Re: Decent editor for linux console (3270)?

2005-06-17 Thread Post, Mark K
for linux console (3270)? You can use THE (The Hessling Editor) which is a freeware text editor based on Xedit. I run it on RHES3 with Regina Rexx and it runs fine. You can use profile (as with Xedit) to choose your screen configuration with the same set of command of PROFILE EXEC. There are

Re: NED Question -- Was: Decent editor for linux console (3270)?

2005-06-17 Thread Adam Thornton
On Jun 17, 2005, at 9:46 AM, Lee Stewart wrote: I decided to try NED (for that 3270 capable editor), and must be missing something... I installed it, without visible errors, on my SLES9 system yet even after rebooting I get: leesles9:~ # ned ned is supported only on 3270 terminals leesles9:~

Re: NED Question -- Was: Decent editor for linux console (3270)?

2005-06-17 Thread Richard Pinion
Do you have conmode=3270 in your boot parmfile? If not try adding conmode=3270 to the parmfile, make sure your zipl.conf points to the parmfile, and execute zipl. >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/17/05 10:46AM >>> I decided to try NED (for that 3270 capable editor), and must be missing something... I

NED Question -- Was: Decent editor for linux console (3270)?

2005-06-17 Thread Lee Stewart
I decided to try NED (for that 3270 capable editor), and must be missing something... I installed it, without visible errors, on my SLES9 system yet even after rebooting I get: leesles9:~ # ned ned is supported only on 3270 terminals leesles9:~ # who root ttyS0Jun 17 14:31 This is

Re: Decent editor for linux console (3270)?

2005-06-17 Thread Philippe Septier
You can use THE (The Hessling Editor) which is a freeware text editor based on Xedit. I run it on RHES3 with Regina Rexx and it runs fine. You can use profile (as with Xedit) to choose your screen configuration with the same set of command of PROFILE EXEC. There are commands to have the prefix co

Re: Decent editor for linux console (3270)?

2005-06-08 Thread Wesley Parish
Ouch! My head hurts! ;) (dd and sh - reminds me of the time I was planning on writing a complier in minix's sh, because my evaluation minix floppy didn't have cc. ;) Yes, it would work - but if you want to emulate a more so-fist-ee-kate-ed environment, you could always port edlin from FreeDOS

Re: Decent editor for linux console (3270)?

2005-06-07 Thread Uriel Carrasquilla
uesday, June 07, 2005 12:11 PM To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Decent editor for linux console (3270)? Mark: Unfortunately, /sys/bus/ccw/drivers/3270 is a directory with no files in it. Found /dev/3270 has ttycons, tub and tubcons (as in my previous note). I checked modprobe.conf and

Re: Decent editor for linux console (3270)?

2005-06-07 Thread Post, Mark K
esday, June 07, 2005 12:11 PM To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Decent editor for linux console (3270)? Mark: Unfortunately, /sys/bus/ccw/drivers/3270 is a directory with no files in it. Found /dev/3270 has ttycons, tub and tubcons (as in my previous note). I checked modprobe.con

ned - WAS: Decent editor for linux console (3270)?

2005-06-07 Thread James Melin
I thought the thread discussion was interesting so I I went and grabbed ned because I can see that being a handy thing The build directory referenced in the ned documentation in the command :cd /lib/modules/$(uname -r)/build/Documentation/s390 is a broken symbolic link to /usr/src/linux-{ker

Re: Decent editor for linux console (3270)?

2005-06-07 Thread Ifurung, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Uriel: Let me know if you can get ned to work on suse9; I'm also interested. I downloaded the package from UTS but I keep getting: "ned is supported only on 3270 terminals" when trying this command: ned -T /dev/3270/tub or ned -T /dev/3270/tubcons .. using a login with a 3270 emulator to the g

Re: Decent editor for linux console (3270)?

2005-06-07 Thread Uriel Carrasquilla
EDU e.net> cc: Sent by: Linux onSubject: Re: Decent editor for linux console

Re: Decent editor for linux console (3270)?

2005-06-07 Thread Uriel Carrasquilla
Sent by: Linux on Subject: Re: Decent editor for linux console (3270)? 390 Port

Re: Decent editor for linux console (3270)?

2005-06-07 Thread Post, Mark K
1:06 AM To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Decent editor for linux console (3270)? Mark: Yes, we are tired of having to use the HMC to interact with the HMC. We are looking at another approach using the HMC via an HTTP server under OS2 running in the HMC server. But this approach has c

Re: Decent editor for linux console (3270)?

2005-06-07 Thread Post, Mark K
Not any longer. That was removed quite some time ago. Mark Post -Original Message- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thomas Denier Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 10:45 AM To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Decent editor for linux console (3270

Re: Decent editor for linux console (3270)?

2005-06-07 Thread Uriel Carrasquilla
m> cc: Sent by: Linux on Subject: Re: Decent editor for linux console (3270)?

Re: Decent editor for linux console (3270)?

2005-06-07 Thread David Boyes
> I use the HMC console as a zLinux Master Console and that is where my > special keys problems reside. > If I was to have a true/real/physical 3270 Master Console > attached to the > zLinux LPAR, can I then use NED and issue zLinux commands? You could use NED, but the other concerns do not change

Re: Decent editor for linux console (3270)?

2005-06-07 Thread Adam Thornton
On Jun 7, 2005, at 9:41 AM, Uriel Carrasquilla wrote: As it was pointed out to me, I need to mention that I am running zLinux under LPAR and not zVM. I use the HMC console as a zLinux Master Console and that is where my special keys problems reside. If I was to have a true/real/physical 3270

Re: Decent editor for linux console (3270)?

2005-06-07 Thread Adam Thornton
On Jun 7, 2005, at 9:44 AM, Thomas Denier wrote: Adam Thornton: >>> ned is now freely available, and works wonderfully. If I remember correctly, Ned still requires a network connection to a license manager, even though there is no charge for the license. This tends to make Ned unavail

Re: Decent editor for linux console (3270)?

2005-06-07 Thread Post, Mark K
Yes, you can. See http://linuxvm.org/info/howtos/3270.html Mark Post -Original Message- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Uriel Carrasquilla Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 10:41 AM To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Decent editor for linux console (3270

Re: Decent editor for linux console (3270)?

2005-06-07 Thread Thomas Denier
> Adam Thornton: >>> > ned is now freely available, and works wonderfully. If I remember correctly, Ned still requires a network connection to a license manager, even though there is no charge for the license. This tends to make Ned unavailable in precisely the situations where it would be

Re: Decent editor for linux console (3270)?

2005-06-07 Thread Uriel Carrasquilla
EDU mine.net>cc: Sent by: Linux onSubject: Re: Decent editor for linux console (3270)? 39

Re: Decent editor for linux console (3270)?

2005-06-07 Thread David Boyes
> I think the answer is yes. > This explains why we can't issue "control-c" to get out of > "ping", emacs or > the vi special key combinations. Linux has no native capabilities for dealing with half-duplex block mode terminals as a console. The 3270 console driver the UTS folks wrote provides some

Re: Decent editor for linux console (3270)?

2005-06-07 Thread Adam Thornton
On Jun 7, 2005, at 9:14 AM, Uriel Carrasquilla wrote: Let me ask a silly question instead of providing an answer. When I am using the HMC as my zLinux Master Console, is that what you guys are calling a 3270 Linux Console? I think the answer is yes. No, the HMC is not a 3270. However, you

Re: Decent editor for linux console (3270)?

2005-06-07 Thread Uriel Carrasquilla
EDU m> cc: Sent by: Linux onSubject: Decent editor for linux console

Re: Decent editor for linux console (3270)?

2005-06-07 Thread Uriel Carrasquilla
mine.net>cc: Sent by: Linux on Subject: Re: Decent editor for linux console (3270)?

Re: Decent editor for linux console (3270)?

2005-06-07 Thread Adam Thornton
On Jun 7, 2005, at 8:54 AM, John Campbell wrote: Adam Thornton: >>> ned is now freely available, and works wonderfully. Line mode? There's always ed. I'm not man enough to use ed, myself, so instead I use "sed", "cat", and "echo". << And I thought _I_ was a luddit

Decent editor for linux console (3270)?

2005-06-07 Thread John Campbell
Adam Thornton: >>> ned is now freely available, and works wonderfully. Line mode? There's always ed. I'm not man enough to use ed, myself, so instead I use "sed", "cat", and "echo". << And I thought _I_ was a luddite. Never forget "dd". BTW,. the nice thing about U

Re: Decent editor for linux console (3270)?

2005-06-07 Thread Richard Pinion
NED >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/06/05 08:23PM >>> Sometimes I need to edit files while on the Linux console (when at single user level) under VM. It is a pain to do this. "vi" and other editors use VT220 or some escape codes that the 3270 emulator can not understand. Has anyone found an editor (line

Re: Decent editor for linux console (3270)?

2005-06-06 Thread Adam Thornton
On Jun 6, 2005, at 7:23 PM, Ranga Nathan wrote: Sometimes I need to edit files while on the Linux console (when at single user level) under VM. It is a pain to do this. "vi" and other editors use VT220 or some escape codes that the 3270 emulator can not understand. Has anyone found an editor (li

Re: Decent editor for linux console (3270)?

2005-06-06 Thread Rich Smrcina
Although primitive, ed works just fine, and has pulled me out of quite a few holes. UTS Global has made Ned available. It is an editor for Linux for zSeries (full screen, I think) that understands 3270. Check the archive for the download location. Ranga Nathan wrote: Sometimes I need to edit

Decent editor for linux console (3270)?

2005-06-06 Thread Ranga Nathan
Sometimes I need to edit files while on the Linux console (when at single user level) under VM. It is a pain to do this. "vi" and other editors use VT220 or some escape codes that the 3270 emulator can not understand. Has anyone found an editor (line mode OK) that will work? ___