On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 19:07 +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
Hi Alexey,
CC arch/s390/kernel/setup.o
arch/s390/kernel/setup.c: In function `do_machine_restart_nonsmp':
arch/s390/kernel/setup.c:271: error: too few arguments to function `__cpcmd'
arch/s390/kernel/setup.c: In function
On Wednesday 11 January 2006 17:07, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
CC arch/s390/kernel/setup.o
arch/s390/kernel/setup.c: In function `do_machine_restart_nonsmp':
arch/s390/kernel/setup.c:271: error: too few arguments to function
`__cpcmd' arch/s390/kernel/setup.c: In function
The reason Mike did his mksles9root script to prepare the file tree is
that this way you install the latest versions from the service pack
rather than the older base levels.
Yes, that and because working with individual loopback-mounted-ISO-CDs
seems to be tricky at best (and if you want to
The iso files I see on the Novell web site are named
SLES-9-SP-3-s390-GM-CD1.iso (for CD 1 of the s390 version.) So I
think you need to change RC4a in all the names to GM.
On 1/12/06, Michael MacIsaac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The reason Mike did his mksles9root script to prepare the file tree
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 10:33:22AM +0100, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 19:07 +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
Hi Alexey,
CC arch/s390/kernel/setup.o
arch/s390/kernel/setup.c: In function `do_machine_restart_nonsmp':
arch/s390/kernel/setup.c:271: error: too few
Sorry for the intrusion...but since there are quite
a few very knowledgable IBMers on this list, I was
hoping some kind soul would help...
Delete now or forever hold your peace ;-)
Anyway, I'm attempting to install curl from the IBM AIX
toolkit downloads page, and the rpm fails on:
error:
We have one customer area that is pretty insistent on trying to run a Weblogic
application with a SUN JDK. They are runnning on a 64-bit SLES9 server. We have
told them that it would not be a vendor certified configuration (BEA says to
use IBM 1.4.2 s1ra). We also stated our IBM support
On Thu, 2006-01-12 at 15:54 +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
FYI, s390 on UP is currently broken in other ways:
CC [M] drivers/s390/block/dasd.o
drivers/s390/block/dasd.c: In function `dasd_setup_queue':
drivers/s390/block/dasd.c:1638: error: too few arguments to function
We have one customer area that is pretty insistent on trying
to run a Weblogic application with a SUN JDK. They are
runnning on a 64-bit SLES9 server. We have told them that it
would not be a vendor certified configuration (BEA says to
use IBM 1.4.2 s1ra). We also stated our IBM support
Because no one has ported the HotSpot/JIT code (which is architecture
dependent) to s390. Sun uses their Hotspot compiler to take the Java byte
codes and create native s390 instruction sequences. I ported the 1.2 and 1.3
JDKs when they still used a Just In Time compiler (JIT) but hesitated when
Slightly off-topic, but I wonder how long until someone decides to port
OpenSolaris to s390? I read that the port to PPC reached an operational
state in the last week.
-Sam
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
David Boyes
Sent: Thursday,
There was talk of this late last fall. If they are still interested in
working on it, I'm sure they'll either pipe up or let folks know when
it's ready.
Kielek, Samuel wrote:
Slightly off-topic, but I wonder how long until someone decides to port
OpenSolaris to s390? I read that the port to
Slightly off-topic, but I wonder how long until someone
decides to port OpenSolaris to s390? I read that the port to
PPC reached an operational state in the last week.
Watch this space. 8-)
-- db
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe
As David pointed out, Sun doesn't provide binaries for anything to run
on IBM's mainframe architecture. In the general case, though, the
question of why boils down to what ever the ISV decides is in their
best interests as a business, since it takes quite a bit of time and
money to certify and
I'll bet that if you do an rpm -qa | sort outputfile on both systems
and compare them, you'll find out that RPM doesn't think they are
configured the same.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
PAUL WILLIAMSON
Sent: Thursday,
Obviously ;-) Otherwise I'd be able to install curl on the
problem child. I just don't see where the problem is in
terms of library support...
(...going to rpm -qa on both machines...)
I just did that, then did a diff on the two files and came up with
a handful of apps not installed on the
Ok, the next step then is to query RPM on the system that has curl
installed to find out what package RPM thinks provided the library.
rpm -qf /path/to/libc.a Then check to see if that is installed on the
system where curl doesn't want to go on. If RPM says that the file is
not owned by any
On 1/11/06, Post, Mark K [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If the RPM name has noarch in it, it means it does not contain any
binary files specific to a particular architecture. If it has i386,
s390x, or anything like that, it is almost guaranteed to not run on any
architecture other than the one
It doesn't surprise me this probably happened...
#:/rpm -qf /usr/lib/libc.a
file /usr/lib/libc.a is not owned by any package
Oh well, I hate doing a nodeps rpm...any suggestions?
I know libc was fixed to comply with some linux standards,
but I can't seem to find out what libc.a is provided by...
The updated script, with the correct SP3 GA .iso file names is now
available. http://linuxvm.org/Patches/#mksles9root
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Michael MacIsaac
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 8:00 AM
To:
Bite the bullet and use --nodeps. When RPM isn't used to install
everything on a system, you usually have to wind up doing this. Or,
converting the RPM to whatever format the native package management tool
uses, and using that.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port
McKown, John wrote:
Linux is Not Windows
Granted, more oriented towards the desktop crowd, but hopefully on-topic
enough. If not, I apologize. The only thing that I see wrong with it is
that the author does not get libre != gratis. He states that FOSS is
free. He states that there is no
Ranga Nathan wrote:
Is the RHCE, Redhat-spefic? Is it useful across the distros?
I've been dabbling in RH for years, Debian for a couple, and SUSE 10
very recently.
SUSE is a very rude shock, and I'm very inclined to ditch it on that
account.
My RH experience was more helpful with Debian
PAUL WILLIAMSON wrote:
It doesn't surprise me this probably happened...
#:/rpm -qf /usr/lib/libc.a
file /usr/lib/libc.a is not owned by any package
Oh well, I hate doing a nodeps rpm...any suggestions?
I know libc was fixed to comply with some linux standards,
but I can't seem to find out
Is there a way to get vmcp to return the CP return code rather than 1?
hcp behaves as I'd expect:
# hcp q linux04
HCPCQU045E LINUX04 not logged on
# echo $?
45
But vmcp seems to return only 0 or 1:
# vmcp q linux04
HCPCQU045E LINUX04 not logged on
Error: non-zero CP response for command 'Q
Some time ago we had a long discussion about return codes from HCP or VMCP. They
are different. HCP behaves almost like a CMS programer would expect. VMCP
behaves more like a UNIX programer would expect. You get to choose. If you don't
like either one then write your own command.
[EMAIL
Hello,
We have a WebSphere application running on 4 z/Linux z/VM guests
accessing a DB2/UDB V8.2 database running on a separate z/Linux guest.
On occasion, the DB2 work will slow to a crawl for several minutes and a
top command run on the DB2 guest shows most of the available CPU
resource is
You have 8 virtual cpus assigned to DB2 with sles8? I don't think the
2.4 kernel scales well enough to make that super efficient. Have you
tried it was say 2? How big is your db2 virtual machine? Did you set
the kernel setting as recommended in the db2 install? Is it swapping
at all?
On 1/12/06, Stephen Frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some time ago we had a long discussion about return codes from HCP or VMCP.
They
are different. HCP behaves almost like a CMS programer would expect. VMCP
behaves more like a UNIX programer would expect. You get to choose. If you
don't
29 matches
Mail list logo
