On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 00:34:17 -0800
Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 20:47:08 + Paul Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now, this was working in 2.6.23, but is not in any later kernel.
Previously reported, but I guess that the previous report was
ignored due to
On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 00:34:17 -0800
Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 20:47:08 + Paul Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now, this was working in 2.6.23, but is not in any later kernel.
Previously reported, but I guess that the previous report was
ignored due to
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 13:31:47 -0800
Gary Hade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FYI, the node contains 2 hotpluggable PCIe slots and 5
non-hotpluggable PCIe slots but 'pci_slot' only exposed
the 2 hotpluggable slots. This does not appear to be due
to a 'pci_slot' driver problem since I looked at the
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 11:29:54 -0700
Alex Chiang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have done quite a bit more testing, and verified that this
series plays nicely with acpiphp during all stages of the series.
Notably, you can modprobe/rmmod acpiphp repeatedly no matter
where you are in the series, and
On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 15:04:18 -0700
Alex Chiang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Documentation/accounting/getdelays.c | 43 +-
Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt |9 -
Documentation/hwmon/sysfs-interface | 31 +
Documentation/markers.txt|6 +-
On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 18:55:21 +0900
Kenji Kaneshige [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matthew Wilcox :
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 03:33:14PM -0800, Kristen Carlson Accardi wrote:
As far as being able to retrieve the slot number (which it seemed from
the HP manageablity application perspective
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 12:26:32 -0800
Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 01:21:54PM -0700, Alex Chiang wrote:
* Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 05:08:53PM -0700, Alex Chiang wrote:
Recently, Matthew Wilcox sent out the following mail about
Hi,
I notice in acpiphp that the code path for powering down the slot
via sysfs does not execute the _EJ0 method, but instead simply
looks for _PS3 and of couse disables all the bridges and devices.
I suppose this could be valid depending on your definition of what
On Mon, 1 Oct 2007 10:43:41 -0700
Gary Hade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 10:08:58AM -0700, Kristen Carlson Accardi wrote:
Hi,
I notice in acpiphp that the code path for powering down the slot
via sysfs does not execute the _EJ0 method, but instead simply
looks
On Mon, 1 Oct 2007 11:33:54 -0700
Gary Hade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In this case, I did send it directly to you with
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on [EMAIL PROTECTED] the
CC line. You and Greg subsequently signed off on it and it
entered mainline at 2.6.23-rc1.
Gary
Yay! Problem solved, that
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 00:14:36 +0100
Matthew Garrett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Modern laptops with hotswap bays still tend to utilise a PATA interface
on a SATA bridge, generally with the host controller in some legacy
emulation mode rather than AHCI. This means that the existing hotplug
code
On Fri, 7 Nov 2036 16:00:45 +0100
Holger Macht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri 08. Jun - 18:47:06, Samuel Thibault wrote:
[...]
Also, I'd really like to receive ACPI docking events in userland for
triggering video devices configuration for instance.
Via udev. Unfortunately
I just
On Fri, 8 Jun 2007 18:47:06 +0800
Samuel Thibault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
The dock driver seems to work for me for undocking: when I press the
button on my docking station, kernel prints a message and the button
turns blank, telling me that I can get my laptop out.
However, when I
event 1, or it may be event 0. Event 1 may also be a
remove request. It would be best if you check the number of your event
with udevmonitor before writing any udev scripts for inserting and
removing drive bays.
Signed-off-by: Kristen Carlson Accardi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Stephan Berberig
ACPI: dock: cleanup the uid patch
Make uid sysfs file error path free memory, and cleanup sysfs file
when removing driver. Also fix CodingStyle violations.
Signed-off-by: Kristen Carlson Accardi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Illya A. Volynets-Evenbakh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: 2.6-git/drivers/acpi
by zeroing the
pointer after freeing.
Signed-off-by: Chuck Ebbert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Kristen Carlson Accardi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/acpi/dock.c |6 ++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
Index: 2.6-git/drivers/acpi/dock.c
ACPI: dock: use dynamically allocated platform device
Get rid of no release function warnings by switching to dynamically
allocating the platform_device and using the platform device release
routine in the base driver.
Signed-off-by: Kristen Carlson Accardi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: 2.6-git
Carlson Accardi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: 2.6-git/drivers/acpi/dock.c
===
--- 2.6-git.orig/drivers/acpi/dock.c
+++ 2.6-git/drivers/acpi/dock.c
@@ -40,6 +40,13 @@ MODULE_AUTHOR(Kristen Carlson Accardi)
MODULE_DESCRIPTION
ACPI: dock: unsuppress uevents
Platform devices may not send uevents by default - override the setting
so that we can send uevents on dock/undock.
Signed-off-by: Kristen Carlson Accardi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: 2.6-git/drivers/acpi/dock.c
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 21:12:40 -0300
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007, Kristen Carlson Accardi wrote:
Is this what you had in mind? (Warning - I didn't test this).
Allow the driver to be loaded with an option that will allow userspace to
control
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 21:07:06 -0300
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the meanwhile, I would really appreciate a way to hook ibm-acpi into bay
so that I can provide the ACPI events ibm-acpi used to generate... we can
deprecate them and remove them in one year's time, or
On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 16:53:21 +0100
Holger Macht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon 19. Mar - 11:04:12, Kristen Carlson Accardi wrote:
On Sun, 18 Mar 2007 19:55:30 +0100
Holger Macht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun 18. Mar - 15:36:52, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Sun, 18 Mar
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 13:22:43 +
Matthew Garrett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 09:27:51AM +0100, Holger Macht wrote:
I don't prefer any solution, whether doing it inside the kernel, or doing
it in userspace. What would be good would be to know what's the 'right'
way
On Sun, 18 Mar 2007 19:55:30 +0100
Holger Macht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun 18. Mar - 15:36:52, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Sun, 18 Mar 2007, Holger Macht wrote:
those ThinkPads where it is needed. Afterwards it does the corresponding
dock/undock request on ibm_acpi. And
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 15:37:46 +0100
Holger Macht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sure. What actually bothers me is that in its current state, the dock
station driver signals 'green' on the dock station as soon as the user
presses the hardware undock button, but regardlessly of anything else. I
think
On Sun, 18 Mar 2007 15:36:52 -0300
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 18 Mar 2007, Holger Macht wrote:
those ThinkPads where it is needed. Afterwards it does the corresponding
dock/undock request on ibm_acpi. And this works reliably good what I can
see from the
On Sat, 17 Mar 2007 16:24:29 -0300
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
3. is_ejectable_bay is too simple-minded. It could work for batteries, if
it
didn't try so hard to detect only sata/ata devices as bays. Maybe
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 14:55:06 -0300
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Note that these are all just stop-gap measures. We either need to have
ACPI_BAY do everything needed in ThinkPads (like handling bay batteries), or
to make both drivers work together, or I'll just pull all
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 14:55:06 -0300
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please look at the patch I just sent. It allows ibm-acpi to load if
ACPI_BAY is loaded. It will, of course, cause ACPI_BAY to refuse to load if
ibm-acpi is already loaded, but that's probably fine as
Carlson Accardi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Len, you can pull this patch from:
git://repo.or.cz/linux-2.6/linux-acpi-2.6/ibm-acpi-2.6.git
branch for-upstream/acpi-release
Please send it to Linus for merge in 2.6.21.
It will clash with the patches in acpi-test that are waiting for 2.6.22
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 16:31:24 -0300
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007, Kristen Carlson Accardi wrote:
I think we should focus our efforts on a generic (non platform specific)
solution that can work across many laptops (i.e. ACPI_BAY). Let's make
On Tue, 6 Mar 2007 23:16:49 -0300
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 06 Mar 2007, Kristen Carlson Accardi wrote:
Eliminate bay events on resume if nothing has changed.
Are these *really* useless? What if the *contents* of the bay changed?
Humm... good point. I
Eliminate bay events on resume if nothing has changed.
Signed-off-by: Kristen Carlson Accardi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: 2.6-git/drivers/acpi/bay.c
===
--- 2.6-git.orig/drivers/acpi/bay.c
+++ 2.6-git/drivers/acpi/bay.c
@@ -51,6 +51,7
, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Kristen Carlson Accardi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Since the bay driver depends on the dock driver for proper notification,
make
this driver depend on the dock driver.
Signed-off-by: Kristen Carlson Accardi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Andrew
On Fri, 9 Feb 2007 23:09:29 +
Pavel Machek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Per your request, and the request of the distros, we've changed
how ACPICA Core releases are integrated into Linux so that each
upstream (CVS) check-in appears as a single git commit.
While this process is not
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006 11:43:55 +
Pavel Machek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Remove the procfs related code from the bay driver.
Signed-off-by: Kristen Carlson Accardi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This changes userland interface... how many apps will it break
Hi Len,
Here's a set of patches for changing the removable drive bay driver
(drivers/acpi/bay) from using the old proc interface to using a sysfs
interface instead. I made the bay driver a platform driver, and
so it's entries will now be located in /sys/devices/platform/bay.X.
There are still 2
Convert the bay driver to be a platform driver, so that we can have sysfs
entries.
Signed-off-by: Kristen Carlson Accardi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/acpi/bay.c | 87 +
1 file changed, 75 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
--- kristen-2.6
On Tue, 12 Dec 2006 14:31:10 -0800
Jesse Barnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday, December 12, 2006 2:15 pm, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
Hello.
On Mon, 2006-12-11 at 12:05, Kristen Carlson Accardi wrote:
On Sat, 9 Dec 2006 12:59:58 +0100
Holger Macht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well
On Sat, 9 Dec 2006 12:59:58 +0100
Holger Macht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I like to have them ;-)
Ok - how is this?
Send a uevent to indicate a device change whenever we dock or
undock, so that userspace may now check the dock status via
sysfs.
Signed-off-by: Kristen Carlson Accardi
From: Prarit Bhargava [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fix bug which will cause acpiphp to not be able to load when dock.ko
cannot load.
Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Kristen Carlson Accardi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/acpi/dock.c |8 +++-
1 file changed, 7
Hi Len,
Here are a set of patches for the dock station driver (drivers/acpi/dock).
One makes the dock station driver also a platform driver. The second
adds sysfs entries which will be created under /sys/devices/platform/dock.0
to allow the user to read the status of the dock station (1 for
Make the dock station driver a platform device driver so that
we can create sysfs entries under /sys/device/platform.
Signed-off-by: Kristen Carlson Accardi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/acpi/dock.c | 22 --
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- kristen-2.6
.
Signed-off-by: Brandon Philips [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Kristen Carlson Accardi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/acpi/dock.c | 95 +++-
1 file changed, 79 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
--- kristen-2.6.orig/drivers/acpi/dock.c
+++ kristen-2.6
On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 12:14:37 +
Matthew Garrett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 03:07:37PM +0100, Holger Macht wrote:
I'm currently looking at docking station support for various
laptops/vendors and what can be done to get them working. At the moment,
userspace has to
On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 20:57:40 +0100
Holger Macht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon 13. Nov - 19:50:25, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 08:43:27PM +0100, Holger Macht wrote:
What I'm doing at the moment (for about a week ;-) is to echo - - - to
On Tue, 7 Nov 2006 21:44:09 +0100
David Weinehall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 10:21:17AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
With 2.6.19-rc4, acpi complains about acpiphp_glue: cannot get bridge
info each time I close/reopen the lid... On thinkpad x60. Any ideas?
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7303
Use a mutex instead of a spinlock for locking the
hotplug list because we need to call into the acpi
subsystem which might sleep.
Signed-off-by: Kristen Carlson Accardi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/acpi/dock.c | 16
1 file
On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 00:02:42 -0400
David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I hope I've come to the right place; I'm going based on the
information in my kernel's MAINTAINERS file.
I have been using suspend2 with a 2.6.18 kernel, my Thinkpad T60p, and
a Thinkpad Advanced dock. When
When determining if a device is on a dock station, we should
check the parent of the device as well.
Signed-off-by: Kristen Carlson Accardi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: 2.6-git/drivers/acpi/dock.c
===
--- 2.6-git.orig/drivers/acpi
Hello,
Ever since I put out the docking station patches people have been asking me
if I could get removable drive bays to work as well. These are devices such
as the IBM/Lenovo Ultrabay, or the Dell Module Bay - basically removable disk
drives. There is an IBM platform specific solution that
-off-by: Anil S Keshavamurthy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Kristen Carlson Accardi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/pci/hotplug/Kconfig |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- 2.6-git.orig/drivers/pci/hotplug/Kconfig
+++ 2.6-git/drivers/pci/hotplug/Kconfig
@@ -76,7 +76,7
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 16:13:23 -0400
George Nychis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey guys,
I am running a 2.6.18-rc1-git7 kernel on my IBM Thinkpad x60s, with
CONFIG_ACPI_DOCK=y
Whenever the computer is inserted into the dock, ACPI seems to bomb:
http://rafb.net/paste/results/GW5E8747.html
I
On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 09:44:06 -0700
Brown, Len [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey guys,
I am running a 2.6.18-rc1-git7 kernel on my IBM Thinkpad x60s, with
CONFIG_ACPI_DOCK=y
Whenever the computer is inserted into the dock, ACPI seems to bomb:
dependent on the ACPI_DOCK option, but yet does not allow
the option of acpiphp being built-in when dock is built as a
module.
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Kristen Carlson Accardi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/pci/hotplug/Kconfig | 17 -
1 file
On Tue, 18 Jul 2006 19:57:12 +0200
Jaroslaw Gorny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I've got one Dell Latitude D505 with a dock-station, like this:
http://laptoptravel.com/product.aspx?pc=DELLDPORTV=DT
Hi! Can you please run an experiment in which you boot your laptop
undocked, and then dock and
56 matches
Mail list logo
