On Thu, 13 Jul 2006, Starikovskiy, Alexey Y wrote:
I'm terribly sorry that my patch broke on your machine.
May I ask you to send me or attach to #5534 output of acpidump from this
machine?
I'll send it in another email, since I already generated it for Len ;)
Do you think that the whole
On Wed, 12 Jul 2006, Linus Torvalds wrote:
(apparently about 300 of those processes, at which point the machine just
hangs, because even root cannot start any new processes, and I couldn't
actually get to debug this at all).
With ACPI debugging, I notice that it finally dies due to ACPI
On Wed, 12 Jul 2006, Linus Torvalds wrote:
I've got a hundred-odd commits to go, but the next bisection test happens
to be the parent of my merge (your merge linus into release branch
merge: ae6c859b7dcd708efadf1c76279c33db213e3506), so if I'm right, I'd
expect that to be a bad tree.
Likely related to bugzilla-5534
-Len
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-acpi in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Wed, 12 Jul 2006, Brown, Len wrote:
Likely related to bugzilla-5534
b8d35192c55fb055792ff0641408eaaec7c88988
Well, that one certainly looks likely.
Any reason to not just revert it? The fundamental problems that it
introduces are obviously much worse than the fix.
On Wed, 12 Jul 2006, Brown, Len wrote:
Likely related to bugzilla-5534
b8d35192c55fb055792ff0641408eaaec7c88988
Well, that one certainly looks likely.
Any reason to not just revert it? The fundamental problems that it
introduces are obviously much worse than the fix.
If reverting it
Here's a suggested revert.
Please try this smaller revert to just osl.c.
(it builds and boots for me)
It reverts acpi_os_queue_for_execution() to exactly
as it was in 2.6.17, except it changes the name to
acpi_os_execute() to match ACPICA 20060512.
(yes, it is okay we ignore the 1st parameter,
