This patch fixes an off-by-one spotted by the Coverity checker.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
--- linux-2.6/drivers/misc/sony-laptop.c.old2008-02-20 00:26:21.0
+0200
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/misc/sony-laptop.c2008-02-20 00:26:38.0
+0200
@@ -314,9
This patch fixes a check-after-use spotted by the Coverity checker.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
570462ca4441d8d63dfd46efe6e5b2b1c251a611 diff --git a/drivers/thermal/thermal.c
b/drivers/thermal/thermal.c
index e782b3e..958654b 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/thermal.c
+++ b
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 04:25:02PM -0800, Harvey Harrison wrote:
On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 02:14 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
This patch fixes a check-after-use spotted by the Coverity checker.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
570462ca4441d8d63dfd46efe6e5b2b1c251a611 diff
acpi_chain_head can become static.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
cc3a04eb55aeb07d17bb7701b2227079b752508f diff --git a/drivers/acpi/event.c
b/drivers/acpi/event.c
index 5479dc0..abec1ca 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/event.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/event.c
@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ static
acpi_find_dsdt_initrd() can become static.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
98cd5a55aff78aaacc3f8615164e2247f3bbed70 diff --git a/drivers/acpi/osl.c
b/drivers/acpi/osl.c
index 34b3386..0c37c65 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/osl.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/osl.c
@@ -325,7 +325,7
acpi_no_initrd_override_setup() can become static.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
1778953a9751288a9bee1d4f6a8b4f3d22e37f52 diff --git a/drivers/acpi/osl.c
b/drivers/acpi/osl.c
index 0c37c65..b72a7f1 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/osl.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/osl.c
@@ -419,7 +419,7
On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 04:12:25PM -0500, Elvis Pranskevichus wrote:
Jean Delvare wrote:
Hi Mike,
On Sat, 8 Dec 2007 21:22:34 -0500, Mike Houston wrote:
On Sun, 9 Dec 2007 01:05:54 +0100
Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 09:51:54PM -0500, Mike Houston
On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 06:43:39PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
Mark Lord wrote:
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 22:31:17 -0500
Mark Lord [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Speaking of which.. what's with powertop on 2.6.24 ???
It's gone from 100-200 wakeups/sec to 2 wakeups/sec
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 09:59:57AM -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 06:43:39PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
Mark Lord wrote:
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 22:31:17 -0500
Mark Lord [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Speaking of which.. what's
')
...
-- snip --
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
3225b3c19396e0e45f496dfe82e85ebc86951d91
diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c b/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c
index 2d88f7c..a7536dc 100644
--- a/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c
+++ b/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ static int __devinit
acpi_pci_link_exit() is both unused and empty.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
16d6853a1facb9bcb7a4bc19daad6d3b852cace3
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/sleep_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/sleep_64.c
index 79475d2..da42de2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/sleep_64.c
+++ b/arch
This patch simplifies the dependencies on __mem{init,exit}*
(ACPI_HOTPLUG_MEMORY requires MEMORY_HOTPLUG).
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
7f058c09288450736c541f6a5d043abd86d0c3bb
diff --git a/include/linux/init.h b/include/linux/init.h
index 5141381..7dc5085 100644
- acpi_os_read_pci_configuration
- acpi_os_create_semaphore
- acpi_os_delete_semaphore
- acpi_os_wait_semaphore
- acpi_os_signal_semaphore
- acpi_os_signal
- acpi_pci_irq_enable
- acpi_get_pxm
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
arch/ia64/kernel/acpi.c |4 -
arch/x86
After commit f1d4661abe05d0a2c014166042d15ed8b69ae8f2 this was dead
code.
Spotted by the Coverity checker.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
--- linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/battery.c.old2007-10-23 18:44:13.0
+0200
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/battery.c2007-10-23 18
This patch fixes a use-after-free introduced by
commit 30c08574da0ead1a47797ce028218ce5b2de61c7.
Spotted by the Coverity checker.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
--- linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/ec.c.old 2007-10-23 19:39:47.0 +0200
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/ec.c 2007-10
`cpu'
...
-- snip --
Based on a patch by Jeff Garzik.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
96d83d412fb6530173110c872f1125ae21938a99
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/processor.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/processor.c
index 2ed0a4c..f63e5ff 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/processor.c
), member))
-- snip --
Without the break, handler is being dereferenced after it was freed.
Regards,
Alex.
Adrian Bunk wrote:
This patch fixes a use-after-free introduced by
commit 30c08574da0ead1a47797ce028218ce5b2de61c7.
Spotted
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 02:06:48AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
...
Changes since 2.6.23-rc2-mm2:
...
git-acpi.patch
...
git trees
...
struct menu_governor needlessly again became global.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
cb33b296204127cf50df54b84b2d79e152fb924b
diff --git
This patch makes the needlessly global create_modalias() static.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
08005ed26370f24624bc7d88ced619318f4c0f56
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
index be74347..64620d6 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 01:51:06AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
...
Changes since 2.6.23-rc2-mm1:
...
+ide-ide-hook-acpi-psx-method-to-ide-power-on-off.patch
...
IDE tree updates
...
This patch removes the unused EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ide_acpi_set_state)
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 08:08:20AM +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
...
scripts/mod/file2alias is the program that reads this: although it can
be altered to parse 32-vs-64, Adrian's fix is the simplest.
s/Adrian/Thomas/
Hope that clarifies,
Rusty.
cu
Adrian
--
Is there not promise of
This patch makes the needlessly global acpi_event_seqnum static.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
--- linux-2.6.23-rc1-mm1/drivers/acpi/event.c.old 2007-07-26
02:32:59.0 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.23-rc1-mm1/drivers/acpi/event.c 2007-07-26 02:33:07.0
+0200
This patch fixes an obvious use-after-free introduced by
commit 837012ede14a8fc088be3682c964da7fc6af026b.
Spotted by the Coverity checker.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
--- linux-2.6.23-rc1-mm1/drivers/acpi/ec.c.old 2007-07-28 07:59:49.0
+0200
+++ linux-2.6.23-rc1
The Coverity checker spotted the following use-after-free in
acpi_battery_add():
-- snip --
...
static int acpi_battery_add(struct acpi_device *device)
{
...
if (result) {
acpi_battery_remove_fs(device);
kfree(battery);
}
On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 02:38:05PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
...
+config SUSPEND
+ bool Suspend
Suspend to RAM
...
config HIBERNATION
bool Hibernation
... Hibernation (Suspend to disk)
cu
Adrian
--
Is there not promise of rain? Ling Tan asked
On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 11:17:20PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Sunday, 29 July 2007 22:40, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 02:38:05PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
...
+config SUSPEND
+ bool Suspend
Suspend to RAM
Not only. This also includes
of depending on it.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
kernel/power/Kconfig | 20 ++--
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/power/Kconfig
+++ b/kernel/power/Kconfig
@@ -72,9 +72,22 @@ config PM_TRACE
CAUTION: this option will cause
On Sat, Jul 28, 2007 at 12:47:37AM +0200, Stefan Richter wrote:
Adrian Bunk wrote:
The dependency of SUSPEND_SMP on HOTPLUG_CPU is quite unintuitive,
It's not entirely unintuitive. That option's full name is Support for
suspend on SMP and hot-pluggable CPUs.
Only the place where you
This patch contains the scheduled removal of the ACPI procfs interface.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt |8 -
drivers/acpi/Kconfig | 13 -
drivers/acpi/debug.c | 143
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 09:13:54PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 03:06:11AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
@@ -65,1 +60,1 @@
- depends on X86_ACPI_CPUFREQ || X86_SPEEDSTEP_CENTRINO_ACPI ||
X86_POWERNOW_K8_ACPI
+ depends on X86_ACPI_CPUFREQ
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 07:22:55PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 10:20:37PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Hi Adrian,
Hi Dave,
This patch contains the overdue removal of X86_SPEEDSTEP_CENTRINO_ACPI.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Acked-by: Venkatesh
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 08:36:48PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 01:43:13AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Applying '[CPUFREQ] the overdue removal of X86_SPEEDSTEP_CENTRINO_ACPI'
error: patch failed: arch/x86_64/kernel/cpufreq/Kconfig:65
error: arch/x86_64/kernel
This patch contains the overdue removal of X86_SPEEDSTEP_CENTRINO_ACPI.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Acked-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Acked-by: Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This patch has been sent on:
- 6 Apr 2007
Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
--- linux-2.6.22-rc6-mm1/drivers/cpuidle/governor.c.old 2007-06-30
03:37:06.0 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.22-rc6-mm1/drivers/cpuidle/governor.c 2007-06-30
03:37:14.0 +0200
@@ -147,7 +147,7 @@
* @exclude_rating: the rating
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 12:50:11AM +0200, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
Fix compile warnings:
drivers/acpi/bus.c: In function 'acpi_bus_get_power':
drivers/acpi/bus.c:162: warning: implicit declaration of function
'acpi_power_get_inferred_state'
drivers/acpi/bus.c: In function
This patch removes dead code spotted by the Coverity checker.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/acpi/sbs.c |6 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
--- linux-2.6.22-rc4-mm2/drivers/acpi/sbs.c.old 2007-06-15 22:44:17.0
+0200
+++ linux-2.6.22
On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 10:03:13PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
...
Changes since 2.6.22-rc4-mm1:
git-acpi.patch
...
git trees
...
This patch makes the needlessly global osi_linux static.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
--- linux-2.6.22-rc4-mm2/drivers/acpi/osl.c.old
On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 10:03:13PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
...
Changes since 2.6.22-rc4-mm1:
git-acpi.patch
...
git trees
...
This patch makes 2 needlessly global functions static.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/acpi/processor_throttling.c |6 --
1
On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 10:03:13PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
...
Changes since 2.6.22-rc4-mm1:
git-acpi.patch
...
git trees
...
This patch makes the needlessly global struct menu_governor static.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
--- linux-2.6.22-rc4-mm2/drivers/cpuidle
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 10:57:16PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
...
Changes since 2.6.21-rc7-mm1:
...
git-acpi.patch
...
git trees
...
This patch makes the needlessly global fan_mutex static.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
BTW: Prototypes for static versions and static
On Sat, Apr 28, 2007 at 04:58:21PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Sat, 28 Apr 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:
...
BTW: Prototypes for static versions and static variables in a header
file are really wrong, but the mess is bigger than what I'm
willing to clean up
This email lists some known regressions in Linus' tree compared to 2.6.20.
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
of you caused a breakage or I'm considering you in any other way
possibly
This email lists some known regressions in Linus' tree compared to 2.6.20.
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
of you caused a breakage or I'm considering you in any other way
possibly
This email lists some known regressions in Linus' tree compared to 2.6.20.
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
of you caused a breakage or I'm considering you in any other way
possibly
This email lists some known regressions in Linus' tree compared to 2.6.20.
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
of you caused a breakage or I'm considering you in any other way
possibly
This patch contains the overdue removal of X86_SPEEDSTEP_CENTRINO_ACPI.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Acked-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt| 23 -
arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/Kconfig | 18
arch
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 06:23:10PM -0600, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 11:32:09PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Subject: kernels fail to boot with drives on ATIIXP controller
(ACPI/IRQ related)
References : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla
This email lists some known regressions in Linus' tree compared to 2.6.20.
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
of you caused a breakage or I'm considering you in any other way
possibly
This email lists some known regressions in Linus' tree compared to 2.6.20.
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
of you caused a breakage or I'm considering you in any other way
possibly
On Sat, Mar 31, 2007 at 10:52:59AM +0800, Jeff Chua wrote:
On 3/31/07, Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Subject: ThinkPad doesn't resume from suspend to RAM
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/27/80
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/28/348
Submitter : Jens Axboe [EMAIL
This email lists some known regressions in Linus' tree compared to 2.6.20.
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
of you caused a breakage or I'm considering you in any other way
possibly
This email lists some known regressions in Linus' tree compared to 2.6.20.
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
of you caused a breakage or I'm considering you in any other way
possibly
This email lists some known regressions in Linus' tree compared to 2.6.20.
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
of you caused a breakage or I'm considering you in any other way
possibly
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 09:03:06AM -0700, Ray Lee wrote:
Hey Thomas, Ingo, et al.
I'm having a problem, and tracked it down to what looks like a harmless
commit of yours. I didn't quite believe the bisect at first, so tested
it multiple times.
The original problem report, when I boot with
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 03:10:03PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Thu, 2007-03-22 at 14:42 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Starting with head as of yesterday and reverting two commits (that are
duplicates of each other -- the same commit came into Linus's tree via
two different paths) 'fixes
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 09:06:57AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On Sun, 18 Mar 2007 19:49:15 +0100 Adrian Bunk wrote:
This email lists some known regressions in Linus' tree compared to 2.6.20.
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer
Let's not bore people running -rc kernels with regressions that have
patches available - let's get this patches into the tree for giving
them the pure exciting experience of the many unfixed regressions.
This email lists some known regressions in Linus' tree compared to 2.6.20
with patches
This email lists some known regressions in Linus' tree compared to 2.6.20.
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
of you caused a breakage or I'm considering you in any other way
possibly
This email lists some known regressions in Linus' tree compared to 2.6.20.
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
of you caused a breakage or I'm considering you in any other way
possibly
This email lists known regressions in Linus' tree compared to 2.6.20
with patches available.
If possible, the patches should be included in 2.6.21-rc4 for reducing
the number of known regressiond in -rc4 a little bit.
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of
This email lists some known regressions in Linus' tree compared to 2.6.20.
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
of you caused a breakage or I'm considering you in any other way
possibly
This email lists some known regressions in Linus' tree compared to 2.6.20.
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
of you caused a breakage or I'm considering you in any other way
possibly
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 11:45:35AM +0800, Jeff Chua wrote:
On 3/1/07, Michael S. Tsirkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
with 2.6.20, pressing Fn/F4 generates an ACPI event and triggers suspend
to RAM.
On 2.6.21-rc2, after resume (when the box is accessible from network),
pressing Fn/F4 again
This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.21-rc2 compared to 2.6.20
that are not yet fixed in Linus' tree.
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
of you caused a breakage or I'm
This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.21-rc2 compared to 2.6.20
that are not yet fixed in Linus' tree.
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
of you caused a breakage or I'm
ladder_governor
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.h |2 --
drivers/cpuidle/driver.c |2 +-
drivers/cpuidle/governor.c |2 +-
drivers/cpuidle/governors/ladder.c |2 +-
4 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions
This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.21-rc2 compared to 2.6.20
that are not yet fixed in Linus' tree.
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
of you caused a breakage or I'm
This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.21-rc1 compared to 2.6.20
that are not yet fixed in Linus' tree.
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
of you caused a breakage or I'm
This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.21-rc1 compared to 2.6.20
that are not yet fixed in Linus' tree.
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
of you caused a breakage or I'm
On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 02:08:56AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
I'm starting to think that big acpi merge came a bit too soon.
Begin forwarded message:
Thanks, noted.
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 15:29:42 +0200 (EET)
From: Meelis Roos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Linux Kernel list
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 08:45:28PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
...
Changes since 2.6.20-rc6-mm2:
...
git-acpi.patch
...
git trees
...
acpi_os_readable() is no longer used.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/acpi/osl.c |2 --
include/acpi/acpiosxf.h |3
On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 10:28:34PM -0500, Len Brown wrote:
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 12:41:59AM +0100, Berthold Cogel wrote:
'shutdown -h now' doesn't work for my system (Acer Extensa 3002 WLMi)
with linux-2.6.20-rc kernels. The system reboots instead.
I've checked linux-2.6.19.1
This patch makes two needlessly global structs static.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- linux-2.6.20-rc6-mm1/drivers/acpi/hotkey.c.old 2007-01-28
23:31:03.0 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.20-rc6-mm1/drivers/acpi/hotkey.c 2007-01-28 23:31:23.0
+0100
@@ -234,8 +234,8
This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.20-rc6 compared to 2.6.19
with patches available.
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
of you caused a breakage or I'm considering you in any
This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.20-rc5 compared to 2.6.19
with patches available.
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
of you caused a breakage or I'm considering you in any
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 11:46:44PM +0100, Paweł Sikora wrote:
hi,
Hi Paweł,
for 2.6.20rc5 i get an acpi related oops during x86-64 boot:
http://minus.ds14.agh.edu.pl/~pluto/2.6.20rc5-acpi-oops.jpg
disabling the amd-k8 cool'n'quiet option in bios helps.
moreover, it works fine for
This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.20-rc4 compared to 2.6.19
with patches available.
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
of you caused a breakage or I'm considering you in any
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 03:28:45PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
A new one for you, it exists since 2.6.20-rc2.
Subject : ThinkPad removable bay support disabled unconditionally
References :
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-acpim=116750681901208w=2
Caused-By:
This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.20-rc4 compared to 2.6.19
that are not yet fixed in Linus' tree.
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
of you caused a breakage or I'm
This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.20-rc4 compared to 2.6.19.
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
of you caused a breakage or I'm considering you in any other way possibly
This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.20-rc3 compared to 2.6.19
that are not yet fixed in Linus' tree.
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
of you caused a breakage or I'm
This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.20-rc3 compared to 2.6.19
that are not yet fixed in Linus' tree.
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
of you caused a breakage or I'm
This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.20-rc3 compared to 2.6.19
that are not yet fixed in Linus' tree.
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
of you caused a breakage or I'm
, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This patch fixes a non-working NULL check introduced by commit
b229cf92eee616c7cb5ad8cdb35a19b119f00bc8.
Spotted by the Coverity checker.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton [EMAIL
This patch adds a prototype for driver_init() in include/linux/device.h.
It also removes a static function of the same name in
drivers/acpi/ibm_acpi.c to ibm_acpi_driver_init() to fix the namespace
collision.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Acked-by: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 12:58:07AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
...
Changes since 2.6.19-rc6-mm2:
...
git-acpi.patch
...
git trees.
...
This patch makes needlessly global code static.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/acpi/bus.c |2 +-
drivers/acpi
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 09:45:56PM +0100, Tomek Koprowski wrote:
On Thursday 07 of December 2006 20:54, Jean Delvare wrote:
Tomasz Koprowski (1):
PCI: SMBus unhide on HP Compaq nx6110
Bug #6944 might be related to this one, so I'd not include it in
2.6.16-stable.
Actually,
On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 02:09:56PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Sat, 18 Nov 2006, David Brownell wrote:
Running right now with a patch reverting the update which
made trouble on Linus' machine, but without Alexey's two
tweaks to the EC interrupt handler. So far so good, even
This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.19-rc6 compared to 2.6.18
that are not yet fixed in Linus' tree.
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
of you caused a breakage or I'm
On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 01:41:25AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
...
Changes since 2.6.19-rc5-mm2:
...
git-acpi.patch
...
git trees
...
This patch makes the needlessly global drive_bays static.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- linux-2.6.19-rc5-mm2/drivers/acpi/bay.c.old 2006
This patch makes the needlessly global ec_ecdt static.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- linux-2.6.19-rc5-mm2/drivers/acpi/ec.c.old 2006-11-16 23:07:31.0
+0100
+++ linux-2.6.19-rc5-mm2/drivers/acpi/ec.c 2006-11-16 23:08:45.0
+0100
@@ -84,25 +84,25
This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.19-rc6 compared to 2.6.18
that are not yet fixed in Linus' tree.
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
of you caused a breakage or I'm
On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 09:05:36PM +0100, Ernst Herzberg wrote:
On Tuesday 07 November 2006 06:41, Len Brown wrote:
On Monday 06 November 2006 21:17, Ernst Herzberg wrote:
On Sunday 05 November 2006 07:48, Adrian Bunk wrote:
...
Subject: ThinkPad R50p: boot fail with (lapic
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 01:44:29PM +0100, Olivier Nicolas wrote:
Hi,
Hi Olivier,
2.6.19-rc5 does not boot properly, I have tried pci=routeirq, irpoll
without success.
Full details (.config, dmesg, /proc/interrupts) are in
http://olivn.trollprod.org/2.6.19-rc5-irq.tar.gz
thanks for
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 12:20:49PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 04:43:13PM +0100, Christian wrote:
Did you have CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR=y in 2.6.18, or did
CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR=m, CONFIG_X86_POWERNOW_K8=y work for you in 2.6.18?
It worked with
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 03:04:48PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 06:32:12PM +0100, Christian wrote:
Am Freitag, 3. November 2006 16:56 schrieb Dave Jones:
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 11:25:37AM +0300, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
Could this be a problem?
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 04:43:13PM +0100, Christian wrote:
Am Montag, 6. November 2006 07:00 schrieb Adrian Bunk:
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 06:32:12PM +0100, Christian wrote:
Am Freitag, 3. November 2006 16:56 schrieb Dave Jones:
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 11:25:37AM +0300, Alexey
FYI:
Subject: Thinkpad R50p: boot fail with (lapic on_battery)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/10/31/333
Submitter : Ernst Herzberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Status : submitter was asked to bisect
It seems to be completely unrelated (except that it's also a ThinkPad),
but it might be
This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.19-rc3 compared to 2.6.18
that are not yet fixed in Linus' tree.
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
of you caused a breakage or I'm
This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.19-rc3 compared to 2.6.18
that are not yet fixed Linus' tree.
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
of you caused a breakage or I'm considering
1 - 100 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
