Mark Perry wrote:
Can anyone from RedHat comment as to why their webpage:
http://www.redhat.com/rhel/compare/
Shows System z has having a maximum amount of memory of 64GB?
A z10 can have 1.5 TB, and I have heard of Linux tests above 512GB.
I note that one point is the RHEL 5.2 announcement
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 6:20 AM, John Summerfield
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I created a self-signed certificate for example.com, it would not be
to provide my identity to the public at large, but for use within a
small group. Not everyone needs _that_ level of security.
Sure, context. If
Rob van der Heij wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 6:20 AM, John Summerfield
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I created a self-signed certificate for example.com, it would not be
to provide my identity to the public at large, but for use within a
small group. Not everyone needs _that_ level of
I find it interesting to see how online identification is done.
Already seen a few cases where access to a bank account (to read some
digits of the account statement) or a mobile phone were used as
components in the process.
Yeah. In Dresden, I was talking to some people who work for a
Rob van der Heij wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 6:20 AM, John Summerfield
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I created a self-signed certificate for example.com, it would
not be
to provide my identity to the public at large, but for use within a
small group. Not everyone needs _that_ level
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 3:24 PM, David Boyes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I suspect its success depends on the near universal penetration
of mobile phones in Finland.
Right. When you visit Finland for vacation, make sure to go to the
restrooms before you leave home.
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
John Summerfield
Sent: Friday, May 23, 2008 8:13 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: SSL CERTIFICATE
Rob van der Heij wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 6:20 AM, John Summerfield
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can point your browser to the 'Z' all day I don't care there are no web
server to answer your call.
How about the web server on your HMC? I hope that is protected somehow
Best regards,
Pieter Harder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel +31-73-6837133 / +31-6-47272537
Brabant Water N.V.
Postbus
On Friday, 05/23/2008 at 08:24 EDT, Rob van der Heij [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Sure, context. If you sit in the broom closet and just show your
hand-written driver license to yourself to practice the movements or
rituals, sure... Useful when you want to learn things or do
experiments.
I
Not even enabled.
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Pieter Harder
Sent: Friday, May 23, 2008 9:02 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: SSL CERTIFICATE
You can point your browser to the 'Z' all day I don't care there are no web
You can delete the MAINT 500 files without harm. the MAINT 500 is just
work space to hold the service files.
This e-mail, including any attachments, may be confidential, privileged or
otherwise legally protected. It is intended only for
http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/05/finlands-roadside-toilets-now-
accessible-only-by-sms/
On the other hand, as government sponsored programs go, that's actually
not a half-bad idea...beats having to look for change.
--
For
Alan Altmark wrote:
On Friday, 05/23/2008 at 08:24 EDT, Rob van der Heij [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Sure, context. If you sit in the broom closet and just show your
hand-written driver license to yourself to practice the movements or
rituals, sure... Useful when you want to learn things or do
If I update /etc/syscongfig/proxy with our proxy server and include NO_PROXY
= localhost, wellsfargo.com , yast2 seems to ignore the no_proxy part and
still attempts to go throught the proxy server to get to the installation
source, which fails. If proxy is turned off in that file, all is well
* sorry about the digital signature thing on the previous one
If I update /etc/syscongfig/proxy with our proxy server and include
NO_PROXY = localhost, wellsfargo.com , yast2 seems to ignore the
no_proxy part and still attempts to go throught the proxy server to get
to the installation
source,
Thanks to everyone that responded to my original hand holding request.
With everyone?s response we were able to install z/VM 5.3 as a second
level guest to our z/VM V5.1. We also applied the latest RSU maintenance
and have performed backups of our 5.3 system.
We are now looking to migrate our
On Fri, 23 May 2008 10:43:33 -0400
David Boyes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/05/finlands-roadside-toilets-now-
accessible-only-by-sms/
On the other hand, as government sponsored programs go, that's actually
not a half-bad idea...beats having to look for change.
David Boyes wrote:
Without further comment: http://www.stupi.se/Time/
In Germany, they might want a different acronym:-)
--
Cheers
John
-- spambait
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Advice
http://webfoot.com/advice/email.top.php
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
David Boyes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/05/finlands-roadside-toilets-now-
accessible-only-by-sms/
On the other hand, as government sponsored programs go, that's
actually
not a half-bad idea...beats having to look for change.
Makes a flat battery really an
Peter,
CMS operating system doesn't have any mechanism to safely share an
ACCESS-ed RW mdisk with another CMS user that has that same mdisk
ACCESS-ed RW; think of it as wiring the same hard drive to 2 windozPC's.
So yes there are serious CMS sharing issues, don't do it.
Can I attach 6815 to my
So far your approach is good. See some comments below.
Peter E. Abresch Jr. - at Pepco wrote:
Thanks to everyone that responded to my original hand holding request.
With everyone?s response we were able to install z/VM 5.3 as a second
level guest to our z/VM V5.1. We also applied the latest RSU
This sounds intriguing. What do you mean about link to a full pack mini
disk? Take the following statement from my directory entry for example:
MDISK 0191 3390 11 5 VMUSR0 MR
Currently, VMUSR0 looks like the following under the first level z/VM
v5.1:
CP Q SYSTEM 6815
DASD 6815 ATTACHED SYSTEM
On Fri, 2008-05-23 at 16:52 +0700, Mark Perry wrote:
Mark Perry wrote:
Can anyone from RedHat comment as to why their webpage:
http://www.redhat.com/rhel/compare/
Shows System z has having a maximum amount of memory of 64GB?
A z10 can have 1.5 TB, and I have heard of Linux tests above
In the directory for VMTESTSV put the statement:
MDISK 6815 3390 0 END VMUSRO MW
Or put that in some other user and put a link to it in VMTESTSV.
Peter E. Abresch Jr. - at Pepco wrote:
This sounds intriguing. What do you mean about link to a full pack mini
disk? Take the following statement
So, it seems as if the functions that depend on utmp.h and utmpx.h
*should* run in 31-bit mode, even on a 64-bit host.
They don't.
I'm going to post the test code I've got with utmpx.h, which is the
more modern interface (I have a suspicion utmp.h really *IS* utmpx.h
under the hood anyway).
To search the archive of this list I go to
http://www2.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?linux-390 and fill in the boxes at
the bottom:
Enter a single keyword that can occur anywhere in item (Currently
limited to items since 1 Jan 1998 )
--
Since 210100
Does anyone have any
Adam,
I saw an example with problems where a 31-bit sshd2 application was being
run on a SLES9 64 bit system. Accessing a utmp entry for a db2fmcd entry
caused a SIGSEGV due to an invalid timestamp in the utmp file. We noticed
that the 1st 6 utmp entries, written by init, are 400 bytes in
Alan,
Try searching here http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-390@vm.marist.edu/
instead.
Seems to work better for me (and faster).
Marcy
This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If
you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the
addressee, you must not
28 matches
Mail list logo
