RE: new pmtools available for testing

2006-12-12 Thread Moore, Robert
: Re: new pmtools available for testing Bob, Any chance you could tweak the C acpixtract so it can handle the parameter format of the old perl script? I like the newer way better, but it looks like backwards compatibility is within our grasp without mucking it up, so I think we should do

Re: new pmtools available for testing

2006-12-11 Thread Len Brown
Bob, Any chance you could tweak the C acpixtract so it can handle the parameter format of the old perl script? I like the newer way better, but it looks like backwards compatibility is within our grasp without mucking it up, so I think we should do it. On Sunday 10 December 2006 12:11, Alexey

Re: new pmtools available for testing

2006-11-29 Thread Bruno Ducrot
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 05:00:45PM +0300, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote: Writing new utility from scratch took half a day, while porting ACPICA acpidump with change in license would take weeks. It does include ACPICA types, so it will require ACPICA headers at least. Also it relies on ACPICA

RE: new pmtools available for testing

2006-11-28 Thread Thomas Renninger
On Mon, 2006-11-27 at 10:13 -0800, Moore, Robert wrote: I don't know what's going on here. I wrote acpixtract in C in order to get away from Perl and Perl issues. I certainly hope that we don't have yet another version of acpixtract. Second. Better remove this one soon. People are packing

Re: new pmtools available for testing

2006-11-28 Thread Alexey Starikovskiy
Thomas Renninger wrote: On Mon, 2006-11-27 at 10:13 -0800, Moore, Robert wrote: I don't know what's going on here. I wrote acpixtract in C in order to get away from Perl and Perl issues. I certainly hope that we don't have yet another version of acpixtract. Second. Better remove this

Re: new pmtools available for testing

2006-11-28 Thread Thomas Renninger
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 13:24 +0300, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote: Thomas Renninger wrote: On Mon, 2006-11-27 at 10:13 -0800, Moore, Robert wrote: I don't know what's going on here. I wrote acpixtract in C in order to get away from Perl and Perl issues. I certainly hope that we don't

Re: new pmtools available for testing

2006-11-28 Thread Alexey Starikovskiy
Thomas Renninger wrote: On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 13:24 +0300, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote: Thomas Renninger wrote: On Mon, 2006-11-27 at 10:13 -0800, Moore, Robert wrote: I don't know what's going on here. I wrote acpixtract in C in order to get away from Perl and Perl issues.

RE: new pmtools available for testing

2006-11-27 Thread Moore, Robert
pmtools available for testing Thomas Renninger wrote: On Wed, 2006-11-22 at 17:36 +0300, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote: Thomas Renninger wrote: On Tue, 2006-11-21 at 21:24 +0300, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote: Hi, acpixtract perl-script is being replaced by C xtract utility. Please test