Fargusson.Alan wrote:
But if you use an index register instead of HL you could use an offset. Now the 8080 didn't have index registers, so this may have been an issue on these.
But the index registers are for weenies... ;-) one extra byte of
opcode, and 12 T-states. Doing an INC (IX+1) takes
Microsoft has used Akamai for eons for downloads of all sorts. I find it
amusing that people think that Microsoft would have an issue with using a
linux server for something. I guess this
http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/graph?site=www.linuxworldexpo.com is amusing
also.
-Original
On Mon, 18 Aug 2003, Ryan Ware wrote:
Microsoft has used Akamai for eons for downloads of all sorts. I find it
amusing that people think that Microsoft would have an issue with using a
linux server for something. I guess this
http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/graph?site=www.linuxworldexpo.com
Which was?
I realize the whole blaster thing is egg on Microsoft's secure computing
initiative face, and that Windows itself is a playground for kiddies.
-Original Message-
From: John Summerfield [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 8:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Which was...In order for Microsoft to protect themselves from the Worm,
they switched to Linux rather than
using/fixing their Windows servers. At least that's what I gathered from
the article.
Ryan Ware
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ic.com
They didn't switch to Linux to avoid fixing their servers. The change was
to escape the worm ddos that was coming. Would it be different if Akamai
used Windows servers? That the service provider runs Linux rather than
Windows is akin to getting a Honda instead of a Toyota from the car rental
Then you would have gathered wrong. They didn't switch servers rather
than fixing their own software. They were undergoing a Distributed Denial
of Service attack, not an infection of their own systems. They did switch
to a content hosting service with much, much more bandwidth than they
Hi list,
I often hear the suggestion to turn off unneeded services. SuSE SLES-8
seems to have a lot of services off, but there are probably more that are
not needed. However, I'm wary of turning off any that are critical to
Linux. Will any of the following be a problem with the base functioning
Actually, I would say it's akin to a person who works for Toyota driving a
Honda...
But seriously, do you think MS would have switched to a company whose
servers were running Windows?
Or is it just a coinsidence that Akamai uses Linux?
Gotcha, my bad.
Post, Mark K
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
m To
Sent by: Linux on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
390 Port cc
Mike,
The suggestion is normally aimed at network-accessible services. Still, of
the list of things you have, I would probably keep atd running, and perhaps
smbfs if you ever envision doing a CIFS mount. The only one I can't say one
way or the other is the hwscan, since I don't know what it
On Mon, 18 Aug 2003, Post, Mark K wrote:
Then you would have gathered wrong. They didn't switch servers rather
than fixing their own software. They were undergoing a Distributed Denial
of Service attack, not an infection of their own systems. They did switch
to a content hosting service
I've not researched it, but just by it's name I've thought that it might be
related to device recognition. But then again, never judge a book by it's
cover.
On Monday 18 August 2003 09:34 am, you wrote:
Mike,
The suggestion is normally aimed at network-accessible services. Still, of
the
I tend to think in this case Akamai were the people for the job, it was
irrelevant to Microsoft what they used to do it. To Akamai, it was a
strategic decision to use Linux in their business. Both decisions were
pragmattic.
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Casey [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
That document shows that for some things windows is definitely not a ready
fit. Internet infrastructure is definitely one of those things. If
Microsoft is truly switched over, I've heard the database backend is still
on Solaris - which I would believe, they probably are running a hybrid
version
Hello from Gregg C Levine
Don't forget hotplug. According to the Linux-hotplug site on Source
Forge, the S/390 version of this, uses it, for managing certain
events, specifically the channel ones, such as the machine check
events. Go here, if you're in doubt.
On Mon, 2003-08-18 at 09:26, Michael MacIsaac wrote:
Hi list,
I often hear the suggestion to turn off unneeded services. SuSE SLES-8
seems to have a lot of services off, but there are probably more that are
not needed. However, I'm wary of turning off any that are critical to
Linux. Will
Malcolm Beattie's Unit Record device driver seems to no longer be
available from his old website. Does anyone have it, and could someone
please send the source code to me?
Adam
I am trying to add dasd volumes on SuSe Interprice Server 8, the following is the
status of my volumes, when I try to do
fdasd /dev/dasdk i get the following Error
lnx1:/boot/zipl # fdasd /dev/dasdk
fdasd error: open error
Could not open device '/dev/dasdk' in read-only mode!
When trying
Did you add the device on the fly? If so how did you do it? I've found that
if you use:
echo add device=xxx /proc/dasd/devices
that I see the condition that you saw.
The correct way is:
echo add device range=xxx-yyy /proc/dasd/devices
On Monday 18 August 2003 03:34 am, you wrote:
I am
On Monday 18 August 2003 21:53, Rich Smrcina wrote:
Did you add the device on the fly? If so how did you do it? I've found
that if you use:
echo add device=xxx /proc/dasd/devices
that I see the condition that you saw.
That is an incorrect syntax, I suppose what happened to you is
that the
What do the rest of your DASD volumes look like?
cat /proc/dasd/devices
What kernel modules do you have loaded?
lsmod
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Moloko Monyepao [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 4:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Addind
Pardon the intrusion, but this seems the simplest way to reach an
interested party.
Here's part of a bounce message I got:
The original message was received at Tue, 12 Aug 2003 10:20:05 -0400
from d01av01.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.215]
- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors
On Mon, 18 Aug 2003, Jim Elliott wrote:
Pardon the intrusion, but this seems the simplest way to reach an
interested party.
Here's part of a bounce message I got:
The original message was received at Tue, 12 Aug 2003 10:20:05 -0400
from d01av01.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.215]
- The
On Tue, 19 Aug 2003, John Summerfield wrote:
On Mon, 18 Aug 2003, Jim Elliott wrote:
We tracked this down to a DDNS problem. Still some problems with this
new (at least inside IBM) technology. Thanks for letting us know and
the problem is being looked at to prevent future occurences.
On Mon, 2003-08-18 at 06:44, John Summerfield wrote:
On Mon, 18 Aug 2003, Ryan Ware wrote:
Microsoft has used Akamai for eons for downloads of all sorts. I find it
amusing that people think that Microsoft would have an issue with using a
linux server for something. I guess this
26 matches
Mail list logo
