This problem occure when we have the load blance to to see if the C:D is
up by probing the port , this is corrected. Now it seems we have user
write API to to talk to C:D and it causing the problem.
Do you guys feels reducing the default 18 for the TCP-TIME-WAIT
BUCKETS POOL SIZE
We start it 'via the shell' at boot time with the init.d runlevel processing.
I can't say as I've had any experience with Webmin but I find it
interesting that there's a problem open on a perhaps similar experience. Much
like our reported problem with tracepath over a hipersocket network
Hello:
If you are interested in participating in an online survey on open
source software and development practices in for-profit corporations,
please email me with your name. The data collected from the survey
will help me fulfill my Master's thesis requirements at NYU. After
receiving your
I'm looking for a way to have REXX Trace output written to a file instead
of being displayed on the terminal. I've tried test.rxx foobar but
the only thing that goes in foobar is the Say instructions and the trace
information is still written to the terminal.
Mark D Pace
Senior Systems
Maybe 2 ?
Mark D Pace wrote:
I'm looking for a way to have REXX Trace output written to a file instead
of being displayed on the terminal. I've tried test.rxx foobar but
the only thing that goes in foobar is the Say instructions and the trace
information is still written to the terminal.
Ah ha! A better formed google search found it.
test.rxx say.txt 2 trace.txt
The 2 sent the trace output to trace.txt
Mark D Pace
Senior Systems Engineer
Mainline Information Systems
1700 Summit Lake Drive
Tallahassee, FL. 32317
Office: 850.219.5184
Fax: 888.221.9862
This problem occure when we have the load blance to to see if the
C:D is
up by probing the port , this is corrected.
Yes, that would clearly cause it. I don't know of any commercially
available load balancers that understand the C:D protocol well enough to
do a layer 4 transaction to
Hi List,
I am considering creating a z/VM 5.2 system for a project. The project
requires a z/OS SYSPLEX with DB2 Data Sharing, and various Linux Guests
(Suse/Redhat)
All of this will be bleeding edge, so consider z/OS 1.8 going to 1.9
CB02 later. DB2 will be V8 and V9. Linux Guests will be
I've written a rexx program to run under cron to do clean up on a
directory. It runs fine when I run it myself, but it fails under cron.
Trace output from the cron run job shows
sudo ls -lGgh /srv/ftp/pub
-r--r--r-- 1 14M Nov 7 16:02 GE_Mainline_Ansys ver2.ppt
HUH? when I do it manually
I too would be interested in how 5.2 plays in to this and the historical
reasons for NOT to run z/OS under z/VM. But consider a separate LPAR
for the z/OS guests (not necessarily a separate z/VM system).
I have a customer considering a similar scenario. The (and I'm really
growing weary of
This z/VM system will be dedicated to the project, and can be
considered
a TEST environment so performance need not be exceptional, but should
be
sufficient. It could be running on various zSeries hardware (if that
is relevant) z900/990 or z9. All DASD will be on Sharks.
You may need to allow
That's probably because z/OS won't run on IFLs and IFLs and general
processors can't be mixed in the same LPAR.
Marcy Cortes
This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information.
If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the
addressee, you must not use,
On Nov 16, 2006, at 11:07 AM, Mark Perry wrote:
Anyone got any good reasons why I should consider creating 2 z/VM
systems to keep the z/OS and Linux Guests apart?
Because that way you can run your Linux guests on IFLs and save lots
of licensing money on your z/OS software.
Adam
The last I heard, you can't run z/OS on z/VM. Regular VM is OK.
Your
best
bet is to run z/OS in an LPAR by itself, and run z/VM in another LPAR.
??? Who told you that? The black helicopters from Endicott need to
reeducate this individual.
You can't have a virtual machine as a member of a
Indeed, that's certainly a good reason! :)
Marcy Cortes wrote:
That's probably because z/OS won't run on IFLs and IFLs and general
processors can't be mixed in the same LPAR.
Marcy Cortes
This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information.
If you are not the addressee or
On Thursday 16 November 2006 11:29, Mark D Pace wrote:
I've written a rexx program to run under cron to do clean up on a
directory. It runs fine when I run it myself, but it fails under cron.
Trace output from the cron run job shows
sudo ls -lGgh /srv/ftp/pub
-r--r--r-- 1 14M Nov 7 16:02
z/VM 5.2 has lots of goodies that can be leveraged in a z/9 system, so getting
a z/9 if possible is good.
As others have said, a mix IFL and traditonal CP's for a number of reasons are
a good thing. Give your z/OS systems all the CPU they need, but not
more than they need, and give your
Marcy Cortes wrote:
That's probably because z/OS won't run on IFLs and IFLs and general
processors can't be mixed in the same LPAR.
Marcy Cortes
Not an issue Marcy ;-)
Mark
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive
Adam Thornton wrote:
On Nov 16, 2006, at 11:07 AM, Mark Perry wrote:
Anyone got any good reasons why I should consider creating 2 z/VM
systems to keep the z/OS and Linux Guests apart?
Because that way you can run your Linux guests on IFLs and save lots
of licensing money on your z/OS
David Boyes wrote:
The last I heard, you can't run z/OS on z/VM. Regular VM is OK.
Your
best
bet is to run z/OS in an LPAR by itself, and run z/VM in another LPAR.
??? Who told you that? The black helicopters from Endicott need to
reeducate this individual.
You can't have a virtual
On Nov 16, 2006, at 12:26 PM, Mark Perry wrote:
Cost not an issue :-)
There's something you don't hear too often.
Adam
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
Cost not an issue :-)
mark
Can I come work there? ;
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
I can't reproduce this, but my guess is that some ls option is being set in
/etc/profile. The cron jobs don't source /etc/profile. You could source
/etc/profile in your cron job with . /etc/profile and see if that makes it
work.
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port
Adam Thornton wrote:
On Nov 16, 2006, at 12:26 PM, Mark Perry wrote:
Cost not an issue :-)
There's something you don't hear too often.
Adam
Well obviously every cent has to be justified (bean counters get
everywhere), but its not the limiting factor here - getting
(pre-approved) projects
On Thursday 16 November 2006 12:48, Mark D Pace wrote:
I get the same results using ls or /bin/ls
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ /bin/ls -l
total 41420
drwxr-xr-x 2 marpace users 4096 2006-11-16 09:30 bin
This is too wierd! I can't get that -MM-DD format out of my ls at all.
Does anybody else get
Hi,
Earlier posts to this list made reference to some work being done on
Opensolaris on System z. I've been experimenting with this for several
months now. There's about 150,000 lines of new or changed code involved.
I thought it'd be useful/interesting to summarize where I'm at.
Below is the
On Thursday, 11/16/2006 at 06:29 CET, Mark Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The only issue, is whether running Linux in the same z/VM as z/OS is a
good idea or not.
Where is cost is not an issue, running Linux and z/OS in the same z/VM
LPAR (standard engines only) is a fine idea. Works great!
Curiousity question. Why bother? What does OpenSolaris have that is
needed? Why not one of the BSDs as well / instead?
--
John McKown
Senior Systems Programmer
HealthMarkets
Keeping the Promise of Affordable Coverage
Administrative Services Group
Information Technology
This message (including
James Melin wrote:
z/VM 5.2 has lots of goodies that can be leveraged in a z/9 system, so getting
a z/9 if possible is good.
Yes a z9 was my request! But unless I can justify it for a TEST project,
other projects may force me onto older hardware.
As others have said, a mix IFL and traditonal
McKown, John wrote:
Curiousity question. Why bother? What does OpenSolaris have that is
needed? Why not one of the BSDs as well / instead?
ZFS
Mark
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send
ls -al --time-style=long-iso
Gives you the -mm-dd
Valid arguments are:
- `full-iso'
- `long-iso'
- `iso'
- `locale'
So, must be related to locale setting?
Marcy Cortes
This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information.
If you are not the addressee or
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Marcy Cortes
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 12:57 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: cron oddity?
ls -al --time-style=long-iso
Gives you the -mm-dd
Valid arguments are:
I thought people we working to Make ZFS available for Linux.
Also - I know the initial work to get ZFS into FreeBSD is well
under-way - the initial patches have recently become available.
Wouldn't it be easier to port the file system to Linux than
to port the OS to z-arch?
- Dave Rivers
I can't reproduce this, but my guess is that some ls option is being set
in /etc/profile. The cron jobs don't source /etc/profile. You could
source /etc/profile in your cron job with . /etc/profile and see if that
makes it work.
I added
address system '. /etc/profile'
to my rexx program. No
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mark Perry
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 12:52 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: OpenSolaris
McKown, John wrote:
Curiousity question. Why bother? What does OpenSolaris have that is
Or an alias?
Marcy Cortes wrote:
ls -al --time-style=long-iso
Gives you the -mm-dd
Valid arguments are:
- `full-iso'
- `long-iso'
- `iso'
- `locale'
So, must be related to locale setting?
Marcy Cortes
This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information.
If you
Now you tell him... :)
Thomas David Rivers wrote:
Wouldn't it be easier to port the file system to Linux than
to port the OS to z-arch?
- Dave Rivers -
--
Rich Smrcina
VM Assist, Inc.
Phone: 414-491-6001
Ans Service: 360-715-2467
rich.smrcina at vmassist.com
Catch the WAVV!
Right. I was thinking he had it the other way around with the cron one
acting unexpectedly.
But, anyway, Mark can solve his prob with the --time-style option :)
Looks like the aliases already set up in the default shell are in var
$LS_OPTIONS. These seem to be as shipped in SuSE:
[EMAIL
Hi Julie: let me know where the URL is -
David
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port on behalf of Julie Tan
Sent: Thu 11/16/2006 1:45 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Participants needed for online survey on open source software
Hello:
If you are interested in
I don't know rexx, but I would guess that address system creates a new shell
environment that will not change the rexx environment. The sourcing of
/etc/profile would need to be in the crontab file at a point before you invoke
the rexx script. Probably something like .
On Thursday 16 November 2006 13:56, Marcy Cortes wrote:
ls -al --time-style=long-iso
Gives you the -mm-dd
Doh! I missed that option. So the fix would be to
use -l --time-style=long-iso in your cron script to force it to use the
format you want.
- MacK.
-
Edmund R. MacKenty
Recently, I had a power supply failure on the machine that, among other
things, hosts hercules-390.org. That got me to thinking. (Dangerous, I
know.)
For various reasons, I greatly prefer to run my Internet-facing box on
something other than x86 or AMD64. Currently, I use an Alpha, but those are
I don't think that would have been possible, given the differences in
licensing. If Sun follows through on some comments they've made in the
last few days and adds GPL to the list of licenses for Solaris, then I'm
sure someone will make the effort to create a Linux version of it.
Mark Post
There is an active project to port zfs underway. I was reading about it
on the Sun blog site.
On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 15:03 -0500, Post, Mark K wrote:
I don't think that would have been possible, given the differences in
licensing. If Sun follows through on some comments they've made in the
On Nov 16, 2006, at 2:46 PM, Jay Maynard wrote:
I'm idly pondering trying to scare up a Multiprise 3000
somewhere, but will that be beefy enough?
You'd get about 100 MIPS per engine from one. So, yeah, very
probably. They're pretty beefy boxes.
Alternatively, if I eat my own
dogfood and
Thanks, Marcy, I think adding the --time-style=long-iso is the way to go.
Now I'm having some issues even getting cron to run the code. I've
probably messed up something from changing my crontab constantly.
Mark D Pace
Senior Systems Engineer
Mainline Information Systems
1700 Summit Lake
I got it to work by adding --time-style=long-iso to the ls command in the
rexx code.
I'm going to have to rethink how I design the code, so that my development
environment matches the cron environment.
Thanks, everyone, for the help.
Mark D Pace
Senior Systems Engineer
Mainline Information
Curiousity question. Why bother? What does OpenSolaris have that is
needed? Why not one of the BSDs as well / instead?
Because there's a lot of operations and institutional knowledge about
Solaris in a lot of different places, and while Linux and the *BSDs are
low cost/freely acquirable, skills
There's also a ton of vendor sw (systems management and other) on
Solaris. If that doesn't get ported as well, doubtful that any large
corp where solaris has been for years would be able to get much use out
of it. It's still an evolving story with z/Linux.
That's my 2 cents.
Marcy Cortes
Good point. Solaris on x86 has a loyal following, but it is a small group of
followers.
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Marcy Cortes
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 1:41 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: OpenSolaris
There's
Ls -l --time-style long-iso produces your original output, but I don't
know how you're getting it set. Do you have something odd in your locale
settings?
Remember that cron does not run in your login shell, net even in a
standard system login shell. None of your environment variables get set,
There's also a ton of vendor sw (systems management and other) on
Solaris. If that doesn't get ported as well, doubtful that any large
corp where solaris has been for years would be able to get much use
out
of it. It's still an evolving story with z/Linux.
All true. But, the first argument
On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 03:19:14PM -0500, Adam Thornton wrote:
Note that Debian is currently 31-bit, not 64-bit (that is, s390, but not
zSeries--there is, however, an amd64 port),
Not to mention an Alpha port, as well. I'm more than a little surprised it
hasn't been built for s390x, although I
On Nov 16, 2006, at 5:19 PM, Jay Maynard wrote:
On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 03:19:14PM -0500, Adam Thornton wrote:
Note that Debian is currently 31-bit, not 64-bit (that is, s390,
but not
zSeries--there is, however, an amd64 port),
Not to mention an Alpha port, as well. I'm more than a little
Hello!
Jay? For Intel X86 not the 64-bit stuff, why not Slackware? Its quite
easy to install, and even easier to use. In fact I am typing this
message into my Google Mail account window using KDE on what was the
current before 11.0.
I should also add that I'd be more then willing to contribute
On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 18:29:01 +0100 Mark Perry said:
David Boyes wrote:
The last I heard, you can't run z/OS on z/VM. Regular VM is OK.
Your
best
bet is to run z/OS in an LPAR by itself, and run z/VM in another LPAR.
??? Who told you that? The black helicopters from Endicott need to
Indeed, it was the OS/2 server.
We installed a laptop with Redhat linux, created an ftp server, and it
worked.
The live cd's where no sollution, they do not include an ftp server.
Kind Regards,
Karel Gentens
KBC Groep NV
VM - Systemen (CCM1 - CMI)
Egide Walschaertstraat 3, 2800 Mechelen
[EMAIL
57 matches
Mail list logo
