Re: Linux filesystem performance

2008-02-15 Thread Edmund R. MacKenty
On Friday 15 February 2008 16:16, Aria Bamdad wrote: I have a general Linux question that could apply to any platform. From a performance standpoint, would linux perform better if you have two filesystems each with N million files or one file system with N*2 million files on it. This would be

Linux filesystem performance

2008-02-15 Thread Aria Bamdad
Hi, I have a general Linux question that could apply to any platform. From a performance standpoint, would linux perform better if you have two filesystems each with N million files or one file system with N*2 million files on it. This would be purely the way the file systms are maintained by

Re: Linux filesystem performance

2008-02-15 Thread Adam Thornton
On Feb 15, 2008, at 4:48 PM, Edmund R. MacKenty wrote: I don't know the details of how each filesystem works, so I'm probably wrong about this, but I suspect that the reiserfs type of filesystem would do better than ext2, because reiserfs uses a B-tree internally to avoid linear searches through

Re: Linux filesystem performance

2008-02-15 Thread David Boyes
From a performance standpoint, would linux perform better if you have two filesystems each with N million files or one file system with N*2 million files on it. This would be purely the way the file systms are maintained by Linux. Please ignore performance due to different