES 8, cd to /etc/sysconfig/network and take a look at the
interface def in there. Yast2 ought to show it to you too.
Marcy Cortes
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of James
Melin
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 12:13 PM
To: [EMAIL
On Wednesday, 05/26/2004 at 05:08 AST, Ann Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IBM configured our PCICA card to our VM LPAR that runs linux but we see
the following errors:
600 May 26 08:03:24 hostl1 kernel: z90crypt: Hardware error
601 May 26 08:03:24 hostl1 kernel: z90crypt: Type 82 Message
Answers inline, below:
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Jim
Sibley
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2004 2:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SuSE vs Red Hat
IMHO, SuSE seems to be more zSeries friendly.
Some differences:
- SuSE SLES8
Went to see if there were any samba3 package updates for s390 today and
found the following link no longer valid:
ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/gd/samba3
Anyone happen to know if that's officially gone or just maybe moved to
another location on their site?
*Brandon Darbro
Hello,
We are currently running TSM Server on our z/os system and are very close to moving
TSM to Linux running on Z/VM. I noticed that you are running Linux/VM and are always
a reference for TSM, do you have any plans to run your TSM Server on Linux running on
z/vm? We've gone thru the the
Sorry, but who is this addressed to? You didn't identify that.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris
Prosperi
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2004 5:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: LInux Z/vm
Hello,
We are currently running
Anyone else having problems getting to the SuSE Support Portal??
Could not connect all day yesterday.
Dave Myers
Denver Solutions Group
Senior Systems Engineer
Office Phone: (303) 996-7112
Cellular Phone: (303) 619-0782
Home Office: (303) 948-0027
Fax: (303) 706.1713
37 matches
Mail list logo
