Adam Thornton wrote:
On Jul 27, 2006, at 5:54 PM, Dominic Coulombe wrote:
Is there a reason to use SSH without encryption over telnet?
Just wondering.
X11 port forwarding, when you know the environment's reasonably
trustworthy, comes to mind immediately.
you can also forward arbitrary
Post, Mark K wrote:
From what I've seen, a lot of that information is usually kept in the
user's browser via cookies or session cookies. For things that
aren't, mirroring the data on separate physical devices, on separate
controllers, etc., etc., provides the redundancy needed. The whole
point
James Melin wrote:
Greetings everyone. I'm up to strangeness again.
I'm trying to do something where I expose a collection of files in a directory
that are symbolic links via NFS.
The NFS mount works, but the files then try to be symbolic links on the local
file system where I mount the
Mark Perry wrote:
- Start Original Message -
Sent: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 12:35:26 +0200
From: Rob van der Heij [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Bad Linux backups
SNIP
I would hope that anything that prevents the flashcopy
from starting could be reported for
Dominic Coulombe wrote:
Yes, you're right, I posted this a little quick...
What I was thinking was more like :
All of your machines share the same /usr disk, then you take the
master down, clone his /usr disk, apply patches to the new disk and
then do a little testing on the results.
If
Rick Troth wrote:
As an example, the 1B0 disk is bootable and has three partitions:
/boot, /usr, and /opt. (The DASD driver only supports up to three
partitions. The boot disk must be partitioned to save room for the
IPL text in the first track.) The 1B1 disk a copy of MAINT 1B1,
with
Dominic Coulombe wrote:
Is there a reason to use SSH without encryption over telnet?
Just wondering.
The primary reason _I_ use ssh is its simplicity compared with using
telnet. Mostly, I use it over trusted (I control it all) or
already-encrypted channels (VPN).
I often use it's X
On Jul 28, 2006, at 8:46 PM, John Summerfield wrote:
but that's not what you should be editing these days.
See /etc/mail/sendmail.mc
I somehow don't think that putting a thick coat of M4-flavored makeup
on the pig actually makes the pig much more attractive.
Adam
Ar Sad, 2006-07-29 am 14:54 -0700, ysgrifennodd Adam Thornton:
I somehow don't think that putting a thick coat of M4-flavored makeup
on the pig actually makes the pig much more attractive.
Why not ? It works for mustard. It certainly makes it a lot simpler to
generate new configuration files.
Ar Sad, 2006-07-29 am 11:08 +0800, ysgrifennodd John Summerfield:
Aside from users' aversion to cookies, their correct use isn't any
easier than good backups;-) I reckon a lot of application authors trust
the data held cookies, saying we provided that so we know it's okay.
It is possible to
On Jul 29, 2006, at 4:17 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
Ar Sad, 2006-07-29 am 14:54 -0700, ysgrifennodd Adam Thornton:
I somehow don't think that putting a thick coat of M4-flavored makeup
on the pig actually makes the pig much more attractive.
Why not ? It works for mustard. It certainly makes it a
/var should not be shared, as there are a lot of critical files in
there, see /var/lock .
The sharing thing is more complicated that I tought...
On 28-Jul-2006, at 23:19, John Summerfield wrote:
/var might be okay, for example, but I don't know that it's defined to
be so.
On Saturday, 07/29/2006 at 11:28 AST, Dominic Coulombe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
/var should not be shared, as there are a lot of critical files in
there, see /var/lock .
The sharing thing is more complicated that I tought...
Remember our discussion of live backups? Live sharing is another
On Friday, 07/28/2006 at 11:28 AST, Kenneth Libutti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Is there is any benefit to using dedicated DASD vs minidisk with 5.2 on
a z/890
( No IOASSIST available)?
With dedicated dasd, CCW translation is marginally faster. But if memory
serves, you will lose minidisk caching
14 matches
Mail list logo
