Subject: ACPICA: allow Load(OEMx) tables
From: Len Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HP and Hitachi machines have been implemented with SSDT's
that use the OEMx signatures. But upon Load, ACPICA is rejecting
these tables because they are not using the SSDT signature.
ACPI Error (tbinstal-0134): Table has
Hi,
When calling hal-device-manager my Gnome terminal prints
'PropertyModified, device=/org/freedesktop/Hal/devices/acpi_BAT0'.
But 'cd /; ls' does not list a directory '/org'. What stands
'device=/org/...' for?
Is there a program description or tutorial of hal-device-manager?
Regards,
On some strange workload involving strace and fuse I get ocasional
long periods (10-100s) of total unresponsiveness, not even SysRq-*
working. Then the machine continues as normal. Nothing in dmesg,
absolutely no indication about what is happening.
Tried nmi_watchdog=1, but then the machine
* Miklos Szeredi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On some strange workload involving strace and fuse I get ocasional
long periods (10-100s) of total unresponsiveness, not even SysRq-*
working. Then the machine continues as normal. Nothing in dmesg,
absolutely no indication about what is
Hi all,
Here is a list of some known regressions in 2.6.22-rc2.
Feel free to add new regressions/remove fixed etc.
http://kernelnewbies.org/known_regressions
Unclassified
Subject: lag problems while browsing sites with heavy JS and or flash usage
References :
On 5/24/07, Michal Piotrowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is a list of some known regressions in 2.6.22-rc2.
Feel free to add new regressions/remove fixed etc.
http://kernelnewbies.org/known_regressions
ACPI
Subject: nx6125 has lost fan control
References :
Stripping some CCs, acpi and kernel list should be enough this one goes
to...
On Tue, 2007-05-22 at 01:31 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 12:42:00AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
On Mon 2007-05-21 14:45:53, Matthew Garrett wrote:
So don't do it badly. The advantage of
* Miklos Szeredi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
how reproducable are these lockups - could you possibly trace it? If
yes then please apply:
http://www.tglx.de/private/tglx/ht-debug/tracer.diff
With this patch boot stops at segfaulting fsck. I enabled all the new
config options, is
how reproducable are these lockups - could you possibly trace it? If
yes then please apply:
http://www.tglx.de/private/tglx/ht-debug/tracer.diff
With this patch boot stops at segfaulting fsck. I enabled all the new
config options, is that not a good idea? Which one
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 04:16:53PM +0200, Thomas Renninger wrote:
I doubt it is impossible, would you mind sharing your knowledge why you
think it is impossible or point to some related discussion, pls.
Because, as Len has pointed out, you end up with two different ideas
about what the trip
* Miklos Szeredi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hm, you should only need these:
CONFIG_EVENT_TRACE=y
CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACE=y
# CONFIG_WAKEUP_TIMING is not set
# CONFIG_CRITICAL_IRQSOFF_TIMING is not set
CONFIG_MCOUNT=y
does it boot with these?
Nope. Same segfault. If I
* Miklos Szeredi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CONFIG_EVENT_TRACE=y
CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACE=y
# CONFIG_WAKEUP_TIMING is not set
# CONFIG_CRITICAL_IRQSOFF_TIMING is not set
CONFIG_MCOUNT=y
does it boot with these?
Nope. Same segfault. If I try to continue manually with 'init 5',
could you just try v2.6.21 plus the -rt patch, which has the tracer
built-in? That's a combination that should work well. You can pick it up
from:
http://people.redhat.com/mingo/realtime-preempt/
same config options as above. If you dont turn on PREEMPT_RT you'll get
an
On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 15:36 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 04:16:53PM +0200, Thomas Renninger wrote:
I doubt it is impossible, would you mind sharing your knowledge why you
think it is impossible or point to some related discussion, pls.
Because, as Len has pointed
On Tue, 2007-05-22 at 19:49 +0100, Peter Clifton wrote:
Hi,
I just updated my bios to HP's latest, and have recently been upgraded
to Ubuntu Gutsy kernel version:
Linux version 2.6.22-1-generic ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 4.1.3
20070423 (prerelease) (Ubuntu 4.1.2-3ubuntu3)) #1 SMP
On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 20:51 +0200, Thomas Renninger wrote:
dmesg | grep ACPI | grep Error
[ 4763.428000] ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed
[\_SB_.C241] (Node df94c9dc), AE_AML_PACKAGE_LIMIT
[ 4763.428000] ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed
Last of the Section mismatch errors from ia64 builds! acpi_map_pxm_to_node()
is defined with attribute __cpuinit, but is called by normal kernel functions
acpi_getnode() and acpi_map_cpu2node().
Commit f363d16fbb9374c0bd7f2757d412c287169094c9 moved the data structures on
which this routine
* Miklos Szeredi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2.6.22-rc2, only EVENT_TRACE - boots, can't rerpoduce
2.6.21-vanila - can reproduce
2.6.21-rt7, trace options off - can reproduce
2.6.21-rt7, trace options on - can't reproduce
Possibly something timing related, that's altered by the trace code. I
On Thu, 24 May 2007, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
Tried nmi_watchdog=1, but then the machine locks up hard shortly after
boot.
NMIs in some thinkpads are bad trouble, they lock up the blasted IBM/Lenovo
SMBIOS if they happen to hit it while it is servicing a SMI, and thinkpads
do SMIs like crazy.
--
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Thu, 24 May 2007, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
Tried nmi_watchdog=1, but then the machine locks up hard shortly after
boot.
NMIs in some thinkpads are bad trouble, they lock up the blasted IBM/Lenovo
SMBIOS if they happen to hit it while it is servicing a SMI,
Tejun Heo wrote:
* Add acpi_handle to ata_host and ata_port. Rename
ata_device-obj_handle to -acpi_handle and move it above such that
it doesn't get cleared on reconfiguration.
* Replace ACPI node association which ata_acpi_associate() which is
called once during host initialization.
21 matches
Mail list logo
