Re: [lm-sensors] RFC: conversion of ibm-acpi to hwmon sysfs

2007-02-27 Thread Jean Delvare
Hi Henrique, On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 15:06:35 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: On Mon, 26 Feb 2007, Jean Delvare wrote: Either way, I do not think that knowing the last measured speed is that useful. Given that it may be completely unrelated with the current It is, actually, because

problem about ACPI processor procfs

2007-02-27 Thread Zhang, Rui
Hello, list I met some problems when duplicating ACPI processor procfs interface in sysfs. #cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/limit Active limit: P0:T0 User limit: P0:T0 Thermal limit: P0,T0 IMO, Tx is easy to understand. It indicates the active T-state, T-state set by user

Re: [PATCH 3/3]cpuidle take2: Basic documentation for cpuidle

2007-02-27 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! Documentation for cpuidle infrastructure Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi [EMAIL PROTECTED] Signed-off-by: Adam Belay [EMAIL PROTECTED] Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li [EMAIL PROTECTED] Index: linux-2.6.21-rc-mm/Documentation/cpuidle/core.txt

Re: 2.6.21-rc1: T60 resume from suspend to RAM issues

2007-02-27 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Michael S. Tsirkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2. As a separate test, I enabled DynTicks in .config. Seems to work fine but won't come out of suspend to memory at all: pressing Fn/F4 seems to have no effect. Do you believe that the second problem was caused by dynticks?

Re: 2.6.21-rc1: T60 resume from suspend to RAM issues

2007-02-27 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! * Michael S. Tsirkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2. As a separate test, I enabled DynTicks in .config. Seems to work fine but won't come out of suspend to memory at all: pressing Fn/F4 seems to have no effect. Do you believe that the second problem was caused by dynticks?

Re: 2.6.21-rc1: T60 resume from suspend to RAM issues

2007-02-27 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Michael S. Tsirkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do you believe that the second problem was caused by dynticks? Assuming these are 2 different problems, yes, the second one seems to be caused by dyntics. on my T60 current -git does not resume even without dynticks. v2.6.20

Re: 2.6.21-rc1: T60 resume from suspend to RAM issues

2007-02-27 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
Quoting Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Subject: Re: 2.6.21-rc1: T60 resume from suspend to RAM issues * Michael S. Tsirkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2. As a separate test, I enabled DynTicks in .config. Seems to work fine but won't come out of suspend to memory at all: pressing

Re: 2.6.21-rc1: T60 resume from suspend to RAM issues

2007-02-27 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
Quoting Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Subject: Re: 2.6.21-rc1: T60 resume from suspend to RAM issues * Michael S. Tsirkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do you believe that the second problem was caused by dynticks? Assuming these are 2 different problems, yes, the second one

Re: Fw: ata-piix ACPI errors

2007-02-27 Thread Thomas Renninger
On Fri, 2007-02-23 at 02:08 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: I'm starting to think that big acpi merge came a bit too soon. Begin forwarded message: Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 15:29:42 +0200 (EET) From: Meelis Roos [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Linux Kernel list linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject:

Re: problem about ACPI processor procfs

2007-02-27 Thread Thomas Renninger
On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 17:33 +0800, Zhang, Rui wrote: Hello, list I met some problems when duplicating ACPI processor procfs interface in sysfs. #cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/limit Active limit: P0:T0 User limit: P0:T0 Thermal limit:P0,T0 IMO, Tx is easy to

RE: problem about ACPI processor procfs

2007-02-27 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
Yes. All the things needed are in cpufreq already and I don't think we need to export things like P-state power etc in /sys. I think we should be able to remove all P-state stuff in /proc/acpi without adding anything in cpufreq. Thanks, Venki -Original Message- From: Thomas Renninger

Re: [PATCH 1/3]cpuidle take2: Core cpuidle infrastructure

2007-02-27 Thread Dave Jones
On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 01:52:57PM -0800, Venkatesh Pallipadi wrote: Announcing 'cpuidle', a new CPU power management infrastructure to manage idle CPUs in a clean and efficient manner. cpuidle separates out the drivers that can provide support for multiple types of idle states and policy

Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (v2) (part 1)

2007-02-27 Thread S.Çağlar Onur
27 Şub 2007 Sal tarihinde, Fabio Comolli şunları yazmıştı: Confirmed, although the problem I see is probably different from Ismael's one: in my case /proc/acpi/adapter/AC is present but kpowersave does not work (it works in 2.6.20). The only file I seem to be missing is /proc/acpi/info, but

Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (v2) (part 1)

2007-02-27 Thread S.Çağlar Onur
27 Şub 2007 Sal tarihinde, S.Çağlar Onur şunları yazmıştı: 27 Şub 2007 Sal tarihinde, Fabio Comolli şunları yazmıştı: Confirmed, although the problem I see is probably different from Ismael's one: in my case /proc/acpi/adapter/AC is present but kpowersave does not work (it works in

2.6.21-rc1: more ACPI errors (EC__)

2007-02-27 Thread Meelis Roos
I tested 2.6.21-rc1 on my laptop (IBM X20 with 440BX) and found two problems: First, a seemingly harmless one - ACPI error messages during bootup: ACPI Exception (evregion-0420): AE_NOT_FOUND, Returned by Handler for [EmbeddedControl] [20070126] ACPI Exception (dswexec-0462): AE_NOT_FOUND,

Re: PROBLEM: BUG: when resuming from suspend-to-ram

2007-02-27 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tuesday, 27 February 2007 23:04, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: Hi, On Tuesday, 27 February 2007 19:45, Kristian Grønfeldt Sørensen wrote: Hi. PROBLEM: BUG: when resumimg from suspend-to-ram My laptop have a problem with resuming from suspend-to-ram. It does not occur every

Re: [lm-sensors] RFC: conversion of ibm-acpi to hwmon sysfs

2007-02-27 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Tue, 27 Feb 2007, Jean Delvare wrote: I don't really have time for such long reads, sorry. If there's anything in particular you think I should know, just tell me. Just that the stale value is indeed useful on one particular case. pwm#_enable = 0 means fan# at full speed, _not_ fan#

Re: bugzilla.kernel.org bug 7988: Resume from RAM on Toshiba A100 fails

2007-02-27 Thread Mitch Davis
On 2/22/07, Mitch Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I was inspired by Matthew Garrett's talk at LCA to find out why my Toshiba laptop doesn't resume after a suspend. I did what I could to diagnose it, and logged the problem here: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7988 In the

Re: bugzilla.kernel.org bug 7988: Resume from RAM on Toshiba A100 fails

2007-02-27 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Wednesday, 28 February 2007 01:04, Mitch Davis wrote: On 2/22/07, Mitch Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I was inspired by Matthew Garrett's talk at LCA to find out why my Toshiba laptop doesn't resume after a suspend. I did what I could to diagnose it, and logged the problem

Re: [PATCH 1/3]cpuidle take2: Core cpuidle infrastructure

2007-02-27 Thread Dave Jones
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 08:47:55PM -0800, Pallipadi, Venkatesh wrote: I played with this a little, and got puzzled. My quad core box used exactly the same amount of power whether the 'ladder' governer was loaded in use or not. In both situations it was exactly the same as a vanilla

Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (v2) (part 1)

2007-02-27 Thread Alan
On Tue, 27 Feb 2007 15:00:29 +0200 (EET) Meelis Roos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Subject: ata-piix ACPI errors (40/80 pin cable mix) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/22/159 Submitter : Meelis Roos [EMAIL PROTECTED] Status : unknown Still appears, but this does not seem to

Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (v2) (part 1)

2007-02-27 Thread Meelis Roos
Subject: ata-piix ACPI errors (40/80 pin cable mix) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/22/159 Submitter : Meelis Roos [EMAIL PROTECTED] Status : unknown Still appears, but this does not seem to be 40/80 pin cable problem to be but rather ata-piix calling some acpi methods and