Hi List,
I have been task to implement the NFS and I have it in one of our test
box. It's currently up and running both the server and the client and
now I'm stacked in going forward. I know what NFS does but I'm
struggling to logon to it. Do I need a separate client installed in my
workstation
Hi List,
I have been task to implement the NFS and I have it in one of our test
box. It's currently up and running both the server and the client and
now I'm stacked in going forward. I know what NFS does but I'm
struggling to logon to it. Do I need a separate client installed in my
workstation
Sibeko, Sipho S wrote:
Hi List,
I have been task to implement the NFS and I have it in one of our test
box. It's currently up and running both the server and the client and
now I'm stacked in going forward. I know what NFS does but I'm
struggling to logon to it. Do I need a separate client
I know what NFS does but I'm
struggling to logon to it.
You don't logon to it. You specify what filesystems you want to be
visible to clients on the server side (called exporting the filesystems,
controlled by /etc/exports or the equivalent on your OS), and on the
client side, you use 'mount'
Hi Sipho,
Not sure what you are trying to accomplish, but assuming you want to run an NFS
server under zOS and access the HFS filesystem from a Linux client running as a
zVM guest, you will need the mvslogin RPM package so you can authenticate
against RACF. In our shop we have be using this
At 04:03 AM 6/21/2006, Mark Perry wrote:
If your Workstations are running Windoze, then
without 3rd party software you are out of luck.
Windoze by default only supports SMB/CIFS which zLinux can serve using SAMBA.
So either purchase () NFS Clients for
windows, use Linux on your
On Wednesday, 06/21/2006 at 11:03 ZE2, Mark Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
If you pursue the NFS solution then please understand that one does not
logon to it, one issues a mount and that does not require any
password (exception is z/OS NFS Server using SAF, in which case yes
there is an
Due to size restrictions that will soon be placed on email attachments, we are
looking for a secure FTP server that runs on zLInux that will allow us to
exchange large files. The product should not require the outside user to
have a product client.
We have looked at and like the features of
Eric Chevalier wrote:
Actually, that's not completely true; there's at least one free NFS
client for Windows: Microsoft's Services For Unix (SFU) package:
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/interopmigration/unix/sfu/default.mspx
This free download for Windows 2000/XP includes both an NFS client
On Wednesday 21 June 2006 10:23, Charlie Crochet wrote:
Due to size restrictions that will soon be placed on email attachments, we
are looking for a secure FTP server that runs on zLInux that will allow us
to exchange large files. The product should not require the outside user
to have a
Charlie Crochet wrote:
Due to size restrictions that will soon be placed on email attachments, we are looking for a secure
FTP server that runs on zLInux that will allow us to exchange large files. The product
should not require the outside user to have a product client.
Have you considered
Charlie:
I've enclosed a link to some technical info on XCOM which will run in a
LINUX environment (and others). We DO require a 'agent' on the SENDING
and RECEIVING side to provide 'guaranteed delivery', which we can't
provide unless we have the agents on 'each side'. If guaranteed delivery
Hi,
please note that you cannot chroot users to a specific directory when using
SFTP. It could be a security issue depending of the level of trust of your
end users. Every user of the SFTP service could access to the whole system
if not properly implemented.
You can just give access to the
We run z/VM 5.2 and Suse Sles 9 SP3. Comments on what other sites are
using would be greatly appreciated.
Use VSFTPD, which is included with SLES.
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send
That looks very promising, anyone had any experience of SFU?
It's pretty stable. Don't expect stellar performance, but it works
reliably.
-db
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
We run z/VM 5.2 and Suse Sles 9 SP3. Comments on what other sites are
using would be greatly appreciated.
VSFTPD here also.
Mark D Pace
Senior Systems Engineer
Mainline Information Systems
1700 Summit Lake Drive
Tallahassee, FL. 32317
Office: 850.219.5184
Fax: 888.221.9862
Has anyone been able to compile the vsftpd product to enable the TLS for
secured logon and transmission of data ?
We would like to use the VSFTPD product if we could get the TLS support
enabled.
We looked at using the Pure-FTP product which also supports the SSL/TLS but
the data transfer itself
On Jun 21, 2006, at 10:57 AM, Terry Spaulding wrote:
Has anyone been able to compile the vsftpd product to enable the
TLS for
secured logon and transmission of data ?
What trouble are you having? I don't remember it being especially
tricky.
Adam
Please note that the vsftpd shipped with SLES9 SP3 does not support SSL/TLS
encryption. This is only available from version 2.0 and newer, according to
the vsftpd documentation. SLES9 SP3 comes with version 1.2.1 of the daemon.
More information on building vsftpd could be found on these links
Sure. Slackware and Slack/390 compile it that way. It just compiles.
As Adam said, what problems have you had?
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Terry Spaulding
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 11:58 AM
To:
You'll need the OpenSSL and OpenSSL development packages.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Terry Spaulding
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 12:30 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Secure FTP Server
I do not have the
That would explain why it did not compile ?
The rpm is 1.2.1. We are on SuSE SLES9 SP3 s390x.
We will look at the newer version.
Thanks ...
-
The team here did download the vsftpd 2.0.4 and tried to compile it.
They thought that maybe the source was for Intel Linux not zSeries Linux.
We will try to compile it again and make sure the OpenSSL packages are on
the
system.
Thanks.
I did some testing with SFU and I won't use it for a production environment...
-Jose
-Original Message-
From: Mark Perry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 10:52 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: NFS on the Mainframe
Eric Chevalier wrote:
Actually,
Ar Mer, 2006-06-21 am 12:48 -0400, ysgrifennodd Terry Spaulding:
The team here did download the vsftpd 2.0.4 and tried to compile it.
They thought that maybe the source was for Intel Linux not zSeries Linux.
Same source 8)
--
On Jun 21, 2006, at 11:29 AM, Terry Spaulding wrote:
I do not have the messages in front of me but when we tried to
compile it
with TLS option it had errors looking for libs.
I will see if we can recompile and capture the errors we received.
Did you specify certain libs or had certain libs
Hi Charlie,
We had basically the same situation; we ended using zOS as our corporate FTP
server. That way we can use RACF to authenticate users and for external users
it looks like just another UNIX server. The zOS FTP server has everything you
need to provide SSL/TLS capabilities.
In our
Vic Cross wrote:
Cheers,
Vic (got to think of a cool name for *my* alter-ego, since Chuckie is
already taken)
Verity. Speaks truth, shortens to Very.
--
Cheers
John
-- spambait
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tourist pics http://portgeographe.environmentaldisasters.cds.merseine.nu/
We have an application running on one of our Unix machines that
consists of Java code making calls to Oracle in the same box. We ran
a benchnmark with a few concurrent jobs and the 6 Unix CPU's were
pegged at 100% for 10+ hours (1.2 GHz CPU's) under AIX.
We also have Linux SuSE under zVM with
Absolutely not. A z890 is slower than a 1.2GHz Power CPU. Two IFLs compared
to 6 Power CPUs is going to be a lot slower. SPARC chips are generally faster
then a z890 as well.
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Yu
Safin
Sent: Wednesday, June
On 6/21/06, Fargusson.Alan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Absolutely not. A z890 is slower than a 1.2GHz Power CPU. Two IFLs compared
to 6 Power CPUs is going to be a lot slower. SPARC chips are generally faster
then a z890 as well.
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port
It looks to me like you are talking about speed. You pegged 6 1.2GHz Power
CPUs for 10+ hours. That is a lot more compute power then you will get from 2
z890 CPUs.
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Yu
Safin
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006
On 6/21/06, Yu Safin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am talking throughput here, not speed.
What would be the difference if your test fully saturates the 6 CPU's
? That would suggest the test is limited by the processing capacity
right now. Less and/or slower CPUs will make it slower. If that's
Fargusson.Alan wrote:
It looks to me like you are talking about speed. You pegged 6 1.2GHz Power
CPUs for 10+ hours. That is a lot more compute power then you will get from 2
z890 CPUs.
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Yu
Safin
Sent:
34 matches
Mail list logo
