Are you using UUCP? What way did you do the re-install? Did you build
from source, use a preset mc and m4? Or do you have an RPM?
What is the platform SuSE? If this is the case go into Yast and config.
Sendmail to you needs, there is a section under Admin someplace (Yast is
not in front of me)
Looks like 64 bit SuSE is already support, is that GA yet?
http://www-1.ibm.com/servers/eserver/zseries/faq/pdf/mysap_on_linuxforz_faq.pdf?t=gr,l=335,p=mySAP
Regards,
Jon
Jon R. Doyle
Sendmail Inc.
6425 Christie Ave
Emeryville, Ca. 94608
(o_
(o_ (o_ //\
Mark,
I wanted to run multiple Linux/390 LPARs but with tthis problem I ended up giving this
Linux/390 lpar the whole IFL. I also ran the following command to test how long does
it takes to compile sendmail on my Linux/390 Lpar as compared to Intel, the command is
:
time sh Build from Intel
Looks like 64 bit SuSE is already support, is that GA yet?
As posted here a few days back
http://linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2002-03-14-003-26-PR-EL-SS ) beginning of
May.
http://www-1.ibm.com/servers/eserver/zseries/faq/pdf/mysap_on_linuxforz_faq.pdf?t=gr,l=335,p=m
ySAP
Cites
Cancelled
It can be difficult to tell without some sort of instrumentation or analysis
of how Linux is performing. At the first hint of a performance problem, the
typical solution in the Intel world is to throw more or bigger boxes at
it. We don't always have that luxury in the 390 world. Therefore
Running in an LPAR you are somewhat limited in that you can only use Linux
tools and the HMC displays. I do not know what monitoring packages exist for
Linux (besides top), that will give you the information that you (and we)
need to work this out. Of course under VM there are a number of
I thought if I put 'security = server' in my [global] Samba would assume
that the user was authenticated by some other controller lile the
Windows PDC.
I tried mapping the share from this machine and I still got prompted for
an ID and password?
I would like to try this type of security model
At LinuxWorld in January, we announced important new PAM capabilities for
the CA security products (CA-ACF2 and CA-Top Secret). Both products will
include a new built-in PAM server that works in conjunction with an
open-source PAM client to authenticate Linux users directly against
existing
Mark: Thanks for this link.
http://linuxvm.org/info/howtos/movefs.html
Mostly explains things.
I do have a question relating to the tar command therin described: tar
-clpSf - . | (cd /mnt ; tar -xpSf - )
How do you get this process to handle symbolic links.
In my case I was copying the /var
Hi, Moloko.
As others have already pointed out, to see what the problem(s) is/are with
your sendmail Linux
application, we need to have some system data collected. Since your
configuration is Linux running in
an LPAR (without VM, correct?) you are limited to using native Linux
performance data
OK, i have vmware, and a linux guest under vmware. so what do i do
with the .iso files ?? do they get mounted someplace /mnt/tmp/filename.iso
confused and stupid
Acquire FDISK. Partition your hard drive and install a Linux system. You can
the choose to boot either W2K or Linux. Hercules will run on either. Failing
that get VMWare so you can run Linux under W2K or W2K under Linux (but that
would affect Hercules performance).
-Original Message-
Ken, one way would be to mount them via the loopback device:
mount -o loop /myiso.iso
/mnt/directory-where-I-want-to-access-the-files-under-the-iso
I hope you like my mount point name. Carlos
Carlos A. Ordonez
IBM Corporation
Server Consolidation
Mount commands would be good if i had a unix platform, I have win 2000 pro
with Hercules running a guest .
Any of the standard windows cd burners should work with .iso files
For runtime stuff if there is a tool with hercules these days to turn a
filesystem image into a disk image then do that
Mount commands would be good if i had a unix platform, I have win 2000 pro
with Hercules running a guest .
ken
Well, that sounds like a mistake. Well, there's always FIPS on an
x86 Linux Distro to help make room for a _real_ OS on your PC. :-)
Sorry for the cruelty, but
On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 07:05:41AM -0600, Rich Smrcina wrote:
While you are testing sendmail, what does the HMC indicate about the CPU load
if your IFL? Also, does the IFL use dedicated CHPIDs to the DASD? If so,
what is their utilization? As mentioned earlier, try dedicating the IFL to
SUCCESS!!
My OSA Adapter problem is solved and I have just completed my installation.
I want to thank Alan Altmark and Mark Post for their assistance in solving
my problem.
It turned out that my IP address I was using for my Linux virtual machine
did not match the IP
Im doing a redhat 7.2 390 install under win 2000 with hercules...
I keep getting the following disk format messages:
I have done a hercules dasdformat of the files all went fine.
the addresses are 0220 0222
anybody have a clue ?
If you know the address range of your DASDs, please enter it now.
In my case I was copying the /var tree and it left out /var/run/printer
and /var/run/.nscd_socket which are both symbolic links to elsewhere.
You sure they were sym-links and not socket files?
Sym-link should have an l in the far left of 'ls -l' output.
A named socket would have an s in the
As far as looking at the CPU use, you can use the RMF
Partition Data Report running in any other partition
on the CEC to view the CPU utilization of the IPL
partition. Set the RMF interval down on one the other
partitions to 1 minute and collect some data to look
at.
--- Original Message ---
Buy a cd burner and use Nero or Adaptec Easy CD Creator.
Kevin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/20/02 09:51AM
I have grabbed the think blue .ISO files and downloaded them to my
desktop
system.
I have hercules installed on the desktop.
the question is how or what can I do with the .iso images to make
them
I would say just by the sheer amount of work Mark does in order to keep the
rest of us well informed, and the amount that Alan seems to contribute to
the list, that we, the unwashed masses owe them both at this point a near
lifetime supply of beer.
I know mark has saved my sorry behind twice
I just stumbled across this site:
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/linux/;.
It's an IBM Linux Documentation Project site. Here's an overview of what's
available:
Clustering
Standardizing Cluster APIs
- A presentation by Alan Roberts. (Jan 2002)
IBM Linux Clusters
-
On Wed, 20 Mar 2002, Phil Payne wrote:
Looks like 64 bit SuSE is already support, is that GA yet?
Nope.
(Love to know what the delay has been. It was demonstrated at CeBIT _LAST_ year.)
The Distributors. There is no 64 Bit GA Distribution till now.
You need a GA Distribution to run a
Bill,
Using security=server just means that the actual authentication takes
place on the other server. Samba still has to prompt you for the
information it needs to have the authentication performed. If you do have a
PDC already in place, use security=domain instead. This is actually
lighter
Jim,
I've got beer in my fridge. Send _money_!
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: James Melin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 12:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FW: Problem with OSA/2 Adapter
I would say just by the sheer amount of work Mark does
200-220 does not cover 220 222 on the address range. Am I missing
something? I also don't understand the slash in front of the addresses.
Try specifying .220-222
Regards,
Steve Oswald
On Wednesday 20 March 2002 01:23 pm, you wrote:
i GOT IT FROM:
Neale,
It took a while, but I finally figured out that you were talking about
http://www.ibm.com/developer/opensource/linux/pubs/ and not the URL you
gave.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Ferguson, Neale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 1:09 PM
To: [EMAIL
Folks,
We are presently evaluating a package called CA eTrust Access Control, which
provides C2 and some B1 like security controls for resource and object
access authorization. While we have been exploring SELinux, we ware looking
for something that provides centralized security for
One of the additional presentations that I was waiting for arrived today,
and it's been uploaded to linuxvm.org. It was session 5534 by Doctor
Robinson titled Linux z/900 at Salomon Smith Barney. They have Linux/390
in production doing some infrastructure work, with plans to migrate
My URL was the LTC's LDP home page. Your URL is the page with the list of
pubs.
-Original Message-
Neale,
It took a while, but I finally figured out that you were talking about
http://www.ibm.com/developer/opensource/linux/pubs/ and not
the URL you
gave.
Mark,
Couldn't reply to you directly:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SMTP error from remote mailer after RCPT TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
host ah.eds.com [192.85.154.71]: 550 5.7.1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]... Access
denied, sender is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
I
access authorization. While we have been exploring SELinux, we ware looking
for something that provides centralized security for applications hosted on
Linux. Anyone know of any other products we should consider?
RSBAC (www.rsbac.org)
sendmail are set a little low, and S/390 processors are simply not as fast
as Intel for certain tasks, so the load averages are probably going to be
higher on S/390 than Intel. If you've got unused capacity, a load average
The load average includes disk wait blocking so in theory its
I sense your holding something back, tell us what you really think... :)
On Wednesday 20 March 2002 05:45 pm, you wrote:
for most of that. Maybe S/390 just sucks
--
Rich Smrcina
Sytek Services, Inc.
Milwaukee, WI
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Catch the WAVV! Stay for Requirements and
For those interested in such things. This case involved a company basing
some of their own software on GPL code, and then not releasing the source to
the new product immediately. One quote from the article:
Evidently the judge never questioned the GPL license, quoted sections of it
at Progress'
Was there any response to this? Is this available in the 2.2.x distros?
At 01:22 PM 3/19/02 -0500, you wrote:
I just looked at the SHARE presentation Linux and IBM Storage by Tony
Pearson at linuxvm.org web site provided by Mark. Thanks Mark! There are
some visuals on the S/390 compatibility
Mark,
Thanks for the info..
At 01:13 AM 3/21/02 -0500, you wrote:
Steve,
No, it is not available in the 2.2 kernels, only 2.4.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Steve Shomaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 1:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
Greetings; (Posted to VMESA-L and VSE-L and LINUX-390)
- - Now in its fifth year! - - Now includes VSE and linux/390!
I have set up a public service web page at
http://www.eskimo.com/~wix/vm/
for posting positions available and wanted for VM, VSE and linux/390.
Please visit the
40 matches
Mail list logo
