Hi!
yes, acpidump would be more useful than just the DSDT --
as we get all kinds of issues with all the tables.
One problem is that shipping around BIOS images, particularly
modified ones, is sort of a touchy area. This is the code
of the manufacturer, who may or may not be happy
The home page for the Linux/ACPI project is moving here:
http://www.lesswatts.org/projects/acpi/
(Thank you to the lesswatts project for supplying webmaster
and hosting resources for us:-)
I conjured up most of the content -- so please send
any feedback on content to me.
Don't sweat the
Len Brown wrote:
and going away), and the DSDT databse -- which I believe
is also somewhat of a historical artifact.
DSDT database or better acpidump.out database might be very useful,
if could be searched for particular feature -- absence of EC, use of SBS, etc.
Alex.
-
To unsubscribe from
On Thursday 25 October 2007 15:24, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
Len Brown wrote:
and going away), and the DSDT databse -- which I believe
is also somewhat of a historical artifact.
DSDT database or better acpidump.out database might be very useful,
if could be searched for particular
On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 16:29 -0400, Len Brown wrote:
On Thursday 25 October 2007 15:24, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
Len Brown wrote:
and going away), and the DSDT databse -- which I believe
is also somewhat of a historical artifact.
DSDT database or better acpidump.out database might
On Thursday, 25 October 2007 22:29, Len Brown wrote:
On Thursday 25 October 2007 15:24, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
Len Brown wrote:
and going away), and the DSDT databse -- which I believe
is also somewhat of a historical artifact.
DSDT database or better acpidump.out database might
