Re: Power of Open Source - Microsoft Warns SEC of Open-Source Threat

2003-02-06 Thread John Ford
, February 04, 2003 2:46 PM Subject: Re: Power of Open Source - Microsoft Warns SEC of Open-Source Threat The most oft-cited reason given by larger companies with 2,000+ employees for not installing Linux is that the proprietary nature of the software their companies depends upon precludes them

Re: Power of Open Source - Microsoft Warns SEC of Open-Source Threat

2003-02-06 Thread Phil Payne
Phil, I went to the article referred to at the start of this thread (http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,3959,857638,00.asp), and can't find your quote. Is it from something the article links to? No, it's from an analysis by Another Analyst Company That Shall Not Be Named that I turned up doing

Re: Power of Open Source - Microsoft Warns SEC of Open-Source Threat

2003-02-06 Thread Adam Thornton
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 02:42:56PM +0100, Phil Payne wrote: It's much worse. At least one current end user license permits the vendor to use all appropriate means - physical and electronic - to verify that the terms of their license are being complied with. So if they come into your

Re: Power of Open Source - Microsoft Warns SEC of Open-Source Threat

2003-02-06 Thread Wolfe, Gordon W
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Power of Open Source - Microsoft Warns SEC of Open-Source Threat The most oft-cited reason given by larger companies with 2,000+ employees for not installing Linux is that the proprietary nature of the software their companies depends upon precludes

Re: Power of Open Source - Microsoft Warns SEC of Open-Source Threat

2003-02-06 Thread Phil Payne
Is anyone else on this list having the problem of getting multiple copies of posts? I'm getting at least two copies of every post, sometimes as many as six or eight. I've gotten at least six of this particular post. Not multiple posts, but dozens of spurious null posts: Return-path: [EMAIL

Re: Power of Open Source - Microsoft Warns SEC of Open-Source Threat

2003-02-05 Thread John Ford
... -jcf - Original Message - From: Rick Troth [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 6:27 PM Subject: Re: Power of Open Source - Microsoft Warns SEC of Open-Source Threat The most oft-cited reason given by larger companies with 2,000+ employees

Re: Power of Open Source - Microsoft Warns SEC of Open-Source Threat

2003-02-05 Thread Joe Poole
- Microsoft Warns SEC of Open-Source Threat The most oft-cited reason given by larger companies with 2,000+ employees for not installing Linux is that the proprietary nature of the software their companies depends upon precludes them from open-source development. I don't

Re: Power of Open Source - Microsoft Warns SEC of Open-Source Threat

2003-02-05 Thread Daniel Casey
] | | cc: | | Subject: Re: Power of Open Source - Microsoft Warns SEC of Open-Source Threat

Power of Open Source - Microsoft Warns SEC of Open-Source Threat

2003-02-04 Thread Ledbetter, Scott E
If anyone ever doubted the power of OSS, here is a persuasive argument. The article contains some good numbers for anyone fighting to convince management of the viability of Linux. Microsoft Warns SEC of Open-Source Threat http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,3959,857638,00.asp

Re: Power of Open Source - Microsoft Warns SEC of Open-Source Threat

2003-02-04 Thread Rick Troth
The most oft-cited reason given by larger companies with 2,000+ employees for not installing Linux is that the proprietary nature of the software their companies depends upon precludes them from open-source development. I don't understand the foregoing. I don't either. -- RMT

Re: Power of Open Source - Microsoft Warns SEC of Open-Source Threat

2003-02-04 Thread Phil Payne
The most oft-cited reason given by larger companies with 2,000+ employees for not installing Linux is that the proprietary nature of the software their companies depends upon precludes them from open-source development. I don't understand the foregoing. -- Phil Payne