VM VSE linux/390 Employment Web Page

2004-07-15 Thread Dennis G. Wicks
Greetings; (Posted to VMESA-L and VSE-L and LINUX-390) - - Now in its sixth year! - - Includes VSE and linux/390! I have set up a public service web page at http://www.eskimo.com/~wix/vm/ for posting positions available and wanted for VM, VSE and linux/390. Please visit the web

Re: Progress on PL/1 for Linux

2004-07-15 Thread David Boyes
Aside from different directories for where things live on my system, that's pretty much what I did as well. -Original Message- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ferguson, Neale I did: ./configure --enable-threads=posix --prefix=/opt/gcc

2004-07-14 Recommended Linux for zSeries code drop to developerWorks

2004-07-15 Thread Gerhard Hiller
Please see the What's New page at: http://www10.software.ibm.com/developerworks/opensource/linux390/whatsnew.shtml for a change summary of the 2004-07-14 additions and changes to the Linux for zSeries and S/390 developerWorks Web pages. June 2003 stream: o kernel 2.4.21: Kernel patch with

Re: Progress on PL/1 for Linux

2004-07-15 Thread Post, Mark K
This did turn out to be the case. My version of flex was the same, so once I upgraded to the same version of bison, the last problem went away, and I was able to get a clean build. I did report to the maintainer that he needs to fix his Makefile fragment so that configure can be run from a

Performance of large file systems

2004-07-15 Thread Thomas Denier
We are considerng a file organization with rather unusual characteristics, and are wondering if we are likely to run into performance pathologies. The proposed file organization would be used to provide a TSM server with a family of sequential storage pools sharing a single device class with

Re: Performance of large file systems

2004-07-15 Thread Adam Thornton
On Thu, 2004-07-15 at 09:21, Thomas Denier wrote: We are considerng a file organization with rather unusual characteristics, and are wondering if we are likely to run into performance pathologies. I don't see anything, since there are plenty of paths to the DASD. However, it's impossible to

Re: Performance of large file systems

2004-07-15 Thread David Boyes
On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 10:21:24AM -0400, Thomas Denier wrote: We would use LVM to assemble a large number of ESCON 3390 volumes into a single file system with a size in the hundreds of gigabytes. This would be an ext3 file system with metadata journalling. One thing to keep in mind is that

Re: Performance of large file systems

2004-07-15 Thread James Melin
There is also a paper out there on using PAV with LVM volumes. That might improve your performance as well. I don't recall the name of the paper or the link to it, as it was dropped on my desk printed and is now on someone elses desk, but the gist was that with LVM, you can certainly take

Re: Network freezes

2004-07-15 Thread Tom Anderson
Adam could well be on the right track: if this application is the type to create new threads/processes for each network connection and you aren't getting good i/o throughput, it can start a chain of events that leads to the symptom you are seeing: many network connections (processes), not

Re: Progress on PL/1 for Linux

2004-07-15 Thread Richard Troth
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004, Ulrich Weigand wrote: Note that building in the source directory has been known to not work reliably for the GCC tree. In fact, there even have been discussions to officially declare this unsupported ... I have to speak up about this. Hopefully the maintainers will hear

Re: Performance of large file systems

2004-07-15 Thread Marcy Cortes
You might want to see if you can get FICON instead of ESCON. Marcy Cortes This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on this

Re: Progress on PL/1 for Linux

2004-07-15 Thread Richard Troth
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004, Post, Mark K wrote: ... I did report to the maintainer that he needs to fix his Makefile fragment so that configure can be run from a different directory. ... can be as the operative phrase is fine and good. Just as long as the GCC team doesn't turn that into must be. --

Bash script question

2004-07-15 Thread dclark
I have cut some lines of code out of a bash script I am trying to execute. snip T2=NONE T1=$_PAGESIZE if [ $T2 = $T1 ]; then snip I ran this using the -x option at the start of the script for debugging and it produced the following results. + T2=NONE + T1=NONE + '[' NONE = $'NONE\r' ']' Will

Re: Performance of large file systems

2004-07-15 Thread Ledbetter, Scott E
FICON would help with the data transfer, but PAV is what would help with the multiple simultaneous reads/writes. Since you are ESCON, you are not PAV capable, so the next best solution would be to spread the data across as many volumes as possible. If you have a control unit capable of creating

Re: Bash script question

2004-07-15 Thread McKown, John
-Original Message- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2004 11:59 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Bash script question I have cut some lines of code out of a bash script I am trying to execute. snip

Re: Bash script question

2004-07-15 Thread Post, Mark K
It's not that \r was appended to the if clause, it is that the value of the _PAGESIZE variable is: 'NONE\r' as opposed to this: NONE\r How that variable gets that value assigned to it is unknown, since you don't show that section of the code. Mark Post -Original Message- From: Linux

Re: Bash script question

2004-07-15 Thread dclark
The variable is valued using the following statement read _PRINTQ _PRTENBL _PRTURI _PRTDESC _BLDING _LOCDESC _PPDLOC _PAGESIZE The \r is not apart of the file being read. The file read has 8 fields and PAGESIZE is the last one. It seems to be that \r is a part of the carriage return /

Process fault 03B

2004-07-15 Thread Lee Stewart
Hi... During a new SLES8 install, has anyone ever seen a: user process fault 03B during an install? This happened while in Yast, right after formatting the dasd (dasdfmt, fdasd, in the separate ssh session), then going back to Yast, selecting New Install, then the yast session closed and the

Re: Bash script question

2004-07-15 Thread Ward, Garry
Perfectly, for a non mainframe world that has no concept of LRECL and BLKSIZE -Original Message- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2004 1:50 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bash script question The variable is

Re: Process fault 03B

2004-07-15 Thread Ferguson, Neale
You are installing 64-bit system then? From the deeper recesses of my mind (where most fear to go): You need to boot with a parmline containing nopfault. Once you apply SP3 you can get rid of that. -Original Message- Hi... During a new SLES8 install, has anyone ever seen a: user

Re: Process fault 03B

2004-07-15 Thread Rich Smrcina
How much virtual storage is defined for the guest? On Thu, 2004-07-15 at 12:54, Lee Stewart wrote: Hi... During a new SLES8 install, has anyone ever seen a: user process fault 03B during an install? This happened while in Yast, right after formatting the dasd (dasdfmt, fdasd, in the

Re: Bash script question

2004-07-15 Thread Fargusson.Alan
Yes. I think if you look carefully you will see that each record in your file ends with a CR-LF pair (which is \r\n). Linux does not use a \r\n as end of line. The \r is part of the data. So when you added a field, the \r became part of the new field. Are you getting this file from a

Re: Bash script question

2004-07-15 Thread Post, Mark K
Tell me, was the file being read created on a Windows system, or a Linux/UNIX system? (I'm guessing Windows.) Mark Post -Original Message- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2004 1:50 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

linux performance

2004-07-15 Thread Levy, Alan
Our first production linux machine will be stress tested on Monday with Mercury Interactive (by someone else here). While the test is going on, is there anything I can do to monitor both linux and ZVM 4.4 ? Any suggestions on commands, processes, etc ? TIA Alan Levy W:

Re: Process fault 03B

2004-07-15 Thread Lee Stewart
256MB... Lee At 12:04 PM 7/15/2004, you wrote: How much virtual storage is defined for the guest? On Thu, 2004-07-15 at 12:54, Lee Stewart wrote: Hi... During a new SLES8 install, has anyone ever seen a: user process fault 03B during an install? This happened while in Yast, right after

Re: Bash script question

2004-07-15 Thread dclark
It was originally created on a windows system. -Original Message- From: Post, Mark K [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2004 11:00 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bash script question Tell me, was the file being read created on a Windows system, or a Linux/UNIX

Re: Bash script question

2004-07-15 Thread Ferguson, Neale
Run the dos2unix command against the file and try again. -Original Message- It was originally created on a windows system. -- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL

Re: Process fault 03B

2004-07-15 Thread Rich Smrcina
You don't mention mke2fs. Did you run that after fdasd? On Thu, 2004-07-15 at 13:09, Lee Stewart wrote: 256MB... Lee At 12:04 PM 7/15/2004, you wrote: How much virtual storage is defined for the guest? On Thu, 2004-07-15 at 12:54, Lee Stewart wrote: Hi... During a new SLES8

Re: Bash script question

2004-07-15 Thread Post, Mark K
If you remove all the Windows line-endings, you won't need your workaround. If the file gets periodically re-created and uploaded, you can either: Do an ASCII transfer, which will also remove the Windows line-endings Do a binary transfer and leave your workaround in place. Obviously, the first

Re: Progress on PL/1 for Linux

2004-07-15 Thread Ulrich Weigand
Richard Troth wrote: PLEASE DO NOT BREAK THE IN-SOURCE BUILD OF GCC. It is not being deliberately broken. However, since just about every GCC developer always builds outside the tree, breakage of in-tree builds can be easily overlooked. This, together with some technical points why in-tree

Which zSeries Linux Distributions and Why?

2004-07-15 Thread Victor Strasser
Which zLinux distributions are you using, and why did you pick that one? Also, can anyone explain what Red Hat was thinking when they wrote IBM zSeries s/390 subscriptions include the ability to run and support up 25 Enterprise Linux AS instances/images per subscription, per engine? IBM's

Re: Which zSeries Linux Distributions and Why?

2004-07-15 Thread Fargusson.Alan
Red Hat was probably thinking that this would generate more revenue. IBM generates revenue on hardware support, so software is not as important as it is to Red Hat. -Original Message- From: Victor Strasser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2004 11:50 AM To: [EMAIL

Re: Which zSeries Linux Distributions and Why?

2004-07-15 Thread Adam Thornton
On Thu, 2004-07-15 at 13:50, Victor Strasser wrote: Also, can anyone explain what Red Hat was thinking when they wrote IBM zSeries s/390 subscriptions include the ability to run and support up 25 Enterprise Linux AS instances/images per subscription, per engine? Step 3: PROFIT! Adam

Re: Which zSeries Linux Distributions and Why?

2004-07-15 Thread McKown, John
-Original Message- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Victor Strasser Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2004 1:50 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Which zSeries Linux Distributions and Why? Which zLinux distributions are you using, and why did you pick

Linux 2.6 Kernel

2004-07-15 Thread Scully, William P
I'm trying to figure out how to avoid getting messages such as the following as boot scripts are running: getpt: No such file or directory could not get pty for /etc/init.d/boot.d/S06boot.md My goal is to force certain directories in the tree to be R/O instead of R/W. But I'm at a loss as

Re: Which zSeries Linux Distributions and Why?

2004-07-15 Thread David Boyes
Which zLinux distributions are you using, and why did you pick that one? 1) Marist 2.2-vintage distribution Because people still ask questions about it. 2) SuSE 7.0 Because people still ask questions about it. 3) SLES 7 Because there are a lot of early adopters who haven't

Re: Process fault 03B

2004-07-15 Thread Lee Stewart
Yast will run the mke2fs (etc.) with no problem after the dasdfmt and fdasd are run manually. So no, we hadn't run the mke2fs manually... The problem does seem to be the enhanced page fault processing for 64-bit systems only... Apparently you need BOTH VM APAR VM62840 (if you're 4.2 or lower)

MD-dev and barrier

2004-07-15 Thread Jim Sibley
I have some doc that refers to MD devices and boot option barrier. What devices do they mean and what does barrier do? = Jim Sibley Computers are useless.They can only give answers. Pablo Picasso (The NSHO's expressed here represents no-one but myself). __

Re: Which zSeries Linux Distributions and Why?

2004-07-15 Thread Marcy Cortes
We initially picked SuSE back in 2001 because they were shipping the OSA support and seemed to have more vendors on board (i.e. Oracle went there first). My boss keeps saying he'll get RedHat too if someone has a good reason technical reason to run it in addition to SuSE (and that reason is not

Re: MD-dev and barrier

2004-07-15 Thread Post, Mark K
MD = multiple device = software raid I don't have any idea about the barrier piece. Mark Post -Original Message- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim Sibley Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2004 4:28 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: MD-dev and barrier I have

Re: MD-dev and barrier

2004-07-15 Thread Robert J Brenneman
barrier refers to barrier writes. I have no idea what it means to hardware, but when Linux on z tries to do barrier writes to SCSI disk on a shark with multipathing, it fails. ( at least, with current code it does ) basically it means when you mount multipathed SCSI devices, you have to mount it

Re: Which zSeries Linux Distributions and Why?

2004-07-15 Thread Ann Smith
What do you mean by a zSeries and s/390 'subscription' ? Is the subscription the license to run linux or the support contract? We run SuSE SLES8 (now Novell). The license and upgrade protection is by number of IFL engines. You also need to pay more to get both 31-bit and 64-bit. What RedHat's

Problem with S/390 SuSE's Online Update

2004-07-15 Thread conway, heather
Hi All, I am urgently hoping that you can help me out. I am working with SLES 8 on a z800 and attempted to perform an Online Update via YaST2 on the Linux LPAR and now it no longer boots. The config is as follows: z800 LPAR allocated for the Linux partition 2 3390 CKD devices have been allocated

Re: Problem with S/390 SuSE's Online Update

2004-07-15 Thread Post, Mark K
I'm guessing (and I do mean guessing) that your kernel got over-written by a new one and/or the initrd wasn't re-created as it should have been, and/or zipl wasn't re-run after it was all over. IPL from your installation tape. Insmod the dasd_mod module with your DASD device numbers

Re: Linux 2.6.7 Patch Status (LONG)

2004-07-15 Thread Post, Mark K
Ok, I read what you and Arnd wrote, then went back to my comparisons between 2.6.5 and 2.6.7. Your explanations didn't help me figure out what is needed to get a current 2.6.7 kernel because of: 1. You're using names for patches that aren't publicly known, such as The multicast notifier patch -

Re: Which zSeries Linux Distributions and Why?

2004-07-15 Thread Post, Mark K
Red Hat refers to their licenses as subscriptions (since they're renewable annually I guess) in some cases. Perhaps they're trying to make it clear that you're not buying the software permanently, just licensing it. (That doesn't really ring true either, since you can continue to use the

linux performance

2004-07-15 Thread Barton Robinson
Use MONWRITE to collect VM Monitor data. East steps: Create the monitor dcss large enough to be functional, the default is not functional. 'DEFSEG MONDCSS A000-AFFF SC RSTD' 'SAVESEG MONDCSS' Enable All domains as follows: 'MONITOR SAMPLE ENABLE ALL' 'MONITOR EVENT ENABLE SCHEDULER USERID

Re: Linux 2.6.7 Patch Status (LONG)

2004-07-15 Thread Ulrich Weigand
Mark Post wrote: (I'll leave it to Arnd or Martin to answer the details, but just a couple of general comments ...) 1. You're using names for patches that aren't publicly known, such as The multicast notifier patch - linux-2.6.5-s390-04-26-april2004.diff Huh? That's straight off

Test

2004-07-15 Thread Gregg C Levine
We are testing our connection to the Internet. Please disregard. --- Gregg C Levine [EMAIL PROTECTED] The Force will be with you...Always. Obi-Wan Kenobi Use the Force, Luke.  Obi-Wan Kenobi

Re: Test

2004-07-15 Thread Tom Shilson
George, you have posted many times before. What gives? _/) Tom Shilson ~GEDW VM System Services Aloha Tel: 651-733-7591 tshilson at mmm dot com Fax: 651-736-7689