Would this readout make better sense?
$ zhypinfo
NoLayer TypeName IFL CP
--
2.2 z/VM_Guest guest myguest2 0
2.1 z/VM_Resource_Pool poolpooltest
I'd say have multiple guests. Let's NOT forget SPOF. (Well, you have a
SPOF if it's in only one z/VM LPAR but at least you have multiple guests
that can be serviced at different times.)
I usually like a number of small guests over a single large guest.
Especially when there are multiple
Hello,
I also thought that enabling SMT will degrade performance of a single
threaded process, but I could not find anyone to confirm that. Thank you
Christian.
Alan:
Postgres is not constrained by having only 4 cores. It's running fine with
1 vCPU. The problem is with overall Openshift Cluster
On 2020-07-18 20:58, Mark Post wrote:
> On 7/17/20 12:18 PM, Marcy Cortes wrote:
>> Late to the game, but I would probably make a .service file that did
>> something like
>>
>> ExecStart= echo $(/sbin/vmcp q userid | awk '{print $3}') > /etc/vmsysname
>>
>> and then anything could look at the
On 02.08.20 06:36, Alan Altmark wrote:
>
> A physical core has a certain amount of “horsepower” in it. It can, at top
> speed do X amount of work.
>
> In SMT, you split the core in half, creating two execution contexts (CPUs)
> instead of just one. The two CPUs share resources on the physical
