*** Reply to note of Fri, 22 Nov 2002 02:42:13 -0500 (EST/CDT)
*** by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You could try to increase the number of server threads for the nfs server
in /etc/rc.config:
#
# the kernel nfs-server supports multiple server threads
#
USE_KERNEL_NFSD_NUMBER=16
You can also
Adam,
Thanks for the reply.
do you mean via guest LANs, or do you mean each guest gets its own OSA
port?
own OSA ports.
I was in transit and offline most of yesterday and now I can't get to the
offending system from my dialup. I'll do some digging Monday and try to
post with more meaningful
for advice on how
to check that. Perhaps a very lame comparison, but maybe you'd want to
check that as well?
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Michael MacIsaac [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 2:42 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: System reset message in /var
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 10:47:56AM -0500, Post, Mark K wrote:
Mike,
Very few, if any. I did a Google search on System reset (remote) and came
up with a hit in the CTC driver, of all things:
H.
r2:~ # find /lib/modules/2.4.7-timer-SMP -type f | xargs grep -i system reset
Binary file
When you say patched (.8) qdio/qeth drivers sharing the OSA, do you
mean via guest LANs, or do you mean each guest gets its own OSA port?
Or do you mean that one guest owns the OSA and talks to everyone else
with CTCs, which would at least explain why we're seeing a string that
only seems to occur
Hi list,
We're seeing network problems (especiallly NFS) under heavy loads. The
configuration is G6 with OSA Express Gigabit Ethernet. Linux images are
SLES-7 with patched (.8) qdio/qeth drivers sharing the OSA. In the NFS
server's /var/log/messages we see constant:
Nov 20 15:16:30 linuxnfs
