On Monday 28 August 2006 08:12, Yasunori Goto wrote:
Am Fr 25.08.2006 13:59 schrieb Yasunori Goto [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Ok. Followings are current my understanding of sequence
with your patch.
At boot time, acpi_memory_device_init() is called.
acpi_memory_device_init()
|
+---
Am Fr 25.08.2006 13:59 schrieb Yasunori Goto [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I sent a patch a while ago that gets rid of the whole namespace
walking
by making acpi_memoryhotplug an acpi device and making use of the
.add
callback function and the acpi_bus_register_driver call.
I am not
On Mon, 2006-08-28 at 23:12 +0900, Yasunori Goto wrote:
Hmm.
Ok. Followings are current my understanding of sequence
with your patch.
At boot time, acpi_memory_device_init() is called.
acpi_memory_device_init()
|
+--- acpi_bus_register_driver()
|
+---
Am Fr 25.08.2006 13:59 schrieb Yasunori Goto [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I sent a patch a while ago that gets rid of the whole namespace
walking
by making acpi_memoryhotplug an acpi device and making use of the
.add
callback function and the acpi_bus_register_driver call.
I am not sure
[20060707] is the version (yes, it is a date) of the ACPICA core.
The ACPI_EXCEPTION() macro appends it to the exception message.
I just figured that out :) ... Seems okay to me.
P.
-Len
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-acpi in
the body of a message to
On Thursday 10 August 2006 16:26, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
Yasunori Goto wrote:
Hello.
I would like to repost this patch to remove noisy useless message at boot
time from 2.6.18-rc4.
(I said -mm doesn't shows this message in previous post, but it was wrong.
This messages are shown by
