Re: ovlfs, was: Linux/390 Patches for 2.4.26

2004-06-04 Thread Brandon Darbro
- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brandon Darbro Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 11:15 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ovlfs, was: Linux/390 Patches for 2.4.26 -snip- Once I have it built and working fine against 2.4.21-83, would you like me to post

Re: ovlfs, was: Linux/390 Patches for 2.4.26

2004-06-03 Thread Post, Mark K
- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brandon Darbro Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 11:15 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ovlfs, was: Linux/390 Patches for 2.4.26 -snip- Once I have it built and working fine against 2.4.21-83, would you like me to post the patch

Re: ovlfs, was: Linux/390 Patches for 2.4.26

2004-06-02 Thread Rob van der Heij
Brandon Darbro wrote: Found it, as of kernel 2.4.20, there is a namespace collision, the kernel at that time got it's own list_t definition, and it's quite different from ovlfs's own. I'm currently going through the code and renaming the list_t reference to locallist_t, when I'm done, I suspect

Re: ovlfs, was: Linux/390 Patches for 2.4.26

2004-06-01 Thread Brandon Darbro
/include/linux/list.h:21: previous declaration of `list_t' *Brandon -Original Message- From: Mark Post [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sat, 29 May 2004 16:40:38 -0400 Subject: Re: ovlfs, was: Linux/390 Patches for 2.4.26 Brandon Darbro [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Anyone here have

Re: ovlfs, was: Linux/390 Patches for 2.4.26

2004-06-01 Thread Post, Mark K
in one of them that fixes this problem. Mark Post -Original Message- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brandon Darbro Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 4:37 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ovlfs, was: Linux/390 Patches for 2.4.26 Heya Mark, Did you compile

Re: ovlfs, was: Linux/390 Patches for 2.4.26

2004-06-01 Thread Brandon Darbro
] On Behalf Of Brandon Darbro Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 4:37 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ovlfs, was: Linux/390 Patches for 2.4.26 Heya Mark, Did you compile it against your new 2.4.26 kernel or the 2.4.21-83 kernel? I'm building against 2.4.21-83 and getting: Compiling

Re: Linux/390 Patches for 2.4.26

2004-05-29 Thread Brandon Darbro
Anyone here have the ability to add ovlfs (overlay file system) to the kernel? It would be very handy to have to augment shared DASD... allowing a writable layer to be placed over the read only shared dasd. http://ovlfs.sourceforge.net/ On Friday 28 May 2004 20:19, Post, Mark K wrote: I've

Re: ovlfs, was: Linux/390 Patches for 2.4.26

2004-05-29 Thread Mark Post
Brandon Darbro [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Anyone here have the ability to add ovlfs (overlay file system) to the kernel? It would be very handy to have to augment shared DASD... allowing a writable layer to be placed over the read only shared dasd. http://ovlfs.sourceforge.net/ From what I can

Linux/390 Patches for 2.4.26

2004-05-28 Thread Post, Mark K
I've uploaded Linux/390 source code patches for the 2.4.26 kernel to the linuxvm.org website. This file has the equivalent of all the IBM patches for their 2.4.21 June 2003 stream, plus a couple of patches to fix compilation errors. Most of the work was done by the Debian folks, so thank them