What do you mean by a zSeries and s/390 'subscription' ? Is the subscription the
license to run linux or the support contract?
We run SuSE SLES8 (now Novell). The license and upgrade protection is by number of
IFL engines. You also need
to pay more to get both 31-bit and 64-bit. What RedHat's
I vaguely remember Oracle updating /etc/hosts
I could be wrong
Adam Thornton wrote:
On Fri, 2004-07-09 at 09:35, Seader, Cameron wrote:
Greetings,
Just would like to get some opinions on this from those that have dealt with this
before. I am getting ready introduce a test case scenario
There is currently a HIPER microcode fix for z800 and crypto PC ICA. They are putting
the microcode fix on our system thisi weekend. But our lpar runs VM. Just thought I'd
mention checking for the HIPER.
Wolfe, Gordon W wrote:
Cross-posted to Linux/390 and VM-ESA lists. Sorry for the
Our SLES8 on z800 says 'unknown' processor as well.
And we did replace the initial install kernel.
Gregg C Levine wrote:
Hello from Gregg C Levine
Folks join the club. So does another x86 distribution. Slackware does
as well. It doesn't give more details until after you've replaced the
Does RedHat support SAN (open fcp) on zSeries and crypto card? We also are being
pressured to standardize on RedHat now that we have
some RedHat servers on intel. It doesn't matter than we've been running SuSE a couple
of years.
Cameron, Thomas wrote:
Answers inline, below:
-Original
The directory statement for the linux guest is below:
CRYPTO DOMAIN 3 CSU * KEYENTRY SPECIAL MODIFY APVIRT
Q CRYPTO results in the response:
No CAM or DAC Crypto Facilities are installed
Crypto Adjunct Processor is installed
Ready;
Vic Cross wrote:
On Wed, 26 May 2004, Ann Smith wrote
Haven't read my mail lately-if you are still looking to purchase we ordered through
Software House
International.
Since I've just been through this process let me make things a little more clear (or
maybe more fuzzy).
You need to supply the Novell part number for the zSeries SLES8 when ordering
IBM configured our PCICA card to our VM LPAR that runs linux but we see
the following errors:
600 May 26 08:03:24 hostl1 kernel: z90crypt: Hardware error
601 May 26 08:03:24 hostl1 kernel: z90crypt: Type 82 Message Header:
00821000
602 May 26 08:03:24 hostl1 kernel: z90crypt:
1Gig is not enough. We ran just fine with 1536M (1.5Gig).
Do you have the doc from Oracle with the changes to the kernel parms? Their doc
jumps around a bit.
You can miss the fact that you need more memory and can miss the kernal specs as
well.
Graeme Westerman NFU Mutual Insurance wrote:
For what it's worth the STK devices we were using were VERY old. They dug up the
old dasd for our linux/390 Proof of Concept. Since our POC last year we have
finally migrated to newer hand me downs from the zOS folks. The devices we were on
then are no longer supported by STK though they were some
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ann
Smith
Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2004 7:19 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Z/800 IFL W/O VM using SANS and/or Oracle
For what it's worth the STK devices we were using were VERY old. They dug up
the old dasd for our linux/390 Proof of Concept. Since our POC last year
We also use FileZilla and would like it to work as well.
Lucius, Leland wrote:
I checked out fiezilla. Unfortunately it likes to insert /
when I use
something like userid.tso.cntl as the directory. Perhaps I
can patch the
source.
Are you thinking about updating it? If not,
When we got our last 'new' had me downs the storage guy had the nerve to 'You're
all set. Welcome to the 1980's!'
Marcy Cortes wrote:
We in VM have always gotten the had me downs from the zOS folks.
Are you sure you don't work here in VM?:) Ask me about my tape situation
sometime!
Marcy
http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=15850
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
We have 8 paths to each chpid on the mainframe dasd.
And I/O subsytem.
SAN is network and is fiber.
I had wondered if the paths had helped swing the stats.
Richard Troth wrote:
On Fri, 7 May 2004, Ann Smith wrote:
The performance on the mainframe dasd (STK raid 5, turbo)
was better than
Thank you! I obviously was searching on the wrong keywords.
David Boyes wrote:
FYI: The redbook SG24-6870 found at
http://publib-b.boulder.ibm.com/Redbooks.nsf/RedbookAbstracts/sg246870.h
tml?Open
covers the use of the crypto hardware in Linux in some detail. On the
surface it looks like
since there
would be only 1 version to maintain instead of 2. Are you sure there will still be
a 31-bit version?
Jim Elliott wrote:
From: Ann Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: SLES9
I keep hearing SLES9 will be available pretty soon. Is SLES9
strictly 64-bit or is it another case of 31
I'm confused by your 'host adapter' questions. The SAN is an EMC device.
The STK mainframe dasd is ESCON attached to the z800. 3 LPARS share 3 RVA's.
Now that we are using snapshot we have 6 paths to each chpid. When we were testing
we had 8.
I'm pretty SAN illierate but I can ask the storage
We've been running the EosThinClient from RSD on linux guests, using
Tomcat. It runs great. Accesses softcopy reports in the zOS world just
fine. However, now I need to look into SSL.
I'm having a heck of a time trying to find a later version of Tomcat
that includes the Coyote connectors that I
I entered 'rpm -i tomcat4-4.1.30-2jpp.rpm '. And that seemed to work fine.
I entered 'rpm -ba tomcat4.spec' and get errors about 'command not found'
some of it below:
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.35449: line 1: build-classpath: command not found
++ build-classpath jta
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.35449: line 1:
I keep hearing SLES9 will be available pretty soon.
Is SLES9 strictly 64-bit or is it another case of 31 and 64-bit versions
which you purchase separately?
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send
,
Where did you get that file? Most source RPMs have .src.rpm on the end, not
2jpp.rpm. Tomcat is supposed to be platform independent, so I'm not sure it
needs compiling.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ann
Smith
Sent
For what it's worth Weblogic (6.5) stopped working with SP3 as well. We reported it
to BEA back in February and still keep getting back the 'not certified' response.
Weblogc 6.5 support stops at 2.4.19 kernel. I still haven't gotten an answer for
7.0 and 8.1. SP3 has the new security
Dave,
I'm new to this stuff- but hope this helps.
Sample IOCP(why stop at 5 devices):
CNTLUNIT CUNUMBR=3C01,PATH=(3C),UNIT=OSA
IO1000 IODEVICE ADDRESS=(4000,064),UNITADD=00,CUNUMBR=3C01, X
UNIT=OSA
IO1040 IODEVICE ADDRESS=(4040,016),UNITADD=40,CUNUMBR=3C01,
Our Veritas rep now tells me Veritas support for SLES8 is delayed
another year and another release of Veritas. We had wanted to use the
Netbackup client. But now we're told version 6.0 (previously we were
told 5.0) and not until 2005.
So I guess we need to look at other backup products. Any good
The number (on the back of the binder) is also different .
The SuSE folks are used to these numbers.
The 64-bit version for zSeries is 2111-3INT1.
The 31-bit version of S/390 is 2110-3INT1.
Knutson, Sam wrote:
If you have SLES 8 the Media Kit will say
Linux for zSeries (this is the 64bit
We have run Weblogic 6.1 and 8.1. We had extremely little cpu usage. We used
ESAMON and SMART.
Ken Vance wrote:
Hi,
Has anyone else installed this product, and if so, did it run OK? One of
our developers said he installed this today, and they said it used a huge
amount of our VM cpu. I
http://www.ecommercetimes.com/perl/story/33031.html
More advantages of S390 dasd over SCSI (preceeded by soap box speech):
In a 'political environment' where you are just starting to show non-mainframers what
linux/390 can do, it is just is easier to start with 'we can do what you do' and
introduce the 'why s390 is sometimes better for certain
We installed 64-bit linux from SuSE and installed tomcat from the
s390x.rpm file that came with the distribution (4.0.4-49).
We installed the 64-bit IBM java. Tomcat failed to come up. When we
installed the 32-bit IBM java Tomcat comes up fine.
I guess I learned that just because a package has an
I can hardly believe it! And at Lombardo's no less.
This could be fattening.
Michael Coffin wrote:
Cross-posted on VMESA-L, NEUVM-L and LINUX-390 lists, feel free to
forward as appropriate
Greetings!
I'm happy to announce that the New England Users of VM (NEUVM) local
user group has
Is there still a list somewhere of companies running linux/390 in
production?
willing to talk in public about using Linux/390 in production, but not a
whole lot.
Are your managers interested in companies in your industry, or just
companies in general?
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ann
Smith
Sent
]
Behalf Of Ann
Smith
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 3:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LINUX-390] Companies using linux/390
We have a new manager who needs to be convinced companies really run
linux/390 in production.
He seems to want to know about insurance companies
Interesting development.
: Re: [LINUX-390] Ring Around The Guest Lan
Ann,
I have 8+ SLES7 Linux/390 guests hooked to one Guest LAN on a
test box, and
have not seen anything like that. Sorry.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Ann Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 14
We implemented a Guest Lan on our linux POC machine last week.
We are running 1 linux guest with WBIMB 5.0 (MQSI) , 1 guest with Blaze
persistence mgr and Oracle data base, 1 guest running Blaze and MQ queue
mgr.,
and 3 other Blaze guests. Anyway, when the 4th linux guest attempts to
bring up
-
From: Ann Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 12:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Ring Around The Guest Lan
We implemented a Guest Lan on our linux POC machine last week.
We are running 1 linux guest with WBIMB 5.0 (MQSI) , 1 guest with Blaze
persistence mgr
guests hooked to one Guest LAN on a test box, and
have not seen anything like that. Sorry.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Ann Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 12:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Ring Around The Guest Lan
We implemented a Guest
We don't have the apar that recently closed regarding this applied.
Marcy Cortes wrote:
Could you have a performance/tuning problem? Are guests going into the
eligible list?
Marcy Cortes
Wells Fargo Services Company
-Original Message-
From: Ann Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
We have the new MQSI (WBIMB) 5.3 installed under LINUX/390 (SLES8).
The applications here are very dependent on the MQGet plug-in.
IA09 MQSeries Integrator MQGet Plug-in supportpac?
I have not been able to locate the package for linux.
Is anyone using MQGet with linux?
Thank you! It's working!
We had to do 2 things: We changed the LUN address. And the SAN guys had to use
their GUI to grant access.
Ferguson, Neale wrote:
The LUN is a 16 byte no. but usually you're only interested in the first
four. So when we were told the LUN was 01 I initially did
We are attempting have LINUX/390 use an EMC SAN.
scsiload puts out a message about an 'unknown partition table'
Are other folks using EMC SYMMETRIC successfully? Is there doc anywhere
on
how to configure the EMC SAN for LINUX/390?
Sep 16 09:05:24 linuxl1 kernel: scsi : 0 hosts left.
Sep 16
Yes, we are using SLES8.
I just had Ed re-issue the fdisk /dev/sda and he was answering the prompts
as he had before. I was going to send you the messages fronm the console
but this time the linux guest appears to maybe have gone into a loop. But
we don't see any I/O being done. This is new.
Let's try this again. We rebooted and here's what happens with fdisk:
/etc/init.d) Ready(0)# fdisk /dev/sda
Device contains neither a valid DOS partition table, nor Sun, SGI or OSF
disklabel
Building a new DOS disklabel. Changes will remain in memory only,
until you decide to write them. After
We built our own. We actually have been using the doc you kindly provided
I think it's dated Aug. 2002.
We run a shared kernel in an NSS also.
We had to build our own kernel for that as well as adding options needed for
fcp.
We are a little shy of service pack 2. We are are using kernel level
Yes. We did.
Ferguson, Neale wrote:
Did you specify CONFIG_MSDOS_PARTITION=y in the kernel configuration? (File
Systems-Partition Types-MSDOS)
-Original Message-
We built our own. We actually have been using the doc you kindly provided
I think it's dated Aug. 2002.
We run a shared
lsmod:
(/root) Ready(0)# lsmod
Module Size Used byTainted: P
nfsd 76000 4 (autoclean)
st 28152 0 (unused)
sd_mod 14260 0 (unused)
zfcp 253732 0 (unused)
scsi_mod 88876 3 [st
We did rebuild the kernel and double checked options on our side.
We also booted from disk rather than using the shared NSS but same results.
We want to talk to the EMC SAN folks here. There are messages regarding
write protection in /var/log/messages:
ep 16 13:39:47 linuxl1 kernel: zfcp: FSF:
Do post back if it works. We're doing the same thing.
Hall, Ken (IDS ECCS) wrote:
That's exactly what I'm trying to get clarified now. They've given me LUNs of
561-563, but I think that means 0x0561.
If I get it working, I'll post more details.
-Original Message-
Our MQ support folks have been involved with our linux POC. They were
looking for QPASA for linux/390. MQSoftware vendor apparently doesn't
have a version for S390. They said they didn't know that there would be
much demand for it though they didn't say they never would. Does anyone
else have a
http://yro.slashdot.org/yro/03/09/09/123246.shtml?tid=187tid=88
Any HOWTOS for LVM?
Our Oracle folks needed more dasd than a 3390-9 so we started doing LVM.
It's not so easy to move filesystems between guests with LVM or clone
filesystems.
Need some howtos with the LVM VG... utilities.
Mark,
Do you really need/want one huge root partition? It might be
We have United Linux version 1 and have /usr on its own 3390-3.
Since we just started testing MQ and Oracle we started using LVM but it
seems cumbersome. Before it was easy to move filesystems between guests.
umount from one system, CP LINK, mount on the other
LVM isn't so simple. Is there good
We recently moved a java app and some MQ clients and servers to
linux/390 for testing. Folks here are used to Solaris and are confused
by the number of processes that show up when you issue 'ps -ef'. Many
more than they are used to. If you ask Jeeves, there is info on the
threading model linux
Don't know where they get their estimate. Is that OT perpetual license?
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/31938.html
We will be installing Oracle under SLES8. The Oracle folks brought over
doc saying we need to :
1. install compat-2002.8.15-20.s390.rpm from the base CD and
2. install gcc_old.rpm from the Service Pack 2 of SuSE
Number 1. should be doable. The rpm file is on our base CD.
However, we don't have a
may not need, but you need to talk to Oracle support about
this.
Also, SP2 is downloadable from SuSE's website if you have a support
contract.
-Original Message-
From: Ann Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 1:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Oracle
Message-
From: Ann Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 2:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Oracle install - where's gcc_old.rpm?
We do have a support contract. But I couldn't find SP2 for
SLES8 for S/390.
Which website are you referring to?
Little
The option to buy stock is interesting.
http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1104_2-1024633.html
SCO saga continues...
http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=9952
We're no experts but we basically use the same minidisk addresses for the
various linux guests. We also tend to put application products in their own
filesystem on a separate VM minidisk. So our linux guests have basically the
same minidisks for the SuSE linux filesystems. We didn't have a problem
YOU was broken at couple kernel levels. The latest kernel is good -
2.4.19-70.
I know 2.4.19-63 had problems.
We had to go back to the original source kernel off the SuSE United Linux 1
CD's so that we could use YOU to get the latest source kernel (I think
2.4.19-43). We had ordered SLES 7 and
I posted a couple of issues lately (invalid IP address messages and
inability to ftp to class A or class C addresses). The problems were
introduced by a recent SLES8 kernel upgrade. We backed off
kernel-source-2.4.19.SuSE-43.
We decided to try to let a linux SLES8 guest share the OSA adapter with
VM using QDIO. We thought things were fine, then discovered we can't ftp
out to class A or Class C addresses. Class B are fine. Now we find we've
been the cause of the other servers at the company getting flooded with
We changed our SLES8 guest to now share the OSA with VM. We previously
were using VM PROXY ARP. We now find that we can't get out to certain
addresses (not class B- low range or high range), for example we can't
get to SDB.SUSE.DE. I searched the Suse database and found info about
ECN. But
ECN
Message-
From: Ann Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 7:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Tomcat is working
Figured I'd post our solution since I found the clue to the solution by
searching this listserv's archives. CLASSPATH was set to =
CLASSPATH =
/opt
Did you try using SMBPASSWD to set your password to match your windows
password? There is also an option to tell samba whether or not to use the
smb passwords. Check smb.conf, I have no memory.
Noll, Ralph wrote:
nope did not compile samba.. it came with install
tried root and roots password..
Yes. It looking for sun/tools/javac which does not exist.
If you run with the IBM JDK does it include the tools?
jvand2 wrote:
Do you have your environment var JAVA_HOME set to the path of your
jdk? For example export JAVA_HOME=/opt/IBMJava2-s390-14
On Monday 17 March 2003 15:36, you wrote:
Figured I'd post our solution since I found the clue to the solution by
searching this listserv's archives. CLASSPATH was set to =
CLASSPATH =
/opt/IBMJava2-s390-14/lib/tools.jar:/opt/jakarta/tomcat/common/lib/servlet.jar
Maybe it will help the next person who installs tomcat.
I installed Tomcat version 4. When I start up tomcat is squawks about an
error:
no valid java configuration found in directory /etc/java
But Tomcat does come up.
When I point my browser to http://mylinux:8080 I do see Tomcat
functioning (somewhat) the Servlet examples work fine but the JSP
If they gave you the latest microcode, there are a whole bunch of VM TCPIP fixes
that you should apply-if you are running VM, but it sounds like you may not be.
Anttnio Pires de Castro Jr. wrote:
Rich Smrcina wrote:
You say they changed your card, but the bigger question is: Did they give
I am not up to speed with LINUX/390 myself.
I am actually installing a vendor product under Linux/390 (EOS from RSD). The
pre-reqs include the JDK and a choice of Webshere or Tomcat. Tomcat is free and
Websphere is not. We currently already run EOS under Webshere under USS- to answer
the other
I am just getting ready to install Tomcat also. Once I read the
BUILDING.TXT file it looks like there were quite a few
packages to install.I installed the IBM JDK 1.4 which I hope will be
fine. I got the src.rpm files for ant,servletapi,commons beanutils, etc.
from
www.jpackage.org and
A while ago I posted a problem with SLES8 YaST2 Online Update.
The fix became available from SuSE today. It works!
I am looking for rpm files for Tomcat to run with SLES7. Linuxvm.org did
have a pointer to rpm files. I am not sure what version of Tomcat to
install or what JDK to install. Any suggestions?
SuSE
responds to your question first, before I tell what I had to do. Why?
Because knowing me, I probably took the wrong way around to get it
to work
and am curious what the right way is.
Leland
-Original Message-
From: Ann Smith
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 2/21/03 12:52
Message-
From: Ann Smith
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 2/21/03 12:52 PM
Subject: Getting Online Update to work
We recently installed SLES7 and SLES8. How do you get Online Update to
work from YaST2? With SLES7 we get a list of ftp servers to pick from
but can't get any to connect
Can someone point me at some doc on configuring basic sendmail on Suse
Linux?
I haven't edited a SENDMAIL.CF file since I had OS2 running on my PC
(only about 7 years ago).
At least you could get some! Our company outsourced the surplus equipment
dept. to another company and gave them all our good junk! I don't know where we dug up
the 3270 we're using to test our z800. I was told to ask no questions. Even our
production VM local consoles have squirming or
We are getting a z800 with 8 gig of storage. We will have a regular
engine running VM apps that will use 1 gig central, 1 gig expanded. How
do we divide up the remaining 6 gig for the LPAR that has the IFL engine
dedicated to it? This LPAR is strictly for zVM running LINUX guests. I
tried to
Thanks to those who replied. I ended looking at the Archictecture and
Scalability paper that I found on kintana.com. It looks like Kintana
can use Apache webervers. LINUX/390 can provide these. It looks like it
also uses Oracle databases but I'm hoping for the webservers. My boss
will be back
Anyone running Kintana under Linux/390?
One of my coworkers is having a problem debugging a C program using gdb.
For some reason it seems to skip the instruction following an IF
statement. At first he thought maybe it was a bug in the debugger since
we are still using SUSE 7.0, but he tried debugging the program on a PC
running SUSE
Does anyone have the details on the SUN models and IBM mainframe (z800 or
z900?) Aren't the z800's the most energy efficient?
Jim Elliott wrote:
http://www.computerwoche.de/index.cfm?pageid=254artid=38632
Haven't actually seen this one here. 25 Solarises on an IBM large
system - 40% less
I definitely agree that college level training for LINUX/390 is needed. I've
said it before and may sound like a broken record but IBM has to admit that in
the past the use of VM at universities lead to many developments and
improvements to VM. VM virtual machines seem to be an obvious choice
A question about dividing up storage on a z800 - what to do with that 8
gig.
Do LINUX guests like more expandeed storage or central storage?
Another two cents.
You definitely need RACF. A security package should be a requirement and RACF
can be purchased with engine based charging. I am not sure of what CA is
charging now for VMSECURE.
DIRMAINT is highly recommended- very useful, makes the sysprog's life easier.
Also available with
We recently installed LPRNG and defined network printers to
/etc/printcap.
We have SUSE 2.2.16 kernel, Samba 2.0.7 and LPRNG 3.6.12.
When we use the Windows Add Printer wizard we see all of the printers we
defined in printcap but we also
see a null printer ( | ) at the top of the list of printers
We are just changing from BSD to LPRNG but I was wondering what is the
status of CUPS for S390? I did not see a SUSE s390.rpm for CUPS.
We've defined our current LAN printers to a Linux/390 guest and can
print okay from various apps (Word, Excel, etc.). But I'm having trouble
figuring out how to get duplex print. For example, we have an HP 8000
with duplex capability. I'm trying to make the LINUX printer look just
the same as the
-
From: Ann Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 11:28 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Linux/390 - Duplex print
We've defined our current LAN printers to a Linux/390 guest and can
print okay from various apps (Word, Excel, etc.). But I'm having trouble
figuring out
Alan Altmark posted that z/VM 3 can't run in IFL engines. This is not
good news for us. We are currently running VM on a machine that can't
run z/VM 4. We are looking at getting newer machine with an IFL engine.
We wanted to do a Linux proof of concept on the new machine, on the IFL
to isolate
Keeping both machines could incur additional software and hardware costs.
For now, I just need IBM to verify z/VM 3 really can't run in an IFL.
If it really can't, we'll just have to deal with it.
Rich Smrcina wrote:
Are both machines going to be on the floor together for a while? If so, will
I need a list of some of the companies running LINUX/390. I thought
there used to be one off of linuxvm.org (a survey ?) also IBM used to
have a list. In particular,
I need to know the names of other insurance companies using LINUX/390.
How many years ago was it that SUN first compared mainframes to dinosaurs?
The z800 hase a lot of memory so it is appropriate that they chose the name raptor,
since it was a small, smart dinosaur. Only 3 feet tall? But I thought it was really
'velociraptor'
but I guess you need Velocity
We're still trying to install the prereq's for the JDK 1.3.0. We have
gotten past our initial 'cannot install' package problem. It ended up
the Hummingbird(Exceed) was warping the binary ftp transfer of the rpm
file.
But we still have an issue with determining everything needed for glibc.
rpm
Linux systems. I used the HOD V6
Deployment Wizard on my WinNT to configure the sessions and copied the same
configuration files to both Linux system.
Thanks,
Craig
-Original Message-
From: Ann Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 2:03 PM
Can LINUX/390 2.4.7 kernel run under z/VM 3.1?
Can LINUX 2.4.7 run on a G3 processor?
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
