Hello...
I'm trying to port an application from Linux390 to Z/os Open Edition. The program was
written in C and use cc compiler in both Linux and z/os systems to be compiled.
After compilation, I try to execute it but take an abend oc4 with an exeption that
seems to be related to this set of
Hi again,
Can anyone tell me if there is a SuSe 7.x distribution with a 2.4 kernel
available.
My UNIX colleague is struggling to find one.
Thanks again in advance, Eric Lawler.
Eric Lawler,
Infrastructure Support (Platforms),
Barclays Enable,
Ground Floor (A7), Block 10, Radbroke Hall, WA16
We'll probably be looking into this first (ftp to a lpar jes2 internal
reader).
If we ever get VM here, is there a linux - VM - OS/390 method that's
better?
Thanks
~ Daniel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
was hoping to send a message from linux to the other end of it's CTC
channel that our ops
If you go to http://www.linuxvm.org/ you will see a number of links for
distributions. Or go to
http://www.suse.de/us/products/suse_business/sles/sles_s390/download.html
for direct downloads
Phil
Eric Lawler wrote:
Hi again,
Can anyone tell me if there is a SuSe 7.x distribution with a 2.4
Yes there is. You can find it at www.suse.com or www.suse.de
http://www.suse.com/us/press/press_releases/archive02/sles_eval.html
That link should take you to the evaluation copy.
Mark D Pace
Senior Systems Engineer
Mainline Information Systems
1700 Summit Lake Drive
Tallahassee, FL. 32311
Sorry if this is a dumb question, but does this response mean that nobody
is using a Linux 2.4.7 kernel under Z/VM 4.2.0 and exploiting hipersockets
and guest virtual lan.
If so, what is the most upto date Suse distribution and kernel that can be
used with the Z/VM 4.2 hipersockets facilities.
I understand that a z800 OLF is designed to run Linux, and no other guest
operating system. But can you define non-guest CMS users as you could in
any other zVM environment, or is that precluded as well under z800 OLF?
Kelly Ross
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, David Andrews wrote:
On Thu, 2002-04-18 at 05:02, Tim Verhoeven wrote:
So I tested the speed of the Linux partition with bonnie++. I've got a
transfer speed of about 5MB/sec. Thats slower then a 100Mb ethernet link.
What parameters did you feed bonnie?
Here's a
Tim,
Are you using the emulated IO drives? or internal disk storage drive. The
emulated IO drives are really just an OS/2 SCSI PC type drive going thru
alot of software/drivers to emulate a 3380/3390. We don't use them much
because they have poor performance and high usage of them cause our
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 01:03:36PM +0100, Eric Lawler wrote:
Sorry if this is a dumb question, but does this response mean that nobody
is using a Linux 2.4.7 kernel under Z/VM 4.2.0 and exploiting hipersockets
and guest virtual lan.
If so, what is the most upto date Suse distribution and
I'm installing a samba setup on a MP 3000. I've got it up and running ok
now but I still have to convince the NT boys that this is a good idea.
Well, they _want_ to be hard to convince.
But I'm running into a problem. A NT guy did a test. He copied a large dir
to the samba and to a
z/VM works on the 0LF (that's zero LF) just like it does on any other
processor, this includes CMS. The restriction is that you can not IPL
traditional S/390 operating systems under it (OS/390, z/OS, VSE).
On Thursday 18 April 2002 07:24 am, you wrote:
I understand that a z800 OLF is designed
From the #cp q v ctc command:
CP Q V CTC
CTCA 0600 ON DEV FD00 SUBCHANNEL = 000C
CTCA 0601 ON DEV FD01 SUBCHANNEL = 000D
Not sure what the DEV is at this point but it sure doesn't look like they
are coupled to TCPIP...
Mark Dorney
-Original Message-
From: Post, Mark K
What machine was this command issued from? Are there SPECIAL statements
defining these devices to this virtual machine in your directory?
There need to be ctc devices on both ends of the link. At each end, one
device is used for read and the other is used for write. The read device on
one end
We'll probably be looking into this first (ftp to a lpar jes2 internal
reader).
If we ever get VM here, is there a linux - VM - OS/390 method that's
better?
I would not be surprised ... but that's a question someone with a
similar setup would have to answer.
Paul
Mark,
That would be your problem then. You need to have your VM person verify
that TCP/IP is ready to have the CTCs coupled to it, and at what addresses.
Then, from the VM console:
#cp couple 600 tcpip
#cp couple 601 tcpip
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Dorney, Mark
On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, John Summerfield wrote:
Or can I do better on a PC than you can on a mainframe?
John, the reason why large filesystems are challenging on S/390 is
because the disk hardware is still tuned mostly for MVS, which does not
use a fixed-block storage strategy. As a
Then what are the gains - more people doing S/390 build for testing and also
able to look at S/390 specific bugs in general open source code. More
application availability - without Hercules there would be no Mumps for
S/390 for example.
When I was on the Herc list there were smallish
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Do I have to upgrade to 2.4 kernel to run LVM?
You need 2.4 for files larger then 2.1 Gbytes.
--
Cheers
John Summerfield
Microsoft's most solid OS: http://www.geocities.com/rcwoolley/
Note: mail delivered to me is deemed to be intended for me, for my
disposition.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
OK, here we go...
For each of the distro's in
Redhat, SuSE, Turbo, Debian, ThinkBlue/64 (Have I missed any?)
I'd like a single bootable CCKD DASD Image about 1/5th of a CDROM
large. (No need for a swap partition, a single SWAP should be OK)
1. For another project we are investigating if it would be
beneficial to
have a 2.4 kernel under Z/VM 4.2 and VM TCP/IP with
hipersockets and virtual
lan etc. Do current users of these mechanisms find they are
reliable and
perform well ? Or would IUCV be recommended for example ?
Comments
I think this is a first. There's a two-thirds-page advertisement from
Acucorp in
the May 2002 edition of Linux Journal that says:
... Our innovative family of solutions supports Linux running on
IBM's
eServer zSeries and iSeries servers as well as more than 600 other
Chet,
I'm not sure what the problem is, but what you can do is not specify the
HOST= parameter, but instead have iucv=$TCPIP, and let the installer prompt
you for the other values. Or, specify HOST=, but leave the $TCPIP out:
HOST=linimg.marrt.com:iucv0:111.222.6.226::111.222.128.121:1492
and
Hi All.
Who succesfuly applied this patch? I get errors, and it's look like i
missed some patches.
For example:
linux-2.4.7-s390/arch/s390/kernel/smp.c.rej
***
*** 596,602
prof_multiplier[i] = 1;
}
-
John Summerfield wrote:
how many
corporate types here could justify $US2000 a seat for a reasonable set
of licences so as to leave the mainframes for income-earning activities?
How did you come up with the USD2000 a seat number?
Installed rh7.2 via tape in a lpar then logged in via telnet.
RHSETUP
When trying to run rhsetup, we get the following:
Mounting filesystems...
cannot unzip /modules/modules.cgz
cannot unzip /modules/modules.cgz
5000+0 records in
5000+0 records out
mke2fs 1.26 (3-Feb-2002)
Downloading
REQUEST FOR DISCUSSION (RFD)
unmoderated group comp.os.linux.s390
This is a formal Request For Discussion (RFD) for the creation of a
world-wide unmoderated Usenet newsgroup comp.os.linux.s390. This is
not a Call for Votes (CFV); you cannot vote at this
Hey Gang. I was wondering what exactly one can do in a native LPAR
installation of Linux, using the 2.2x kernal (I've not gotten the 2.4
distribution) from SuSE to backup their system.
With 2.2 native, you have limited options. You can attach a tape drive
to the LPAR and use dump manually,
Please disregard for now, they are real CTCs not virtual, I'm thinking I
have to go ESCON not CTC, more like if it were installed in an LPAR instead
of a VM guest researching, thanks to all for the help
-Original Message-
From: Post, Mark K [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
I did them on 2.2.16, it was just a matter of applying the patch to the
kernel source as per the instructions on the ACL site and rebuilding. Seemed
to work fine, never stressed them excessively.
-m
On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 12:31:29PM -0700, Wolfe, Gordon W wrote:
Does anyone know if anyone
You can use the original SLES7 kernel, which is 2.4.7, but you need the qdio and qeth
drivers from Developerworks.
Also, SuSE, in their wisdom, changed the version ID string for the kernel, so you have
to insmod -f the drivers to get them to install.
I haven't tried the updated kernel yet, so
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
above for file-level backups. Amanda is probably the best bet here as
well, along with using DFDSS to do full volume dumps periodically with
the Linux system down for consistency sake.
So DFDSS works fine? When our dasd guy tried it on a linux volume, the
program would
That's pretty much what I thought...you should still be able to use them,
just specify escon0, instead of ctc0.
On Thursday 18 April 2002 09:46 am, you wrote:
Please disregard for now, they are real CTCs not virtual, I'm thinking I
have to go ESCON not CTC, more like if it were installed in an
I'm sadly out of touch with mainframe hardware; it seems strange to me
I can get 120 Gbyte disks for my PC and you folk are using 2.3 Gbyte
drives on your mainframes. I know the theoretical limit is larger than
that, and was back when S/360 was announced.
One advantage to the
DF/DSS should work. You'll probably have to specify ALLEXCP and ALLDATA, or
do a physical dump instead of a logical dump of the volume.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 10:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 07:23:55AM +0800, John Summerfield wrote:
S/390 does also have FBA (fixed block architecture) DASD devices.
Sadly, even in the Linux world these are not widely known or used.
I maintain that they should be employed heavily and heartily!
The benefits are numerous.
The internal emulated disk on MP3000 does not perform as well as externally
attached (via channels) DASD.
Also, on the MP3000, the internal ethernet adapters do not perform as well
as externally channel attached controllers or the OSA2 cards on other S/390.
One other thing to check is compare
I'm sadly out of touch with mainframe hardware; it seems strange to me
I can get 120 Gbyte disks for my PC and you folk are using 2.3 Gbyte
drives on your mainframes. I know the theoretical limit is larger than
that, and was back when S/360 was announced.
One advantage to the
Pardon my ignorance in this matter, but what's the point? We already have a
great group here and I would personally prefer a single point of discussion.
Do newsgroups work any way like mailing lists such that messages are mass
emailed to members?
On Thursday 18 April 2002 09:05 am, you wrote:
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 10:14:57AM -0500, Rich Smrcina wrote:
Pardon my ignorance in this matter, but what's the point? We already have a
great group here and I would personally prefer a single point of discussion.
Do newsgroups work any way like mailing lists such that messages are mass
I hope this is not too vague, but is there an established way
to send a
message from Linux S/390 that will show up in an OS/390
LPAR's logs? I
was hoping to send a message from linux to the other end of it's CTC
channel that our ops could see (and react to).
If you have syslog enabled in
This is a formal Request For Discussion (RFD) for the creation of a
world-wide unmoderated Usenet newsgroup comp.os.linux.s390.
Please DO NOT link this mailing list to a Usenet group, or do it only at
your site as a gated mailing list! The S/N ratio is high, and I'd like to
keep it that way.
Thanks for the tip.
On Thursday 18 April 2002 10:53 am, you wrote:
Rich,
Plus, if the other end of the ESCON channel is talking to OS/390 or z/OS,
specify a protocol type of 3.
Mark Post
--
Rich Smrcina
Sytek Services, Inc.
Milwaukee, WI
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Catch the
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
John Summerfield
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 4:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: How to pre-allocate a 4GB File?
Of course, you need some disk-combining facility such as RAID or LVM if
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 10:39:00AM -0400, Hall, Ken (ECSS) wrote:
Also, SuSE, in their wisdom, changed the version ID string for the
kernel, so you have to insmod -f the drivers to get them to install.
I haven't tried the updated kernel yet, so I don't know if they fixed
this. One thing
The configuration of our network is such that we have a Fast
Ethernet OSA
Express adapter and it is dedicated to my Linux userid. We
have configured
Linux to use the QDIO driver. Is there a way that I can get
DHCP to work in
this environment?
Lucky you have a FE card -- you get a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
MVS never has supported any FBA devices. The problem is that the CKD
architecture is heavily embedded deep in two critical pieces of the
MVS core: program fetch and VTOC processing. I'm not familiar with the
details of PDSEs for program fetch, but if load libraries
Jay Maynard wrote:
The limit is that the cylinder number is a halfword, and exceeding that
breaks a LOT of things. There are even today things you can't put on a
3390-9 beyond cylinder 65535 (the JES2 spool dataset springs immediately to
mind).
Minor nit. On MVS a single extent cannot
Ok, here's where I'm at. From this display, it appears the Linux side is
connected, correct? To address Mark Post's point, the other end is OS/390,
where would I specify this protocol type of 3?
Thanks
bash-2.04# dmesg | tail
dmesg | tail
md driver 0.36.6 MAX_MD_DEV=4, MAX_REAL=8
Partition
John Summerfield wrote:
how many
corporate types here could justify $US2000 a seat for a reasonable set
of licences so as to leave the mainframes for income-earning activities?
How did you come up with the USD2000 a seat number?
Pick a number. If you have a better one, suggest it. The
Mark,
That would have been at the time you were prompted for your interface type
(Ethernet, CTC, etc.) and the parameters for it. You'll need to specify
something like
ctc=3,0x600,0x601,escon0
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Dorney, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
8. Normally, postings should be signed and include a valid return
address. However it is recognized that there may be legitimate reasons
for on-topic postings via anonymous remailers. e.g., if a matter is
commercially sensitive, or may jeopardize one's employment
John Summerfield wrote:
how many
corporate types here could justify $US2000 a seat for a reasonable set
of licences so as to leave the mainframes for income-earning activities?
How did you come up with the USD2000 a seat number?
Pick a number. If you have a better one, suggest
Jay Maynard wrote:
The limit is that the cylinder number is a halfword, and exceeding that
breaks a LOT of things. There are even today things you can't put on a
3390-9 beyond cylinder 65535 (the JES2 spool dataset springs immediately to
mind).
Minor nit. On MVS a single extent
If we're talking about personal use, non-production, I was thinking more
along the lines of $500. But this discussion is moot if we don't get our
point across.
On Thursday 18 April 2002 11:27 am, you wrote:
John Summerfield wrote:
how many
corporate types here could justify $US2000 a
Unfortunately we are emulating the geometry of the last generation of
ECDK devices (3390's) by creating virtual volumes within an array of
SCSI disks.
In its day the model 9 was a bulk data storage model with poor performance
characteristics. The performance of virtual 3390 volume however is a
I said (to John):
S/390 does also have FBA (fixed block architecture) DASD devices.
Sadly, even in the Linux world these are not widely known or used.
I maintain that they should be employed heavily and heartily!
The benefits are numerous.
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, Jay Maynard wrote:
What Dave Boyes said about SYSLOG is a good point. Also:
If we ever get VM here,
is there a linux - VM - OS/390 method that's better?
Sure. Presuming you have an NJE link between VM and OS/390,
something like this:
hcp smsg rscs msg mvshost mvsopcon something-to-say
When attempting to install IHS on Suse 7.0 I get the following:
ld-linux.so.2 is needed by IBM_HTTP_Server-1.3.19-1
libstdc++.so.2.9 is needed by IBM_HTTP_Server-1.3.19-1
I have been unable to find those files in any RPM on the Suse CDs.
Can I install glibc-2.1.2-4.s390.rpm and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Right. And since the actual backing store is fixed-block, I say let
that which is presented also be fixed-block and ditch the track,
record, count, and key info and the associated work.
With CKD, Linux must play the C/H/S game. With emulated CKD, so must
the DASD
Note that CD can be presented as FBA *today* on some S/390.
Specifically, for P/390 (and presumably for Multiprise) a CD image,
a .iso file, can be configured to the S/390 as an FBA.
Yup. Works on a Multiprise too, as Dave Jones can attest.
Adam
John Summerfield wrote:
how many
corporate types here could justify $US2000 a seat for a reasonable set
of licences so as to leave the mainframes for income-earning activities
?
How did you come up with the USD2000 a seat number?
Pick a number. If you have a better
An opinion...
There are some drawbacks to linux-390 at marist going to a newsgroup.
Email is much closer to instant gratification where with newsgroups it
can take a MUCH longer time for messages to propogate from feed to feed
until it ends up from the poster's news server to the reader's. It's
My concern is if this list is turned into a newsgroup, I won't be able to
access it from work. I'm not conversant with accessing newsgroups (Netscape
takes care of it at home), but I suspect that our firewall will block any
attempts to access one from inside (Too many porn ones to distract
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 12:44:13PM -0500, Adam Thornton wrote:
Note that CD can be presented as FBA *today* on some S/390.
Specifically, for P/390 (and presumably for Multiprise) a CD image,
a .iso file, can be configured to the S/390 as an FBA.
Yup. Works on a Multiprise too, as Dave
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 10:44:39AM -0500, Rick Troth wrote:
And what will happen now with SCSI attachment to zSeries?
I can only hope that there will NOT be some CKD protocol.
It just doesn't seem worth it when FBA is what is really happening.
Probably so, at least for VM, VSE, and Linux.
On Thursday, 04/18/2002 at 07:24 EST, Ross, Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I understand that a z800 OLF is designed to run Linux, and no other
guest
operating system. But can you define non-guest CMS users as you could
in
any other zVM environment, or is that precluded as well under z800 OLF?
There were gapless tapes generated by seismo trucks, used
for recording data from the geophones, normally seen as data
input for 3DFFTs. I last dealt with these 20+ years ago working
w/ oil exploration stuff. At the time triple-buffering and
multiactivity
On Thursday, 04/18/2002 at 08:56 EST, Rich Smrcina [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
To add a little confusion to the mix...I'm reminded that of course z/VM
can
run under z/VM on an IFL.
z/VM runs as normal on an IFL, Linux and z/VM can run under z/VM on that
IFL.
The restriction is that OS/390, z/OS
VSE used the FBA devices, 3310 3370s, in the 80s.
As of VSE 2.4, 3310s are not listed as supported, and 3370s are listed as
data volumes only, not for systems or installation use.
There is a 9336 listed under FBA that appearently can still be used as a
system or installation device, but I'm
John Summerfield wrote:
Not quite - the key for this purpose is included in the length of the
data block.
(65535 * 255 * 65535) is still fairly large. More than 2.3 Gbytes.
Don't think so. CKD stands for count,key,data. Each record on a track
has a count area, optional key area and
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 01:04:28PM -0500, Jay Maynard wrote:
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 12:44:13PM -0500, Adam Thornton wrote:
Note that CD can be presented as FBA *today* on some S/390.
Specifically, for P/390 (and presumably for Multiprise) a CD image,
a .iso file, can be configured to
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 11:00:48AM -0400, David Boyes wrote:
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 11:00:48 -0400
From: David Boyes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: sending a message to an OS/390 LPAR?
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I hope this is not too vague, but is there an established way
to
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 08:27:35PM +0200, Florian La Roche wrote:
if the author of hercules wants to have this, I'll reconsider this for
the next rawhide upload. :-)
That would be nice. Thanks!
I must point out, though, that I'm not really the author of Hercules; I'm
just the guy who gets to
I didn't see in your post
The disk space you are using on the MP3000...it is
1. Emulated DASD (IE part of the 14 GB of disk space that is available from the OS/2
side)?
2. Internal DASD
3. Channel attached DASD
The emulated DASD doesn't do writes too fast. But it does do reads fast.
For VSAM it isn't that bad; and Relative Byte Address is a Relative Byte
Address, on FBA it's a little easier becasue you just map from the first
byte on the pack. VTOC's used the relative record approach instead of an
CCHHRR.
Garry E. Ward
Senior Software Specialist
Maritz Research
Automotive
Greetings,
We are in the planning stages of possibly implementing LINUX on a VM/ESA
mainframe. One question that came up was in knowing if a report created
by an application under LINUX/390 could end up in the VM spool?
One idea I had was to mail the file to be printed to a VM user.
Any ideas
What if I want to connect My Production VM and IFL VM together with RSCS. Is
that going to be allowed.
Larry Davis, \|/
Nielsen Media Research (. .)
VM Systems Programmer ___ooO-(_)-Ooo___
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Alan Altmark
Yes, we're using z/VM 4.2 with guest lans and hipersockets to communicate
between virtual Linux images with
very good results. We're suing SLES 7; make sure that you get the latest
kernel patches from SuSe and the
the latest qdio OCO modules from IBM. And also make sure that z/VM has the
two PTFs
Mike,
You miss the point. This is not some challenge for the edu-weenies or
script kiddies to surmount.
It is a company policy/rule. Though shalt not ... It doesn't make any
difference how you do it
or why, violating the policy is grounds for dismissal.
As I said earlier, I can neither read nor
We have a setup where we can use lpr/lpd on Linux to print a file to a
printer owned by RSCS on VM using standard Linux and RSCS features. I see
no reason (in principle) why this couldn't be modified to send the print to
the VM spool.
You do not need a parachute to skydive. You only need a
Greetings;
Since I can neither read nor post to usenet newsgroups I will have to reply
right here.
If someone wishes to forward my comments to the appropriate usenet
newsgroup
please feel free to do so.
I think the proposal is a bad idea for many reasons. Some of which follow.
1 - Many of the
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Adam Thornton
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 10:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FBA for Jay [was: Re: How to pre-allocate a 4GB File?]
Note that CD can be presented as FBA *today* on some
So many things to measure, so little time
Possible problems:
Network: MTU, errors, window size, settings for interface
TCPIP: buffers/subpools? waiting for CPU?
Processor: Is it over utilized? have a large DSPSLICE set?
Storage: Paging? linux swapping? buffer storage small?
DASD: no
See my earlier posting today wrt to using RSCS as a LPD server. Works like a
champ.
-- db
David Boyes
Sine Nomine Associates
RIP ER 1900-2002 GSTQ
One question that came up was in knowing if a
report created
by an application under LINUX/390 could end up in the VM spool?
Hello -
Does anybody have actual current prices including support and ISO CD's for
the latest distributions: REDHAT 7.2, SUSE 7.2 and TURBO?
Thanks - Dan
Works fine for us. RSCS on production VM talks to RSCS on IFL VM via real
ESCON CTCA.
You do not need a parachute to skydive. You only need a parachute to
skydive twice. -Motto of the Darwin Society
Gordon W. Wolfe, Ph.D. (425) 865-5940
VM Technical Services, The Boeing Company
--
In a word, no.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Davis, Lawrence [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 2:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: CMS Users under z800 OLF
What if I want to connect My Production VM and IFL VM together with RSCS. Is
that going to be
When I have to move a file to/from linux under VM, I use FTP. Works great.
-Original Message-
From: Michael Horlick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 12:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Printing under LINUX/390 to VM
Greetings,
We are in the planning
Mark,
I can't get the installer to accept CTC=0, says it's an invalid protocol.
Should I be doing
unshod ctc setup='escon=3,0x600,0x601,escon0'.
Even though the dmesg command you gave me says he's connected with the
remote site, I've been unable to ping anything sucessfully.
Mark
-Original
Or use the HUJI-NJE sendfile support as a filter in /etc/printcap. With a
little hacking, this would be trivial, and you could connect the Linux
system as just another NJE node.
Guess I need to finish that JCL major mode for Emacs I was working on a
while back.
-- db
David Boyes
Sine Nomine
In a previous posting, I said In a word, no.
Looks like I have to take this back. I was experiencing brain fade, and
mistaking RSCS-RSCS communication with the unlicensed-on-IFL RJE/NJE/SNA
functions. Sorry for the mis-information. :(
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Davis,
Sergey,
The readme file says:
To create the complete linux kernel sources, the following
patches need to be applied in sequence:
linux-2.4.7.tar.gz (GNU)
+ linux-2.4.7-s390.diff (IBM)
+ linux-2.4.7-s390-1.diff (IBM)
+ linux-2.4.7-s390-2.diff (IBM)
+ linux-2.4.7-s390-3.diff (IBM)
+
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 11:17:45PM +0200, Phil Payne wrote:
Mainframers - at least MVS types - aren't used to thinking that way. A sile
as a stream of bytes is completely alien to them.
System types, or application types? We've had RBA since VSAM I - lots of things
like DB2 logs
are
Mainframers - at least MVS types - aren't used to thinking that way. A sile
as a stream of bytes is completely alien to them.
System types, or application types? We've had RBA since VSAM I - lots of things like
DB2 logs
are RBA-governed.
--
Phil Payne
http://www.isham-research.com
+44
Alright, found out he had started the df/dss logical dump long before I
thought. Before I could umount the device. Sorry for all my posting. I'll
be quiet for awhile, promise :).
~ Daniel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What we had tried before was a physical dump, which took seconds. Tried
to
Hello,
I am working on installing SuSE Linux 7.0 in one of our LPARS. I created a
DASD IPL Linux volume and used that to IPL the LPAR. The IPL goes normally
until it gets to the following messages, after which it dies:
Lvm - Driver successfully initialized
Md driver 0.36.6 MAX_MD_DEV=4,
Neal,
From what I can tell, those versions are down-level of what's on SuSE 7.0.
The ld-linux.so.2 is usually just a symbolic link to your current glibc
library which in your case would be ld-2.1.3.so. So:
cd /lib
ln -s ld-2.1.3.so ld-linux.so.2
Should fix that one.
The other one is going to
Hello All,
Actually the symbolic link will not solve the problem. IHS is looking at
the RPM database for the information. I did the install without the
dependency check and IHS is working fine. Other solution is to get the
compat (don't remember the complete name with version numbers) RPM from
I want to install RH 7.2, LPAR mode.
I am at the the point where I am ready to run rhsetup. Do I need to
download ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/rawhide/s390/* and pick
up everything except the SRPMS in order to complete the installation?
Thanks,
Paul
1 - 100 of 117 matches
Mail list logo
