Re: RFC: PNP: do not stop/start devices in suspend/resume path

2007-12-10 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
On Friday 07 December 2007 12:13:35 am Shaohua Li wrote: On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 02:24 +0800, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: Index: linux-mm/drivers/pnp/driver.c === --- linux-mm.orig/drivers/pnp/driver.c 2007-11-30 13:58:25.0

Re: RFC: PNP: do not stop/start devices in suspend/resume path

2007-12-06 Thread Shaohua Li
an actual problem, but there might be something related to hotplug while we're asleep or something. So I'll cc: some additional people who might have some insight. RFC: PNP: do not stop/start devices in suspend/resume path Do not disable PNP devices in the suspend path. We still call

RFC: PNP: do not stop/start devices in suspend/resume path

2007-12-05 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
we're asleep or something. So I'll cc: some additional people who might have some insight. RFC: PNP: do not stop/start devices in suspend/resume path Do not disable PNP devices in the suspend path. We still call the driver's suspend method, which should prevent further use of the device

Re: RFC: PNP: do not stop/start devices in suspend/resume path

2007-12-05 Thread Matthew Wilcox
On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 11:24:18AM -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: This means we will not disable the device and release its resources. The driver suspend method typically does not release its resources in the suspend path. For example, if we have: 03f8-03ff : 00:06 03f8-03ff : serial

Re: RFC: PNP: do not stop/start devices in suspend/resume path

2007-12-05 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
an actual problem, but there might be something related to hotplug while we're asleep or something. So I'll cc: some additional people who might have some insight. RFC: PNP: do not stop/start devices in suspend/resume path Do not disable PNP devices in the suspend path. We still call