Re: ELKS 0.0.81 slower than the 0.0.76

2000-07-15 Thread Luke Farrar



On Thu, 13 Jul 2000, Greg Haerr wrote:

 the older versions are faster
 :  than the newer. The starting is the same but the shell is slower.
 : Mods to tty stuff shouldn't give any sort of noticeable difference, or fs
 : stuff. There is mention of changes to timer code, but I don't see why any
 : stuff like that should make any noticable difference.
 
 
 What do you mean, "the shell is slower"?  You mean the tty output
 is slower?  The prompt is displayed after some delay when no
 input is typed?  Or applications are read from disk and are slower
 to start?
 





Re: ELKS 0.0.81 slower than the 0.0.76

2000-07-13 Thread Greg Haerr

the older versions are faster
:  than the newer. The starting is the same but the shell is slower.
: Mods to tty stuff shouldn't give any sort of noticeable difference, or fs
: stuff. There is mention of changes to timer code, but I don't see why any
: stuff like that should make any noticable difference.


What do you mean, "the shell is slower"?  You mean the tty output
is slower?  The prompt is displayed after some delay when no
input is typed?  Or applications are read from disk and are slower
to start?




ELKS 0.0.81 slower than the 0.0.76

2000-07-12 Thread COIFFIER =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric

I've installed EKLS on an old 386 with 2Mbytes RAM. I've tried
several versions and I've remarked that the older versions are faster
than the newer. The starting is the same but the shell is slower.
The change is appeared between the 0.0.76 version and the next one.

Why ?