Greetings; (Posted to VMESA-L and VSE-L and LINUX-390)
- - Now in its sixth year! - - Includes VSE and linux/390!
I have set up a public service web page at
http://www.eskimo.com/~wix/vm/
for posting positions available and wanted for VM, VSE and linux/390.
Please visit the web
Why do I get better response time when I use small disks in RVA?
3390-3 and 3390-9 disks are emulated the same way (thinking
about data
spreaded across all physical devices)?
You can have only one I/O in progress to each physical device at a time
(since Linux doesn't do PAV yet). If you use a
James,
I'll add my two cents, but I'll first add the disclaimer that I've read
and written about this, but don't use it in production from day to day (so
add two grains of salt to the two cents :))
All the documentation they have shown me indicates that it can get time
from an SNTP time source
well from what I've been told, all they want to be able to do is have the
primary and secondary domain controllers get the time from an NTP/SNTP
source. Everyone else will synch to the PDC/SDC They tried to do this
against my z/os SNTP server (which I have all sorts of things getting time
- all
When I did a DIRM DASD, I found this:
DASD USEDEXT VOLUME LIN030 LIN031 LIN032
GROUP REGION VOLUMESTART SIZE (END) OWNER ADDR SA
NOTES
-- -- -- --
-
**LIN030 0 1
Hello Ranga,
the CP link fails because someone else has the disk you are cloning
linked.
Lookup message HCP105E for explanation.
Best regards,
Pieter Harder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel +31-73-6837133 / +31-6-47272537
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/13 5:16
When I clonedisk, it usually takes a long time and
OK, I recall that. There was indeed an overlap. An arithmetic problem :-)
I went from 1651 start to 1551, overlapping 100 cylinders.
Sorry, did not notice it :-)
__
Ranga Nathan / CSG
Systems Programmer - Specialist; Technical Services;
BAX Global Inc.
Preaching to the choir, Alan. I think we managed to get them to talk to
the z/os time server I alread had established... time will tell.
Fargusson.Alan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
tb.ca.gov To
Sent by:
Tom,
I've installed both SLES 8 and SLES 9 (64 bit) under z/VM 5.1.0. I had
lots of problems, but most were due to my inexperience with Linux. Actually
installing the files was not a problem, though. I used an FTP server on
my Windows XP system named GuildFTP (a successor to War, I gather). I
Ok installing Suse 9.0 has been, still is, may always be, a bear.
SMB installs is the best/easiest from this clients perspective.
So, while I have some time to sit back and wait for the return of my
disk drives, it is time to dot the 't's and cross the 'i'sG.
When SMB seemed to be a total no-go, I
Well, the ntptrace command says that avi-lis.gw.lightning.net is a stratum 1
server. That would make yours a stratum 2. I just tried to verify that
from one of my systems, but I don't get any response from
avi-lis.gw.lightning.net. For that matter, it doesn't show up in any of the
lists at
I downloaded the CD images by starting at:
http://www.novell.com/linux/, selecting
Novell Linux Downloads and Evals on the right hand side of the page,
Then Download SUSE LINUX Enterprise Server 9 in the middle of that page,
Then SUSE LINUX Enterprise Server 9 for IBM zSeries and S/390 in the
Thanks
Yep, that is where I got the iso images from. BTW, I noticed you didn't
say what size your CD6 was. Do you have one available to quickly check
its size?
I've ordered the CDs. I should get the CDs well before I get the
mainframe disk drives back to try NFS.
I'll do the md5sum tomorrow
679772160 SLES-9-i386-RC5-CD6.iso
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom
Duerbusch
Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2005 5:05 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Suse 9.0 CD Validation
Thanks
Yep, that is where I got the
You had me going there for a moment.
This is s390, not i386 G
Tom Duerbusch
THD Consulting
Post, Mark K wrote:
679772160 SLES-9-i386-RC5-CD6.iso
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom
Duerbusch
Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2005 5:05
Here is the specific files I have stored on my system.
SLES-9-s390x-RC5-CD6.iso 64 Bit version; Size = 664,592,384
I ran md5sum SLES-9-s390x-RC5-CD6.iso which yielded:
74301159228f91a4da4a2bb78cb607aa *SLES-9-s390x-RC5-CD6.iso
SLES-9-s390-RC5-CD6.iso 32 Bit version; Size = 664,590,336
I
So when did you download your s390 version?
I just downloaded it again. (Suse 9.0 on intel with Netscape).
The chksum was:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ md5sum SLES-9-s390-RC5-CD6.iso
94b427218460e44488f610610e6b73b8 SLES-9-s390-RC5-CD6.iso
which was bad.
And still only 19MB out of 633.8 MB shown on the
Just to check, I started a new download. It's currently at 168MB and
climbing.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom
Duerbusch
Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2005 10:54 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Suse 9.0 CD
18 matches
Mail list logo
