Hello,
Just thought I'd inquire about people with IBM Desktops, and the
inclusion of these machines within all this ACPI hullabaloo. I currently
have FC5 running on an IBM ThinkCentre 8147-11U model. I am constantly
having issues with this system, and I believe they are probably ACPI
On Fri, 2006-08-04 at 13:09 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 03:46:31PM +0200, Thomas Renninger wrote:
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 15:02 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 07:17:37PM +0200, Thomas Renninger wrote:
+/*
+ * returns:
+ * 0 on
On Monday 07 August 2006 17:49, Adrian Bunk wrote:
acpi_force can become static.
Both patches added thanks
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-acpi in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 16:49 -0400, Brown, Len wrote:
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 10:25:43PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
ACPI_CUSTOM_DSDT seems to be the most interesting case.
It's anyway not usable for distribution kernels, and AFAIR the ACPI
people prefer to get the kernel working with all
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 07:33:31PM +0200, Thomas Renninger wrote:
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 16:49 -0400, Brown, Len wrote:
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 10:25:43PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
ACPI_CUSTOM_DSDT seems to be the most interesting case.
It's anyway not usable for distribution kernels, and
