Mattia Dongili wrote:
On Wed, January 25, 2006 6:23 am, Dmitry Torokhov said:
On Wednesday 25 January 2006 00:09, Brown, Len wrote:
[...]
I have no problem changing the implementation to avoid useless stuff if
the patch is going to be considered for acceptance.
The other argument against
On Wed, January 25, 2006 2:46 am, Dmitry Torokhov said:
On Tuesday 24 January 2006 20:17, Brown, Len wrote:
What's the problem with opening a socket to the user-space acpid --
the way multiple readers work today?
- one does not want to use current implementation of acpid?
- one does not
On Wed, January 25, 2006 6:23 am, Dmitry Torokhov said:
On Wednesday 25 January 2006 00:09, Brown, Len wrote:
[...]
If you remember original code (without registering multiple in-kernel
listeners) I think it was more compact that what is in the kernel
at the moment. Also IIRC current in kernel
Hello.
This patch series revamps an old submission[1] from Dmitry Torokhov that
adds support for multiple readers on /proc/acpi/event.
Due to the code reorganization happened in the last 1.5 years I
re-implemented it a little differently introducing a subscription
mechanism to receive events
What's the problem with opening a socket to the user-space acpid --
the way multiple readers work today?
thanks,
-Len
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-acpi in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
