On 19-Apr-99 Tobias Ekbom wrote:
--Murn wrote:
On Sun, 18 Apr 1999, Tobias wrote:
What I wanted was a discussion about TCP/IP in computers with very
limited memory.
--Tobias Ekbom
I have written a SLIP/IP/ICMP/UDP-stack that fits in 2000 bytes program
and 36 bytes RAM (not KILObytes)
I have written a SLIP/IP/ICMP/UDP-stack that fits in 2000 bytes program
and 36 bytes RAM (not KILObytes) including operating system and device drivers,
that fits in a PIC 16F84.
So it isn't a problem to implement networking in limited memory.
Is it possible to have a look on your code
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric_Renet?= writes:
I have written a SLIP/IP/ICMP/UDP-stack that fits in 2000 bytes program
and 36 bytes RAM (not KILObytes) including operating system and device drivers,
that fits in a PIC 16F84.
So it isn't a problem to implement networking in limited
Alistair Riddoch writes:
I agree about GEM. The late ST version which were supposed to run on a
multitasking OS were not well suited to it.
One of the more promising possibilities is the nanogui project found at
http://www.linuxhacker.org/nanogui/
This is designed to be as small as
unscribe
The GEM code is neat, and it *is* GPL'd, so maybe we can play
with it, but it's always more fun to write our own code than
port. =)
Sure, it's more fun, but if you port code, then you can actually get some
sort of relatively fast turnover of applications.
GEM is btw pretty limited. You
On Wed, 21 Apr 1999, bradleyb wrote:
On Wed, 21 Apr 1999, Stefan Franke wrote:
Today the sources of GEM/3 v3.13 for IBM PC were released
under GPL and available for download, see
http://www.devili.iki.fi/cpm/gemworld.html
I can't connect to this address... Anybody know a mirror? or could
