Hi Donald,
few remarks about ts-shell command history:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 01:16:35PM -0700, Donald Russell wrote:
I miss the command history... it's OK (even desirable) to have that kept for
the current ts-shell session only. (Similar to how terminal works)
ts-shell supports basic
Hi Donald,
thanks for your suggestions!
Let me start to discuss the pager first:
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 09:38:54AM -0700, Donald Russell wrote:
First, let me say I think this whole terminal server thing is
fantastic. I would like to offer some suggestions...
Thanks!
2c -
add an option in
Interesting article, to me. Might be nice to have a single executable that runs
on Intel/32 Intel/64, z/31, z/64, and p. Apparently the data only portion
would not be duplicated, only the executable code portion. Not likely to
happen, but interesting (again, at least to me).
Agreed - very interesting... though to me, mostly as a distribution vehicle
-- whatever does the install of the binaries would hopefully extract out
the 'other platform' portions before laying down the code on 'this platform'
-- that could be part of the install rpm, perhaps (elf extract). I
Data Segment being the same? No, I don't see it happening *that*
well. The BSS segment, no problem, but static data?
Anyone remember the nUxi problem?
Yes, I am referring to byte sex or endianness.
Intel is small endian and pSeries/zSeries is large endian. This
affects how data is laid down
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 11:33, John Campbell soup...@gmail.com wrote:
I *think* the Universal binaries for Mac OS X between the PowerPC
and x86 architectures have two copies of the code [...]
Correct.
Quoting wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_binary) :
Universal binaries
Hi List,
Can I turn off irq_balancer service ? Seems like it is a x86 thing ?
Along the same lines, what other services can/should I turn off ?
The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the
personal and confidential use of the
