Greetings; (Posted to VMESA-L and VSE-L and LINUX-390)
- - Now in its seventh year! - - Includes VSE and linux/390!
I have set up a public service web page at
http://www.eskimo.com/~wix/vm/
for posting positions available and wanted for VM, VSE and linux/390.
Please visit the web
Hi list.
I currently have a z/VM 4.4 and our first goal is to migrate it into our new
zSeries processor (z/890 2086 A04 230).
I have requested IBM Service for getting the required APARs PTFs to make
this possible.
The problem I have (after having taken a look at the z/VM 4.4 Service Guide)
is
Hi José,
The better metod is to make a RSU procedure
It's easy.
Carlos Romero-Martin
System Engineer Consultant
Jeeves System Group N.V.
Belgium
+32247855987
-- Original Message --
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 10:07:12 +0200
Reply-To: Linux on 390 Port LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
From: José Raúl
Hello!
Is it possible to use ntp server to synchronise z/OS time (without
external timer)?
Thanks
Istvn
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message:
Guys,
I've configured two ethernet interfaces with a dummy
interface in order to have an High Availability
network. I'm using Zebra for dynamic routing.
I was able to work with this system only changing the
ethernet MTU from 1492 (Linux default) to 1500...
Seems related to my router configuration
It is the (virtual) network infrastructure that imposes the
payload restrictions, hence the MTU size. I case of QDIO the
VSWITCH supports any MTU the attached (coupled) vNICs support, too.
If you use a VSWITCH to interconnect guest virtual NICs with a
distributed switched fabric over OSA Express,
From mainframe_s390:
Please teach me.
I want to comfirm VSWITCH's MTU size.
SLES9's eth0 connected to the VSWITCH is MTU 9000.
But VSWITCH's MTU size isn't diplayed on screen by using
Q VSWITCH DETAILS command.
VSWITCH don't have MTU??
I want to use eth0 for MTU size 9000.
The QDIO virtual
Hello,
I have problem installing SLES9 on a IBM 990 with z/VM 4.4.
When the installation starts it can't reach the gateway (The ping test fails).
This happens 95% of the times i'm trying.
When it works as it should the installation fails anyway on 75% saying
Installing boot loader... and then
At 07:38 AM 6/9/2005, you wrote:
Hello,
I have problem installing SLES9 on a IBM 990 with z/VM 4.4.
When the installation starts it can't reach the gateway (The ping test fails).
This happens 95% of the times i'm trying.
When it works as it should the installation fails anyway on 75% saying
I just went and looked up the relative path. Had it wrong. Sorry, still
trying to grasp this new stuff. Here it is...../../mnt/cdrom
At 08:03 AM 6/9/2005, Brian France wrote:
At 07:38 AM 6/9/2005, you wrote:
Hello,
I have problem installing SLES9 on a IBM 990 with z/VM 4.4.
When the
Hi list,
i tried to enable the VM Shared Kernel Support in SLES9.
After installation of SLES9 i performed following steps:
cd /usr/sr/linux
make cloneconfig
make menuconfig (to enable VM Shared Kernel Support)
make image
cp image /boot/image-nss
zipl iplnss
After rebooting the system cat
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Istvan Nemeth
Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 3:18 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: ot: z/OS + ntp
Hello!
Is it possible to use ntp server to synchronise z/OS time (without
external
On Jun 9, 2005, at 3:35 AM, Max wrote:
Guys,
I've configured two ethernet interfaces with a dummy
interface in order to have an High Availability
network. I'm using Zebra for dynamic routing.
I was able to work with this system only changing the
ethernet MTU from 1492 (Linux default) to 1500...
We recently applied AIX 5.2 ML05 and now NMON V9A stopped working and
displays the following message:
/nmon/nmon64
no AIX version (can't run lslpp)
nmon file=nmon9.c line=2270 version=v9a
The lslpp command seems to run file and topas also still runs normally.
NMON 9A is the most recent
try:
EXPORT NMONAIX=5.2.0.0
and then run nmon.
-Kevin Callahan
At 11:15 AM 6/9/2005, you wrote:
We recently applied AIX 5.2 ML05 and now NMON V9A stopped working and
displays the following message:
/nmon/nmon64
no AIX version (can't run lslpp)
nmon file=nmon9.c line=2270 version=v9a
Not being a database person I need to ask this rather general question.
What do I need in my SLES9 system to allow PHP to get data from an Oracle
database that is running on another system (z/OS or Sun)?
/Tom Kern
__
Discover Yahoo!
Get
Thank you for answers.
(B
(BPlease teach me again.
(BI use two type of OSA cards.
(BOne is OSA Express 1000base card, the other is OSA
(BExpress2(with 2port type) card.
(BI recognize both OSAs are supported large MTU.
(BIs it right?
(B
(BAnd z/VM's TCPIP is defined MTU 1500 by IPWIZARD
Thanks
The kind of stuff I was looking for.
Being old, I do not favor transmitting data over communications. It
usually is higher overhead then transmission over hardware.
i.e. transmission over IP, to get to escon-tape, instead of just
writting to tape.
And that got reinforced with my
On Jun 9, 2005, at 1:24 PM, Tom Duerbusch wrote:
But I'm still not convinced that Amanda is/will be our backup
solution.
TSM initially sounded good, but it required scsi attached tape drives
(i.e. FCP attached), and at this point, I don't want to have separate
FICON and FCP attached tape
Being old, I do not favor transmitting data over communications. It
usually is higher overhead then transmission over hardware.
On the other hand, if you're talking about networking over shared memory
-- which is really what a guest LAN is -- then the amount of latency is
so much smaller than
On 6/9/05, Tobias Dêrkes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i tried to enable the VM Shared Kernel Support in SLES9.
After installation of SLES9 i performed following steps:
cd /usr/sr/linux
make cloneconfig
make menuconfig (to enable VM Shared Kernel Support)
make image
cp image /boot/image-nss
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Thomas Kern
Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 11:24 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: PHP connectivity to Oracle
Not being a database person I need to ask this rather general
question.
What
I have a minidisk with a valid reiserfs file system. In a running SuSE9
system, I CP link to the mdisk, read-only, activate it and attempted a
mount; the mount fails. It seems like it wants to replay the transaction,
even for a read-only.
I was able to mount successfully the same reiserfs mdisk
On Jun 9, 2005, at 4:05 PM, Ifurung, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a minidisk with a valid reiserfs file system. In a running
SuSE9
system, I CP link to the mdisk, read-only, activate it and attempted a
mount; the mount fails. It seems like it wants to replay the
transaction,
even for a
So add device range=150(ro) /proc/dasd/devices, for instance.
That's it, it works, altho for SuSE9, it uses different command sets:
chccwdev -e 0.0.1200 /*set it online; adds it to /proc/dasd/devices */
echo 1 /sys/bus/ccw/devices/0.0.1200/readonly
I never can find any documentation on
I wasn't really talking about the latency, but of the overhead of
breaking data down and put it in packets, with header info, etc,
transmitting thru/to another process which reads the header,
reconstruct
the data just to turn around it write it to tape.
Right? Write to tape is still faster
26 matches
Mail list logo
