Can I use the same LCS module with two type of
adapters ( TR, EN)? we have a machine running suse7
and we are trying to start the ethernet adapter while
the TR adapter is up using the same module but it wont
load.
Thanks
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo!
bnet - impossible??=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
On 17.03.2003 at 15:16:37, Bishop, Peter G [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think I established clearly enough with them exactly what a z/VM
guest
is and can do, at least from the routing viewpoint, which as
On 17.03.2003 at 18:10:15, Abdullah Al-humaid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can I use the same LCS module with two type of
adapters ( TR, EN)? we have a machine running suse7
and we are trying to start the ethernet adapter while
the TR adapter is up using the same module but it wont
load.
Yes,
the kernel is 2.4.7
They -WERE- the typical erros when you load a module
about IRQ and stuff.
I was trying to pass him the addresses but it fails.
thanks to your answer I figured I do not have to do
insmod anymore. now all I do is ifconfig eth0 and
it works.
Now my question is how important
hi list,
We recently installed Suse 7.0 in our H30 machine (lpar mode). During
installation we specified only two dasds using the insmod dasd command.
But now we want to add some more dasds to the system. How to do this.
thanx in advance.
janaks.
We recently installed Suse 7.0 in our H30 machine (lpar mode). During
installation we specified only two dasds using the insmod dasd command.
But now we want to add some more dasds to the system. How to do this.
echo add device range=devno-range /proc/dasd/devices
Freundliche Grüsse,
Klaus
oops..failed to mention this..my kernel is 2.2.16.
when i do echo add device it says
dasd:unknown command add device range=350-351
my version of kernel doesnot support this command i guess.
regds.
janaks.
-Original Message-
From: Klaus Bergmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday,
Redbooks
Linux on IBM eServer zSeries and S/390: System Management
Revised: March 12, 2003 ISBN: 0738426105 482 pages
Explore the book online at
From the NGPT developers...
On behalf of the NGPT team, we would like to announce a change in direction
for the Next Generation POSIX Threading (NGPT) project.
As many of you may know by now, a new POSIX threading library NPTL
(http://people.redhat.com/drepper/nptl-design.pdf) is now available
oops..failed to mention this..my kernel is 2.2.16.
Dynamic dasd attachment came with 2.4. SLES7 is based on 2.4
Klaus Bergmann
Hi,
well, I know that my question is more VM related, that linux related, but
anyway
I have two VMs and want to run Linux-guests on both of them. My idea is
that I can start a guest on both sides, so I have to make an entry in the
user directoies on both VMs... so far, so good.
Is there a
how do i get to samba
on kernel 2.2.16 i do
ipaddress:901
i am on kernel 2.4.17 on s390
can you help??
Ralph
Ralph,
Is the swat line uncommented in /etc/inetd.conf? By default, it is often in
the file but commented out. If so, uncomment that line and run
/etc/init.d/inetd restart, then try again from a browser.
-Mike MacIsaac, IBM [EMAIL PROTECTED] (845) 433-7061
Noll, Ralph [EMAIL
i guess what i meant was to get to swat::
the online config tool..
-Original Message-
From: Michael MacIsaac [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 7:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: getting to samba
Ralph,
Is the swat line uncommented in
If you are using RACF/VM, then the two VM systems can share the RACF
database (along with any z/OS systems as well, I think). I don't know of any
way to keep two separate VM systems in sync using the native security.
--
John McKown
Senior Technical Specialist
UICI Insurance Center
Applications
You're correct. The ability to dynamically add/remove DASD is in the 2.4
kernels, not the 2.2 kernels. You'll need to update your parmfile in /boot,
and re-run the silo command. Then, reboot.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Janakiraman S , Tidel Park - Chennai
[mailto:[EMAIL
My apologies in advance if this already made it to the listserv. I have reason to
believe that it did not make it though since we are using an old version of GroupWise
(v5.5) running on evan an older version of Novell (V4.11), and the action status of
'pending' does little for my confidence.
Abdullah,
It should be possible, but not by trying to load the module twice. You'll
need to provide the parameters for both interfaces when the module is first
loaded. The Linux for S/390 Device Drivers and Installation Commands book
at
Having those entries is what allows you to do ifconfig eth0 and have the
lcs module loaded automatically.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Abdullah Al-humaid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 5:36 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: using lcs module with two
But he's using SuSE 7.0, not SLES7. That's the original version, with a
2.2.16 kernel.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Klaus Bergmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 7:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: add new dasds
oops..failed to mention this..my
Ralph,
That's what he's talking about. SWAT has it's own built-in web server, and
it uses inetd to listen on port 901 for any requests. That means that
/etc/inetd.conf has to tell inetd to start SWAT when it gets a request on
that port.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Noll, Ralph
Nice job, Leland. Thanks for contributing!
Alan Altmark
Sr. Software Engineer
IBM z/VM Development
I only contributed a little S390 stuff. I wasn't part of this team, just
reporting their announcement.
-Original Message-
Neale, I know how hard it is to let go of code you've written and nurtured.
I has to be particularly difficult to do so in favor of someone else's code.
Your decision
As David's pointed out, DIRMAINT and CSE let you do this fine. In fact
you can do this without CSE, but then you need to develop your own
locking mechanism to make sure that the same guest (assuming it has the
same dasd on each side) isn't running in both places simultaneously.
Having two guests
On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 09:26:21AM -0500, Kenneth Illingsworth wrote:
I suspect that there is an unistall parameter like RPM --uninstall
package name available?
I dunno about webmin, but, indeed, rpm --uninstall (or rpm -e) would do
the trick.
Adam
Neale, I know how hard it is to let go of code you've written and nurtured. I has to
be particularly difficult to do so in favor of someone else's code. Your decision to
do this in pursuit of a larger goal is admirable. Kudos to you and the rest of the
team for an incredibly mature and
Use root and your root password.
-Original Message-
From: Noll, Ralph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 10:08 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LINUX-390] getting to samba
ok that worked .. thanks a bunch
now i am getting the attached
bad auth...
Thank you guys for VM. I'm sure it will become old hat one day, but right
now it still brings new fun everyday. And what good is work if you can't
have fun doing it. :-)
Leland
-Original Message-
From: Alan Altmark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 9:09 AM
To:
Leland's also agreed to make the patch available from the linuxvm.org web
site. (Redundancy is usually a good thing. :)
You can get it from his page at
http://www.homerow.net/projects/zlinux/multiboot.htm,
or from http://linuxvm.org/Patches/index.html.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
Any idea when/if it will become part of zipl officially?
-Original Message-
From: Post, Mark K [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 10:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LINUX-390] Patch available to add LOADPARM
support to ZIPL
Leland's also agreed to
But so does the HMC I/O handler and the shutdown signal. The QDIO driver
uses the undocumented SIGA instruction but it's there. There needs to be a
mechanism where code (under the GPL) can be entered into the development
stream without worrying about lawyers at 10 paces. At the moment if the
IBM
Curiousity question. Why should IBM be able to say what will or will not get
into the zLinux kernel (and this is not even the kernel, but only zipl)? I
am grateful to IBM for the fine work that they have done to make zLinux
available. But I don't think that they should have any sort of veto power
John,
In general, they don't have the power to veto contributions. Since the good
folks in Boeblingen are the architecture maintainers, they have a _lot_ of
influence. That's true of every kernel developer that's responsible for a
certain area. Overriding them is done reluctantly, but it has
Oh, oh. I hope I didn't start something with this. What I really should
have said was...
I haven't even tried submitting it to (who???) the original developers of
zipl.
I would not have even hesitated had this been for the Intel world. But,
this is BIG business kinda stuff and, quite
OK, so if I read this correctly, you want to boot the system, have it do
some custom setup if it hasn't already been done, and then record the
fact that your setup has been done for future boots. At some point, you
want to be able to revert to the master configuration and re-do the
custom setup in
On Mon, 2003-03-17 at 16:29, Lucius, Leland wrote:
Oh, oh. I hope I didn't start something with this. What I really should
have said was...
I haven't even tried submitting it to (who???) the original developers of
zipl.
I would not have even hesitated had this been for the Intel world.
Hello from Gregg C Levine
4.11 isn't that older version of Netware for this timeperiod, I had a
customer who was still using series 3 versions and series 2 versions
for product activities. As for your problems regarding Postifx, all I
can state, is that it makes sense what you're doing. I have
that's what i used
-Original Message-
From: Hall, Ken (IDS ECCS) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 9:45 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: getting to samba
Use root and your root password.
-Original Message-
From: Noll, Ralph [mailto:[EMAIL
Oh, oh. I hope I didn't start something with this. What I really should
have said was...
I haven't even tried submitting it to (who???) the original developers of
zipl.
The original developer of zipl is Carsten Otte ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). Recently
Peter Oberparleiter ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) took
Oh, oh. I hope I didn't start something with this. What I
really should
have said was...
I haven't even tried submitting it to (who???) the original
developers of
zipl.
The original developer of zipl is Carsten Otte
([EMAIL PROTECTED]). Recently
Peter Oberparleiter ([EMAIL
On Monday, 03/17/2003 at 05:49 GMT, Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Most of us care more about the x86 stuff being correct. If one in 10,000
users hits a bug its a problem on x86, but might never happen on 390 8)
Dems fighten woids! ;-)
Alan Altmark
Sr. Software Engineer
IBM z/VM
Another serious bug has been found in Samba. A new version, Samba 2.2.8 is
now out. Look to your distributor for a new version, or build it yourself.
The flaw creates an exposure to remote root access. It's present in _all_
2.x versions except 2.2.8.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From:
Most of us care more about the x86 stuff being correct. If
one in 10,000
users hits a bug its a problem on x86, but might never happen
on 390 8)
That's kinda why I wouldn't have hesitated. MANY, MANY more testers
available.
Leland
Hello from Gregg C Levine
Second the motion! As long as Linux is Linux, if a bug is reproducible
in both worlds, then we have a good chance of sustaining a good
argument.
---
Gregg C Levine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Force
bad auth...
Use root and your root password.
that's what i used
root for the system, or root for smbpasswd? It needs to be root for the
system. But you probably tried that.
Is this a samba you compiled yourself? If so did you configure it
--with-pam?
~ Daniel
Root for system. It uses whatever ID has UID 0 for update authority. Any other
usable ID should give you query-only access to some of the screens.
I have systems that use local domain authorization (smbpasswd), and remote domain
authentication (SECURITY=DOMAIN with a PASSWORD SERVER), and it
nope did not compile samba.. it came with install
tried root and roots password.. still a no go
is there a samba auth file somewhere
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Jarboe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 12:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: getting to
Actually, a third choice proved to be backreving Postfix to postfix-1.1.7-6.src.rpm
which allowed a rebuild requiring more of the standard RPMs from the MCS mirror site
for this distribution. I guess it would be safe to say that progress on s390 will tend
to lag that of i386.
Now it appears
Ralph,
nope did not compile samba.. it came with install
tried root and roots password.. still a no go
By chance did you make a mistake the first time? I've found that once you
mistype the password, you won't be prompted for it again until you bring
down all copies of your browser and start a
been there done that...
surley i don't have to reboot like
on a windows machine
-Original Message-
From: Michael MacIsaac [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 1:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: getting to samba
Ralph,
nope did not compile samba.. it
Speaking from my recent experience with Samba, I also did not have to compile Samba.
But I did have to take the RPMs I got for the particular distribution I was on and
install them. This was accomplished after I acquired the latest tarball for Webmin
tarred it and installed it. I then used
Hello again from Gregg C Levine
Phil you may be right. But I totally disagree with the columnist.
Especially since its on Yahoo.
---
Gregg C Levine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Force will be with you...Always. Obi-Wan Kenobi
Saturday, I was in to install my new IOCDS for Linux with a CTC definition so I can
communicate with my Linux Lpar from my production TCPIP. The devices on one side of
the connection, the one defined as a CNC Chpid, do not come up online. Here are my
IOCDS definitions:
CHPID
the article came from osopinion.com
So true---If more was published on history of the mainframe and facilities
avail.it would be shocking to all the so called NEW revolutions .
://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2cid=75ncid=738e=9u=/nf/20030317/tc_nf/21020
--
Phil Payne
http://www.isham-research.com
+44 7785 302 803
+49 173 6242039
One thing that I noticed immediately is that your CNTLUNIT macro had
CUADDR=0 on both of them. This is wrong. Here is our defination:
CHPID PATH=(32),SHARED, *
PARTITION=((LP1,MAIN,RDC1,SMC1,TECH,ZVM),(LP1,MAIN,RDC1,*
I've been a sys.prog. for about 20 years, 15 of those in VM
and I don't
know of any feature that will let a sys prog do this!
Well, at least for one V=R guest with proper preparation, you can IPL VM
around the V=R guest with no interruption in service to the guest. It
takes all dedicated
on 390 Port [EMAIL PROTECTED]
03/17/2003 03:45 PM
Please respond to Linux on 390 Port
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Interesting perspective
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2cid=75ncid=738e=9u=/nf/20030317/tc_nf/21020
--
Phil Payne
I installed Tomcat version 4. When I start up tomcat is squawks about an
error:
no valid java configuration found in directory /etc/java
But Tomcat does come up.
When I point my browser to http://mylinux:8080 I do see Tomcat
functioning (somewhat) the Servlet examples work fine but the JSP
Perhaps the writer was referring to a Sysplex where multiple LPARs are
running z/OS with a coupling facility in the middle. Using MQ Series
clustering, DB2 Data Sharing, VSAM RLS, VIPA, and the like, you could
switch workload from one image to another, IPL the image you drained,
and migrate
David,
I seem to recall doing this with VM XA/SF running a MVS/XA guest about 16
years ago. I thought it was the neatest thing since sliced bread!
Bob Richards
VP, Enterprise Technologist
Technical Services
SunTrust Banks, Inc.
(404) 575-2798
-Original Message-
From: David Boyes
I think only the big user who has a sysplex can really keep up something running all
the time. You can do rolling IPLs on an MVS sysplex, and install maintenance or a new
release of the operating system without shutting the whole sysplex down. Of course us
having an MP3000, I have no real
Yeah. Scared the dickens out of me the first time we tested it with a
system that mattered -- I kept thinking if this thing burps on one of
the production disks, we are *dead meat*. Fortunately, it works
flawlessly.
The boss bought us cinnamon rolls after the test (yum, yum!). Funny how
you
Running Linux/390, SuSE SLES-7... We are getting a segmentation fault in a
JAVA application (as indicated by the core dump), but we can't find the
javacore.txt file that we would also expect to receive. What
switch/knob/dial/button did we forget to set?
Thanks,
Mike Brauweiler
Has anyone done a successful source compile of LPRng on SLES7 with
gcc3.2? What was the secret? I was able to manually patch config.sub and
config.guess and the make went through happy, no errors or warnings.
Any suggestions would be appreciated.
Steve
Your questions are a little confusing. The title talks about segmentation
faults, but you ask about successful compiles.
Try reducing the optimization level in the make files to -O1 or even -O0.
That has, sometimes, corrected that problem for me, with other packages.
What version of glibc are
On Mon, 2003-03-17 at 14:46, Post, Mark K wrote:
Your questions are a little confusing. The title talks about segmentation
faults, but you ask about successful compiles.
Sorry Mark, to clarify:
1. The linux guest has been updated with gcc3.2 and glibc2.5.
2. Many products have been compiled
John,
Thanks for the info. I will try this. I'll have to read up on the CUADDR parameter,
as I'm not really sure exactly what it does. I will install this change dynamically.
I'll have to study this some more tomorrow. Time to go home now.
Eric Bielefeld
Sr. MVS Systems Programmer
PH
I've done it, but not on a SLES7 system. It was a SuSE 7.0 system. I
started downloading SRPM files from the SuSE 8.1 distribution and compiling
them. (talk about a _lot_ of compiles!) I just tested it, and I was able
to print a file using the lpr command.
autoconf-2.53-148
automake-1.6.3-36
On Mon, 2003-03-17 at 15:26, Post, Mark K wrote:
I've done it, but not on a SLES7 system. It was a SuSE 7.0 system. I
started downloading SRPM files from the SuSE 8.1 distribution and compiling
them. (talk about a _lot_ of compiles!) I just tested it, and I was able
to print a file using
Hi Steven,
Just curious...did you recompile libc as well?
Leland
FYI: I've gotten it to work under SLES7...
tux:~ # cat /etc/SuSE-release
SuSE SLES-7 (s390x)
VERSION = 7.2
tux:~ # gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 3.2.1
Copyright (C) 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the
On Mon, 2003-03-17 at 15:56, Lucius, Leland wrote:
Hi Steven,
Just curious...did you recompile libc as well?
Leland
FYI: I've gotten it to work under SLES7...
tux:~ # cat /etc/SuSE-release
SuSE SLES-7 (s390x)
VERSION = 7.2
tux:~ # gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 3.2.1
Copyright (C) 2002
Yes sir, although right now I don't remember the exact version.
Have you tried (or can you still) using the original libc? I never
experienced any segfaults, but I didn't like the lib / lib64 stuff and
didn't feel like dealing with it, so I just stuck with what came in the
distro. The
On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 02:07:12PM -0500, Kenneth Illingsworth wrote:
Actually, a third choice proved to be backreving Postfix to
postfix-1.1.7-6.src.rpm which allowed a rebuild requiring more of the
standard RPMs from the MCS mirror site for this distribution. I guess
it would be safe to say
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003, Kenneth Illingsworth wrote:
My apologies in advance if this already made it to the listserv. I have reason to
believe that it did not make it though since we are using an old version of
GroupWise (v5.5) running on evan an older version of Novell (V4.11), and the action
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003, Adam Thornton wrote:
On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 09:26:21AM -0500, Kenneth Illingsworth wrote:
I suspect that there is an unistall parameter like RPM --uninstall
package name available?
I dunno about webmin, but, indeed, rpm --uninstall (or rpm -e) would do
Not rpm
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003, Alan Altmark wrote:
On Monday, 03/17/2003 at 05:49 GMT, Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Most of us care more about the x86 stuff being correct. If one in 10,000
users hits a bug its a problem on x86, but might never happen on 390 8)
Dems fighten woids! ;-)
Give
On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 04:46:23PM -0500, Joe Poole wrote:
Perhaps the writer was referring to a Sysplex where multiple LPARs are
running z/OS with a coupling facility in the middle. Using MQ Series
clustering, DB2 Data Sharing, VSAM RLS, VIPA, and the like, you could
switch workload from one
On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 02:18:58PM -0500, Michael MacIsaac wrote:
Ralph,
nope did not compile samba.. it came with install
tried root and roots password.. still a no go
By chance did you make a mistake the first time? I've found that once you
mistype the password, you won't be prompted
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003, Steve Gentry wrote:
Further . . .
Once a fix is made to the code, the patched version of the OS can be
swapped into place . . . without taking down the system
I've been a sys.prog. for about 20 years, 15 of those in VM and I don't
know of any feature that will let a
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003, Joe Poole wrote:
Perhaps the writer was referring to a Sysplex where multiple LPARs are
running z/OS with a coupling facility in the middle. Using MQ Series
clustering, DB2 Data Sharing, VSAM RLS, VIPA, and the like, you could
switch workload from one image to another,
On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 11:09:32AM +0800, John Summerfield wrote:
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003, Kenneth Illingsworth wrote:
Please, encourage your email client to wrap lines. That was rather hard
to read on my 128-wide screen.
meto
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003, Richards.Bob wrote:
David,
I seem to recall doing this with VM XA/SF running a MVS/XA guest about 16
years ago. I thought it was the neatest thing since sliced bread!
Back in the 1970s, I decided I'd like my own Personal S370/168 for a few
hours, so I dropped into the
On Mon, 2003-03-17 at 19:32, John Summerfield wrote:
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003, Steve Gentry wrote:
Further . . .
Once a fix is made to the code, the patched version of the OS can be
swapped into place . . . without taking down the system
I've been a sys.prog. for about 20 years, 15 of
On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
RedHat = 7.3 is shipped with postfix. I don't see any exim package on a
nearby RH80 mirror.
Quite right. I've had that fixation for a while;-(.
I've been using versions of Clark Connect which are built on RHL 7.x,
and _that_ does have exim.
So, make
Hymilaya is ZLE or non-stop Windows like kernel. The linux HA is Steeleye SW
and HW like this:
http://h18004.www1.hp.com/solutions/enterprise/highavailability/dl380/index.
html
Alan Robertson's linux-ha.org project is the heartbeat package that has
some kits available; when he was at SuSE I
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003, Steven A. Adams wrote:
I think ComPaqard calls this Hymilaya (used to be Tandem).
Did Tandem use Linux? I'm sure I went to a Tandem Non-stop presentation
late 70s, early 80s.
According to my info (Reliable Linux, Iain Campbell, Wiley), ha-linux
had its genesis with Alan
On Mon, 2003-03-17 at 20:06, John Summerfield wrote:
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003, Steven A. Adams wrote:
I think ComPaqard calls this Hymilaya (used to be Tandem).
Did Tandem use Linux? I'm sure I went to a Tandem Non-stop presentation
late 70s, early 80s.
No offense intended here but Tandem
On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, John Summerfield wrote:
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003, Steven A. Adams wrote:
I think ComPaqard calls this Hymilaya (used to be Tandem).
Did Tandem use Linux? I'm sure I went to a Tandem Non-stop presentation
late 70s, early 80s.
According to my info (Reliable Linux, Iain
Hey, I'll throw down with Alan if I get a personal Z out of the deal. Heck,
I'll even let him win!!! ;-)
Leland
-Original Message-
From: John Summerfield
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 3/17/03 9:18 PM
Subject: Re: Patch available to add LOADPARM support to ZIPL
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003, Alan
91 matches
Mail list logo
